M.D. , sise 572 chaussée

2001-11-15 Thread Vande Walle Daniel
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary==_NextPart_000_004D_01BE0CA9.BF0CA9F0

Re: FreeBSD on vmware

2001-11-15 Thread Glenn Gombert
Thanks for the tip Ian ...this works great! I have applied this patch to my desktop system ...and the FreeBSD Current kernel with this patch applied boots right up now...anyone else running Current under FreeBSD would fine it helpful to do as well Glenn G. Ian Dowse [EMAIL

-STABLE NVidia drivers

2001-11-15 Thread David Rufino
Hi, Just thought I would mention my -STABLE NVidia drivers have been working for the past week, as far as 2D and XVideo goes. Available on CVS at http://sourceforge.net/projects/nv-bsd. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the

RE: linux JVMs not handling SEGV well.

2001-11-15 Thread Koster, K.J.
[ CC'd to freebsd-java, please followup there too ] Dear Andrew, This question is better asked on -java, so I forwarded you question. There are many hardcore JVM hackers on that list. I'm using 4.x-stable, linux-base-6.x, and am encountering a lot of turbulence with both Sun's jdk1.3.x

Re: FreeBSD on vmware

2001-11-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 15-Nov-01 Glenn Gombert wrote: Thanks for the tip Ian ...this works great! I have applied this patch to my desktop system ...and the FreeBSD Current kernel with this patch applied boots right up now...anyone else running Current under FreeBSD would fine it helpful to do as well

[hackers] Re: wake up on lan driver support

2001-11-15 Thread David Gilbert
Hellmuth == Hellmuth Michaelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, definitely (thanks for the addition!). Many older power supplies cannot supply enough current on the +5VSB rail to support WOL. Hellmuth I have some experience with an fxp0: Intel Pro 10/100B/100+ Hellmuth Ethernet LAN card

Re: FreeBSD on vmware

2001-11-15 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 7:35 AM -0800 11/15/01, John Baldwin wrote: On 15-Nov-01 Glenn Gombert wrote: Thanks for the tip Ian ...this works great! I have applied this patch to my desktop system ...and the FreeBSD Current kernel with this patch applied boots right up now...anyone else running Current under

Re: kern.vm.kmem.size

2001-11-15 Thread Eugene Grosbein
So, how can I estimate needed value of kern.vm.kmem.size? How much ram do you have in the machine? On a 4.4-RC1 machine I have 320M here. with 128MB of ram we don't have any problems getting dirhash to use almost all of it's 2MB: vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152

_init execs in middle of code

2001-11-15 Thread PSI, Mike Smith
Does anyone know exactly what _init is? An nm of my executable lists: 080486a8 ? _init It is the lowest numeric address (before _start and main) so I would assume it is some sort of program initialization code. But when trying to determine the cause of a kernel freeze (caused by my user app), I

RE: _init execs in middle of code

2001-11-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 15-Nov-01 PSI, Mike Smith wrote: Does anyone know exactly what _init is? An nm of my executable lists: 080486a8 ? _init It is the lowest numeric address (before _start and main) so I would assume it is some sort of program initialization code. But when trying to determine the cause

Re: _init execs in middle of code

2001-11-15 Thread Terry Lambert
PSI, Mike Smith wrote: Does anyone know exactly what _init is? An nm of my executable lists: 080486a8 ? _init It is the lowest numeric address (before _start and main) so I would assume it is some sort of program initialization code. But when trying to determine the cause of a kernel

has 'options LOCKF_DEBUG' ever worked? (w/ patch) (fwd)

2001-11-15 Thread Maxim Konovalov
[ forward to -hackers because of silence in -current ] -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:35:17 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: has 'options LOCKF_DEBUG' ever worked? (w/ patch) Hello, Seems 'options

Re: has 'options LOCKF_DEBUG' ever worked? (w/ patch) (fwd)

2001-11-15 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Yes I saw this, I have no idea what 'JH' stands for either that's why I left it as is. The problem is that VTOI is ufs specific, this fix will break LOCKF_DEBUG for all other FS's other than UFS because it casts the vnode-data ptr to struct inode *. So your fix is broken. Please just fix

Re: kernel malloc questions...

2001-11-15 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Chris Ptacek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05 15:22] wrote: Hey all, I have a couple questions about kernel mallocs. I am trying to malloc a large amount of memory for a KLD during load and the malloc keeps failing. I am trying to malloc 64-128MB for a memory pool for a project I am working on.

