Hi Valentin,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:22:21AM +0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> There was a fresh discussion in some maillists (security-audit, glibc-alpha) of
> strlcpy() and strlcat() in context of possible inclusion to glibc.
> Among others, the question was spoken that strlcat manpage conta
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_6F12_7491.2AC3"
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_280D_6E9D.0BCF"
I got sick of (presumably) warez people probing my anonymous ftp site and
dropping all kinds of hard-to-delete trash in incoming, so I patched my
ftpd to only allow directories to start with alphanumerics. There's
probably a better solution, but this works for me so I figure'd I'd share.
Combinin
What? You don't like directories named '...w^Ha^Hr^He^Hz^H^H^H' ?
I like it, but there are a few problems. What about underscore? And
will this mess up people using ftp outside the U.S.?
-Matt
Matthew
if you make your incoming Write-only then they will hav elottle point in
puting stuff there..
We do this, in several places, and have a script move the incoming stuff
elsewhere at regular intervals too.
(not that I disagree with your patch but I often mode 'dot files'
e.g. .cshrc, or even CVS "#
Use isprint() on the entire string; this will give the desired result in
most cases. It should probably be optional (defaulting to on, since it's
a security measure).
> What? You don't like directories named '...w^Ha^Hr^He^Hz^H^H^H' ?
>
> I like it, but there are a few problems. W
The reason I only test the first character is that lots of filenames I
actually want uploaded may have some funkiness somewhere in their midst.
With an alnum first character I can deal with trash using tab completion
and not block the files I deal with normally.
isprint() is too liberal to save m
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 12:46:03PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> if you make your incoming Write-only then they will hav elottle point in
> puting stuff there..
It is already write-only, but I still get lots of directory trees created
and populated with files they cannot read.
> We do this, i
>> :+if (!isalnum(*name)) {
>> :+reply(521, "Bite me.");
>> :+return;
>> :+}
>
> Use isprint() on the entire string; this will give the desired result in
> most cases. It should probably be optional (defaulting to on, since it's
> a security measure).
>
>
Actually, wha
Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Thanks,
Alp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"
I am in the FIXIT environment trying to solve a problem. Unfortunately, I
have to use some files on (floppy X).
Is there any way for me to use (floppy X) withint the FIXIT environment ?
I tried to unmount the fixit floppy, but I cannot because the device is
busy, but I have no way to mount
On 16-Jan-02 Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:50:45PM -0800, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
>
>> Has this been fixed in -CURRENT ? And if so, can someone point me
>> at what files I can try to get onto -STABLE to get a higher speed
>> out ? I am working on an application and 64,000/se
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Joan Schunck wrote:
>
> I am in the FIXIT environment trying to solve a problem. Unfortunately, I
> have to use some files on (floppy X).
What exactly is the problem?
Paul H.
http://dp.penix.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Alp Atici wrote:
> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
> series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0 (or
> up)?
>
> Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Can't answer the gcc question, but yes, John
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, K S Sreeram wrote:
> My name is K.S.Sreeram, and i am very much interested in contributing to
> the
> freebsd kernel. I have been browsing through the kernel code, but i was
> not able to follow it much, and i dont
> know where to begin,
Pick something and run with it. Check
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Floris 'Tamama' van Gog wrote:
> I read that kevent/kqueue weren't very thread-safe.
Where did you read this? kqueue/kevent are perfectly threadsafe. Now,
whether kevent is useful in threads is a totally different matter
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Pow
Hi all,
I have a CPU-bound (well, 'malloc-bound' ;) program which takes
about 20 seconds to run on a 'fast' PC (Pentium3-1000, Athlon XP1600
etc) - the source is available as
http://www.idesign.fl.net.au/malloc_pain/malloc_pain.tar.gz (NOTE: you
*will* need GCC 3 (or more recent) to compi
Alp Atici wrote:
> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
> FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
> compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler
no longer core dumps on:
main()
{
int i;
19 matches
Mail list logo
