On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 02:48:12AM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
hi.. no offense... but Tyan motherboards are the one
which cause the whole problem...
What are you talking about? Tyan Thunder/Tigger boards work
*beautifully*.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 02:18:42PM +, Walter C. Pelissero wrote:
How about adding the nodump flag processing in tar?
This would be a *bad* idea. It would diverge our tar even more than it
already is -- which is so bad it isn't trival to update to the latest
version (ours is many years
Hello,
Any chances to MFC these changes before 4.5? The bug is very
annoying.
| mckusick2000/07/03 20:34:11 PDT
|
| Modified files:
|sys/dev/ccd ccd.c
|sys/dev/vn vn.c
|sys/kern kern_acct.c kern_ktrace.c kern_linker.c
|
I'd just like to know wether there are any i386 boxes which don't have a
timer_freq of 1193182Hz I know there might be slight variations but i
still have to come across a box that doesn't, which leads me to the
purpose of this email. Do we need to do the 8254 clock calibration?
One of the
I run FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE machine. I use ftpd for ftp server daemon. It has
very strange behavior with one of user accounts on my machine. Every one user
account on my machine can access it via ftp, exept this account, let call it
ttt. The ttt is not in /etc/ftpusers file and it can
Is the user's shell listed in /etc/shells? It must be there for ftpd to
let them in.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
I run FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE machine. I use ftpd for ftp server daemon. It has
very strange behavior with one of user accounts on my machine. Every one user
Hello,
We are trying to use BPF (Packet Filter) pseduo device to send and
receive the packets.
Even if there is a slight delay (Some processing has to be done on
the read packet) between the issuing of 'read' call, so many packets are
getting dropped.
Is there a way to attach
On 22-Nov-01 David Xu wrote:
According to GCC manual of inline assembler instruction, it says if your
instruction
changes condition code register(on X86, it's cpu flag register, and a simple
addl
instruction can affect it), you'd put cc there, I have reviewed some source
header
files
When did you last cvsup?
A few weeks ago.
My desktop machine at work is a tyan thunder k7 (S2462), I have no trouble
with it under FreeBSD. This is essentially the same as yours but you dont
have onboard ethernet, scsi or (I think) video.
Yeah, that's true.
I'm glad to hear that you are
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 11:48:24AM -, cameron grant wrote:
For the record, I'm running the 1.2Ghz Athlons on a Tyan S2460 board with
256MB of 266Mhz DDR-SDRAM.
check that your bus speed jumpers are correctly set as per the errata sheet,
not the manual. if you don't have an errata
Attached some patches that add a -p functionality to the boot process.
If booting with -p, every line printed during probing happens only
after one presses a key.
This was usefull to see the probe messages of a system that completely
hung (read: no scroll-back functionslity left) after probing.
On 26-Nov-01 Guido van Rooij wrote:
Attached some patches that add a -p functionality to the boot process.
If booting with -p, every line printed during probing happens only
after one presses a key.
This was usefull to see the probe messages of a system that completely
hung (read: no
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:36:01PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
I would call the variable name 'console_pausing' or some such, rather than
cninit_notyetfinished to better explain what the variable does.
Ok,
I also need to get rid of printf and directly write as to not interfere
with dmesg
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Rajesh P Jain wrote:
We are trying to use BPF (Packet Filter) pseduo device to send and
receive the packets.
Even if there is a slight delay (Some processing has to be done on
the read packet) between the issuing of 'read' call, so many packets are
I am going to be setting up four freeBSD servers as a test environment -
they need to be totally isolated machines. However, I would like to see if
I can do all of this on one server. The choice that comes to mind
immediately is vmware, but since I am required to use all freeBSD, I would
Greetings FreeBSD gurus -
I am brand new to the OS. I test NIC drivers for Intel products and we are
turning towards an emphasized support for FreeBSD. One of my test boxes
produces the following error on bootup: panic: swap_pager_swap_init:
swap_zone == NULL
A quick Google search suggests
If it's an ethernet type device
then you can attach to it via netgraph
and either write a small netgraph node to do what you want
or redirect the packets to a userland daemon that
does what you want.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Rajesh P Jain wrote:
Hello,
We are trying to use BPF (Packet
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Rajesh P Jain wrote:
We are trying to use BPF (Packet Filter) pseduo device to send
and receive the packets.
Even if there is a slight delay (Some processing has to be done
on the read packet) between the issuing of 'read' call, so many packets
are
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Frost, Stephen C wrote:
Greetings FreeBSD gurus -
I am brand new to the OS. I test NIC drivers for Intel products and we are
turning towards an emphasized support for FreeBSD. One of my test boxes
produces the following error on bootup: panic:
Joesh Juphland writes:
I am going to be setting up four freeBSD servers as a test environment -
they need to be totally isolated machines. However, I would like to see if
I can do all of this on one server. The choice that comes to mind
immediately is vmware, but since I am required to
G'day.
I'm sorry to say that 4.4 has a regression related to systems with 4GB
of memory, mostly related to poor test coverage.
You can work around this by reducing the amount of physical memory that
the kernel will use by setting a loader tunable. At the 10-second countdown
before the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zwane
Mwaikambo writes:
: I'd just like to know wether there are any i386 boxes which don't have a
: timer_freq of 1193182Hz I know there might be slight variations but i
: still have to come across a box that doesn't, which leads me to the
: purpose of this email.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:11:42PM -0700, Joesh Juphland wrote:
I am going to be setting up four freeBSD servers as a test environment -
they need to be totally isolated machines. However, I would like to see if
I can do all of this on one server. The choice that comes to mind
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:19:25PM -0500, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
I thought it was normal process for a new FreeBSD mailing list to be
hosted on another site until it was deemed beneficial to have @FreeBSD.org
host it.
Nope.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Monday 26 November 2001 03:45 am, Antony T Curtis wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
snip
In the jailng code, I allow jails to be identified using a name (other
than the hostname) when they are created, and that can later be used as a
The system I am running freebsd 4.4 stable allthough I don't know how to
reproduce the problem of the w, who, uptime, finger commaands hanging and
taking the whole cpu and when you ssh back into the machine I think sshd
runs one of these commands or calls a function that they use that makes it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zwane
Mwaikambo writes:
: hmm cross referencing here (forgive me ;) NetBSD nor Linux do this
: calibration and NetBSD runs on just about anything ;)
The higher levels of NetBSD does this if you are running ntpd. Ditto
Linux.
I measure phase differences in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zwane
Mwaikambo writes:
: When you say system time do you mean hardware time? or the running
: kernel's time?
Output of date command, which is kept by the kernel.
: The hardware time doesn't work anyway since the box's RTC
: is stuck somewhere in 2057 but the
Hi
We are using from 1993 Fiskars UPS 0.8 A UPS unit (Type UPS 1008A-
10EU, PartNo: 10 02 891 Rev A1, SerNo: 119355 9345, Made in Finland)
and few days ago the Battery failure control light started blinking.
We replaced accus (5 pcs 12V 4Ah) and we charged them for 48 hours
but the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:40:58AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:19:25PM -0500, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
I thought it was normal process for a new FreeBSD mailing list to be
hosted on another site until it was deemed beneficial to have @FreeBSD.org
host it.
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
snip
In the jailng code, I allow jails to be identified using a name (other
than the hostname) when they are created, and that can later be used as a
handle for signalling. Two of the concepts that are useful in jailng
34 matches
Mail list logo