RE: has 'options LOCKF_DEBUG' ever worked? (w/ patch) (fwd)

2001-11-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 15-Nov-01 Maxim Konovalov wrote: It panics because of if_inode is not initiliazed: /sys/kern/kern_lockf.c:1.25:153 /* lock-lf_inode = ip; */ /* XXX JH */ I have no idea what ``JH'' means, the comment appeared in 1.10. revision 1.10 date: 1997/02/10 02:09:36; author: dyson;

Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: eflags creash (fixed!)]

2001-11-15 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:56:31 -0500 (EST), Joe Clarke wrote: I learned about this by reading through some of the -hackers archives. One person complained of similar errors trying to get xine to work on FreeBSD. Removing the MMX detection code fixed it. I remembered libpng also used MMX, so

RE: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: efl

2001-11-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 15-Nov-01 Maxim Sobolev wrote: That explains... After a quick glance at png code I found that the only place where EFLAGS is altered is CPUID code, where the library flips bit 21 of EFLAGS in order to ensure that the CPUID instruction is supported (otherwise it will get SIGILL on older

Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: eflagscreash (fixed!)]

2001-11-15 Thread Joe Clarke
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:56:31 -0500 (EST), Joe Clarke wrote: I learned about this by reading through some of the -hackers archives. One person complained of similar errors trying to get xine to work on FreeBSD. Removing the MMX detection code

Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: eflags creash (fixed!)]

2001-11-15 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:56:31 -0500 (EST), Joe Clarke wrote: I learned about this by reading through some of the -hackers archives. One person complained of similar errors trying to get xine to work on FreeBSD. Removing the MMX detection code

Re: kernel malloc questions...

2001-11-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Chris Ptacek wrote: I am trying to malloc a large amount of memory for a KLD during load and the malloc keeps failing. I am trying to malloc 64-128MB for a memory pool for a project I am working on. My system has 196MB of memory and the KLD is loaded at startup so I am relativly sure that I

Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: efl

2001-11-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 15-Nov-01 Daniel Eischen wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:56:31 -0500 (EST), Joe Clarke wrote: I learned about this by reading through some of the -hackers archives. One person complained of similar errors trying to get xine to work on

Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: eflags creash (fixed!)]

2001-11-15 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:41:32 -0500 (EST), Daniel Eischen wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:56:31 -0500 (EST), Joe Clarke wrote: I learned about this by reading through some of the -hackers archives. One person complained of similar errors trying

Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: efl

2001-11-15 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, John Baldwin wrote: On 15-Nov-01 Daniel Eischen wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:56:31 -0500 (EST), Joe Clarke wrote: I learned about this by reading through some of the -hackers archives. One person complained of similar

Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: efl

2001-11-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 16-Nov-01 Daniel Eischen wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, John Baldwin wrote: On 15-Nov-01 Daniel Eischen wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:56:31 -0500 (EST), Joe Clarke wrote: I learned about this by reading through some of the -hackers archives.

Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: efl

2001-11-15 Thread Warner Losh
I'm also seeing this in my X server... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

ÖйúʯÓͺÍʯÓÍ»¯¹¤É豸¹¤ÒµÐ­»á

2001-11-15 Thread ÖÐó
»¶ Ó­ ²Î ¹Û 2001Öйú£¨ÉϺ££©¹ú¼ÊʯÓͼ°Ê¯»¯¼¼ÊõÉ豸չÀÀ»á ͬÆھٰ죺2001ÉϺ£¹ú¼Ê»¯¹¤¼¼ÊõÉ豸չÀÀ»á 2001ÉϺ£¹ú¼ÊÆøÌå¼¼ÊõÉ豸չÀÀ»á ÓÉÖйúʯÓͺÍʯÓÍ»¯¹¤É豸¹¤ÒµÐ­»á¡¢ÉϺ£Êлúе¹¤³Ìѧ»á¼°ÉϺ£ÖÐóչÀÀ

Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: efl

2001-11-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 16-Nov-01 Warner Losh wrote: I'm also seeing this in my X server... Maxim has fixed the kernel, so it should work fine now. Warner -- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ Power Users Use the Power to Serve! - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send

problems with 3Com 900TPO network card

2001-11-15 Thread Bri
Hi I have the 3com card that I listed above and I have a problem with the network card light going off on the hub and the card it self basically crashing for some reason which leaves the machine in an unstable state and then prepares to reboot itself. this happens after 4 days of usage normally

Re: sigreturn: eflags creash (fixed!)

2001-11-15 Thread Joe Clarke
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: Joe Clarke wrote: Sorry for the wide distribution, but I have sent email to both lists regarding this problem in the past. It seems that while doing intensive threaded operations in Gnome applications, crashes occur with the following