> I tried your suggestion below, and for some reason its still assigning the
> same interrupt (whichever one I pick) to both the network card and the
> wavelan card, and interstingly enough even if I remove one of them, its
> still trying to get a routeable interrupt and the wavelan still doesnt
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> lists w
> rites:
> : I tried your suggestion below, and for some reason its still assigning the
> : same interrupt (whichever one I pick) to both the network card and the
> : wavelan card, and interstingly enough even if I remove one of them, its
> : still trying t
Hello,
I cvsup'ed 5.0-CURRENT yesterday, successfully compiled the kernel and
tried to compile the rest. However, when doing make in the lib directory,
it stops on libmp. The problem is that libmp uses include files from
openssl/, and they are not present in my system, as I can see they
don't com
:If I remember correctly from reading a thesis (can't remember its
:author) on the page coloring which I believe widely introduced this
:concept, page coloring adds a lot of efficiency to the directly
:mapped caches but even for the 2-way caches is nearly pointless.
:
:-SB
For the most part
Hello,
while trying to compile -current, I discovered some possible bug:
when compiling libpam, it stops on libpam/modules/pam_ssh/pam_ssh.c,
giving bunch of errors. The problem is that including security/pam_mod_misc.h
seems wrong, it doesn't find it there. When I changed it to simple
pam_mod_mi
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:33:40PM +, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I cvsup'ed 5.0-CURRENT yesterday, successfully compiled the kernel and
> tried to compile the rest. However, when doing make in the lib directory,
> it stops on libmp. The problem is that libmp uses include files from
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 03:18:28PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:33:40PM +, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I cvsup'ed 5.0-CURRENT yesterday, successfully compiled the kernel and
> > tried to compile the rest. However, when doing make in the lib directo
> Er... the OpenSSL sources *are* shipped with FreeBSD.
> Or at least they should be, if your CVSup is doing the right thing.
> Are you cvsup'ping the src-all collection, or the subcollections?
> There is no longer any need to *not* cvsup src-all, no matter if
> you are in an export-controlle
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 04:46:22PM +, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> > Er... the OpenSSL sources *are* shipped with FreeBSD.
> > Or at least they should be, if your CVSup is doing the right thing.
> > Are you cvsup'ping the src-all collection, or the subcollections?
> > There is no longer any
> > Hmm yes, it's there. But the snapshot I installed first doesn't
> > have it (why ?). When I installed it manually prior to compiling libs,
> > libmp compiles fine ... Btw, is there any guide of what is the proper
> > order of compiling things after cvsup ?
>
> Yep, the src/UPDATING file.
>
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 05:18:49PM +, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> > > Hmm yes, it's there. But the snapshot I installed first doesn't
> > > have it (why ?). When I installed it manually prior to compiling libs,
> > > libmp compiles fine ... Btw, is there any guide of what is the proper
> > > or
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä ÇÁ·£
Hello,
pam_wheel authentication module seems to be broken in -current. Look at
this (from src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_wheel):
PAM_EXTERN int
pam_sm_authenticate(pam_handle_t * pamh, int flags, int argc, const char **argv)
{
struct options options;
struct passwd *pwd;
struc
Hello,
I have a question. I'm trying to make a module for a PCI card. My
problem is my 'detach' function never get's called when I unload the
module. Al my other functions get called correctly. Here is my source:
#define DRIVERNAME "ide_mod"
#ifdef DEBUG
#define PRINTD(
please excuse and direct me to the right place if this isn't the appropriate
place to post this sort of question
we're looking into moving to freebsd (yea!), but found the following
problem. It seems that the shortest amount of time the below code will
sleep for is 20 seconds! any call to n
> Hello,
> I have a question. I'm trying to make a module for a PCI card. My
> problem is my 'detach' function never get's called when I unload the
> module. Al my other functions get called correctly. Here is my source:
Detach != unload.
The detach method is called by your parent to kick yo
if you can write a little sample code I'll put it in the sample driver.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have a question. I'm trying to make a module for a PCI card. My
> > problem is my 'detach' function never get's called when I unload the
> > module. Al my other fun
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> if you can write a little sample code I'll put it in the sample driver.
Isn't it already in /usr/share/examples/kld?
E.g /usr/share/examples/kld/cdev/module/cdevmod.c
--
B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cos
no, that doesn't do what mike said..
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > if you can write a little sample code I'll put it in the sample driver.
>
> Isn't it already in /usr/share/examples/kld?
> E.g /usr/share/examples
* Jeff Behl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010806 12:48] wrote:
> please excuse and direct me to the right place if this isn't the appropriate
> place to post this sort of question
>
> we're looking into moving to freebsd (yea!), but found the following
> problem. It seems that the shortest amount of
Which source file(s) are the kernel symbols defined in? By symbols I
mean the symbols that the nlist() man page refers to.
Besides the source files, is there any other place that the symbols
(their names and meaning) are documented?
Thank You,
Tabor Kelly
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Hi,
>From: Tabor Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Tabor Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Kernel Symbol Question
>Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 17:43:30 -0700
>
>Which source file(s) are the kernel symbols defined in? By symbols I
>mean the symbols that the nlist() man page
Hi,
I'm trying to find out what I have to add to make it works.
here's what I have:
FreeBSD 4.4-PRERELEASE #12: Mon Aug 6 19:13:32 PDT 2001
uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 9 at device 4.2 on pci0
usb0: on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
umass0: Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. USB Mass Storage, rev 1.1
Whats a good reference guide on how to install a -STABLE release?
Thanks.
---
***
*New & Improved: http://www.speedtoys.com *
***
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 4:05 am, Geoff Mohler wrote:
> Whats a good reference guide on how to install a -STABLE release?
The handbook
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html
and the freebsd-stable mailing list, which you should subscribe to and read
in
Alexander Litvin wrote:
> As for bind9 -- this has AFAIK totally rewritten resolver,
> which doesn't even resemble bind8. IMHO, to incorporate
> it into FreeBSD might take a tremendous effort.
Not really.
Just import it on a vendor branch as /usr/src/lib/libresolv,
and then things that want it c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Assem Salama writes:
: Hello,
: I have a question. I'm trying to make a module for a PCI card. My
: problem is my 'detach' function never get's called when I unload the
: module. Al my other functions get called correctly. Here is my source:
Don't use uprintf in
Matt Dillon wrote:
> Yes, that is precisely the reason. In -current this all changes, though,
> since interrupts are now threads. *But*, that said, interrupts cannot
> really afford to hold mutexes that might end up blocking them for
> long periods of time so I would still recomm
Tabor Kelly wrote:
>
> Which source file(s) are the kernel symbols defined in? By symbols I
> mean the symbols that the nlist() man page refers to.
Let's see...
The nlist() function retrieves name list entries from the symbol table of
an executable file (see a.out(5)).
In the case of
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:27:56PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I keep wondering about the sagicity of running interrupts in
> threads... it still seems like an incredibly bad idea to me.
>
> I guess my major problem with this is that by running in
> threads, it's made it nearly impossibly to a
* Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010807 02:16] wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:27:56PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > I keep wondering about the sagicity of running interrupts in
> > threads... it still seems like an incredibly bad idea to me.
> >
> > I guess my major problem with thi
31 matches
Mail list logo
