John Baldwin wrote:
On 18-Oct-01 Alexander Langer wrote:
Thus spake Alex Levine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
resetpriority() calls maybe_resched() at the end after updating p_usrpri
based on changed p_estcpu.
maybe_resched() uses curpriority_cmp to compare priorities of current
and given process and
Hello
I have a question about the behavior of mmap() in the kernel
built without VM_STACK option. The platform is FreeBSD3.3.
When the area allocated by mmap() overlaps the area between
vm_maxsaddr and USRSTACK, accessing the overlapped area
causes Segmentation Fault, although mmap() is returned
About a month ago I suggested that vfs.vmiodirenable=1 and the cd9660
file system interract badly. I have not got absolute proof, but I
think fairly good evidence of a causal link.
At work I have an Athlon 1.4GHz with 512MB ram, IDE disk, IDE burner
running FreeBSD 4.4 (no special options).
Tim,
Your license with SBS for the DDK would prevent you from posting your
code. If you read through it, you'll find that it prohibits the release
of any of their DDK code under any circumstances. You could release
everything EXCEPT the API for the card that SBS provides and offer the
rest in
On 19-Oct-01 Alex Levine wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On 18-Oct-01 Alexander Langer wrote:
Thus spake Alex Levine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
resetpriority() calls maybe_resched() at the end after updating p_usrpri
based on changed p_estcpu.
maybe_resched() uses curpriority_cmp to compare
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
Well, honestly, FreeBSD makes the life of the developers of third-party
binary-only drivers fairly difficult.
It does? On the whole, actually, I'd say we do a pretty good job of
making it easy.
The reason is that there
are a lot of API
-Original Message-
From: Peter Wullinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Re: Circular log patches for syslog
Just to spoil the thread:
Shouldn't things like this be available as additional package,
so that the base system supplies only bas(e)ic functionality
an everything
FYI:
http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1mid=221337start=2001-10-15end=2001-10-21
(about how things done in Linux).
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
(1) I am always wondering why not use a global rename lock so that there
is only one rename operation in progress at any time. This
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:About a month ago I suggested that vfs.vmiodirenable=1 and the cd9660
:file system interract badly. I have not got absolute proof,
I don't doubt that.
As I mentioned, there are several factors that I need to check into,
especially our agreements with SBS.
tim
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Doug Hass wrote:
Tim,
Your license with SBS for the DDK would prevent you from posting your
code. If you read through it, you'll find that
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:29:59PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
I've prepared a status report about this project. the xml file in
attachment have to be reviewed since I've just put descriptions
from FreeBSD-rc's Yahoo! Group and your email message.
WHY in the world are you sending in a
David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:29:59PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
I've prepared a status report about this project. the xml file in
attachment have to be reviewed since I've just put descriptions
from FreeBSD-rc's Yahoo! Group and your email message.
WHY in the
I didn't see anything like this in the archives, so I'm sending this to
the questions list and hackers list for assistance.
I am running FreeBSD 4.3 on a L440GX+ motherboard with dual PCI buses: 32/33
and 32/66 dual Pentium III @ 700MHz with 256KB L2 cache.
The system is running in Uniprocessor
Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Wullinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Re: Circular log patches for syslog
Just to spoil the thread:
Shouldn't things like this be available as additional package,
so that the base system
Cyrille Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just reporting this one exists as you report the existence of
Kevin Way's work two days ago. of course, it would be better to
have a -rc mailing list.
Not really. One more list to follow, when threads in existing lists
will probably be enough
Unfortunately, the recent patch to vinvalbuf() hasn't solved all of
our problems. We had another, different panic today. The process that
caused it was a 'tail' of a growing logfile over NFS.
I have actually had this problem before, with FreeBSD 3.4, and reported
it then. I believed this PR to
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:51:10PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:Unfortunately, the recent patch to vinvalbuf() hasn't solved all of
:our problems. We had another, different panic today. The process that
:caused it was a 'tail' of a growing logfile over NFS.
:
:I have actually had this
:I'm not able to reproduce this at will at the moment. The PR I mention
:has a program which it claims can cause the crash, which I will try
:running. I'll also try tailing various logfiles, including the one which
:caused this crash, which is being written to on the machine that is the
:NFS
On http://fly.cc.fer.hr/~zec/index.html you can find a 4.4-RELEASE fxp
driver source, with patches that incorporate receive interrupt bundling
microcode, borrowed from the Intel's Linux e100 driver.
Bundling interrupts for a couple of received Ethernet frames can
significantly lower interrupt
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your rcorder patch is incorrect.
Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and
connect rcorder(8) to the build?
YES I MIND!! What part of it is on the
On 18-Oct-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, fparseln() is defined in libutil.h (per the man page). I don't
have my current box available (power outage at home), but if you could
look over it, it should work.
Ah, that's right - I couldn't find
Hi,
Is there someone who can tell me how to set TCP windowsize?
Best Regards,
Gunnar
Gunnar Olsson Phone: +46 8 5062 5762
Xelerated Packet Devices AB Fax: +46 8 5455 3211
Regeringsgatan 67
On http://fly.cc.fer.hr/~zec/index.html you can find a 4.4-RELEASE fxp
driver source, with patches that incorporate receive interrupt bundling
microcode, borrowed from the Intel's Linux e100 driver.
Bundling interrupts for a couple of received Ethernet frames can
significantly lower interrupt
On 18 Oct 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Huh? Int on alpha is 32, and pointer is 64.
I thought we were ILP64 on 64-bit archs, but you're right. And I
ought to know better...
Fortunately (?) it doesn't matter in this case. Function arguments which
24 matches
Mail list logo
