* Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020219 00:12] wrote:
http://web.netapp.com/engineering/projects/raidv2/testing/global/
uh, yeah it's not my header.
Oh duh, sorry...
If you do that then you have to modify all the files including it
correspondingly. Will putting an extern C { ... }
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 13:23, Erik Trulsson wrote:
snip
No, it is a feature of the makefiles. 'Make' itself doesn't know
anything about fetching sources and so on.
Most of the dirty work is done in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk which is
included by the port makefiles.
which means I can
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:34:50AM +0100, Pankaj wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 13:23, Erik Trulsson wrote:
snip
No, it is a feature of the makefiles. 'Make' itself doesn't know
anything about fetching sources and so on.
Most of the dirty work is done in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
* Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020219 01:06] wrote:
One potential problem is that 'make' on different platforms can differ
in many details.
Some of the features of BSD make that are used by the portmakefiles for
example are not supported by GNU make (which is used on Linux) GNU make
On Monday 18 February 2002 07:54 pm, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
hi all,
As to conclude this thread (for me.), I have come to the decision of
actually starting a project for making a BSD Licensed in-kernel HTTPd
server. The
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:54:01PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
hi all,
As to conclude this thread (for me.), I have come to the decision of
actually starting a project for making a BSD Licensed in-kernel HTTPd
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:31:13AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
Do these patches help?
Unfortunately, I was called out of town and will not be able to
get back to work with my test setup until next week. Will post
update then.
/\/\ \/\/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi hackers!
Help me to understand next
situation:
# cd /usr/src
# make buildworld
# make installworld
# make kernel
/etc/rc.conf:
sendmail_enable="YES"
After successfully install I see the next
problem:
Feb 19 00:00:01 xxx mail.local: lockmailbox
/var/mail/other failed; error code 75Feb
On 14:26+0500, Feb 19, 2002, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
Hi hackers!
Help me to understand next situation:
# cd /usr/src
# make buildworld
# make installworld
# make kernel
/etc/rc.conf:
sendmail_enable=YES
After successfully install I see the next problem:
Feb 19 00:00:01 xxx
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:26:44PM +0500, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
Hi hackers!
Help me to understand next situation:
# cd /usr/src
# make buildworld
# make installworld
# make kernel
Ugh. That's a dangerous way to go, installing world before you've
installed a new kernel.
[snip]
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:34:50AM +0100, Pankaj wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 13:23, Erik Trulsson wrote:
snip
No, it is a feature of the makefiles. 'Make' itself doesn't know
anything about fetching sources and so on.
Most of the dirty work is done in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
Waw!
Many thanks !
- Original Message -
From: Maxim Konovalov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dmitry A. Bondareff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Default mail.local permission
On 14:26+0500, Feb 19, 2002, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
Yesterday, I upraded an old HP Vectra (83 MHz Pentium) from FreeBSD
3.2 to 4.5. The machine had no CD-ROM so I tried to use NFS. For
a long time, the machine would simply wedge after I filled in the
IP config screen. Then I noticed that the NIC probed differently
under 4.5 vs. 3.2.
The last
Apache will switch to this method at some point. I really can't
understand why they went with that complicated pre-forking stuff.
Using non-blockijng I/O is just not that hard.
As mentioned previously, due to the blocking semantics of file I/O on unix,
single process servers will only provide
Sponsoring
This is for people who are ready for more of a challenge, a financially rewarding way
of building your business onward and upward. Sponsoring simply means introducing
other people into the Kleeneze business. You can use many methods to find interested
people; talking to
Hey,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:19:56AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
Apache will switch to this method at some point. I really can't
understand why they went with that complicated pre-forking stuff.
Using non-blockijng I/O is just not that hard.
As mentioned previously, due to the blocking
* Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020219 09:53] wrote:
Hey,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:19:56AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
Apache will switch to this method at some point. I really can't
understand why they went with that complicated pre-forking stuff.
Using non-blockijng I/O is just not
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:00:04AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020219 09:53] wrote:
Hey,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:19:56AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
Apache will switch to this method at some point. I really can't
understand why they went with
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for this.
- Has consideration in the loadable modules implementation been given
to a module dependency facility, in the manner of depmod in Linux ?
So that any module loaded will automagically load modules it depends
on to run ?
- I have
Title: Nouvelle page 2
Un ancien repris de
justice reoit
d'un des 10 hommes les plus riches du monde
l'ancien manuscrit secret des 7 pierres des Andes
qui ont plus de 6000 ans d'ge et
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Disk IO can't be done in a non-blocking manner. If the kernel doesn't
have the portion of the file you wish to read in the buffer cache
then the process will block waiting. There is simply nothing you
can do about this other than to offload that blocking into another
Hi,
At 21:01 -0800 18/2/02, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Bob Bishop writes:
| Seems there might be some problem with multicast on sis interfaces.
| Specifically, netatalk doesn't work right on this box through the sis
| interface but it's fine through the RealTek.
| This is the onboard interface on a
In the last episode (Feb 19), Cliff Sarginson said:
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for this.
- Has consideration in the loadable modules implementation been given
to a module dependency facility, in the manner of depmod in Linux ?
So that any module loaded will
Bob Bishop writes:
| Hi,
|
| At 21:01 -0800 18/2/02, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| Bob Bishop writes:
| | Seems there might be some problem with multicast on sis interfaces.
| | Specifically, netatalk doesn't work right on this box through the sis
| | interface but it's fine through the RealTek.
| |
I plan on committing the following delta to FreeBSD:
http://www.mu.org/~bright/usb.diff
The idea is to rename the structure fields within the USB ioctl
range to match what's commonly used, basically the prefix is
added as necessary.
The main reason this came about is the 'class' field in one
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can suggest using a netgraph module for the work as it can be connected
to a netgraph ksocket node to receive the requests (jdp made all the
changes needed to allow this to be done).
Another way would be to implement it as an accept filter which
Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/notes.html on the section
regarding non-blocking I/O:
The fourth generation. One process only. No non-portable threads/LWPs.
Sends multiple files concurrently using non-blocking I/O, calling
select()/poll()/kqueue() to
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On SVR4, an attempt to access a non-resident page via a
non-blocking fd will result in a fault for that page
being scheduled, while the call returns to the user
process with an EWOULDBLOCK.
A subsequent attempt to read it gets the paged in data,
and
SMS Message From: 0122622648, 20 Feb, 2002 13:07:36
subscribe
This service was brought to you by Maxis Net and Hotlink. To find out more
Hi Folks,
Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers
I was wondering how much work it would be to make the remote kernel debugging
run over the ethernet. I have worked on systems like this before (it's the
reason
I did polling network device drivers in Wind
gretings.
As seen on kerneltrap.org:
---
Andrew Morton: Ingo Molnar broke the ground here with his
2.2.12 patch which demonstrated that Linux could fairly
easily yield task activation delays which are one to two
orders of magnitude better than any competing operating
system.
---
is this a
define a task activation delay and maybe we can discuss it..
it's a rather broad definition.
and is that RTlinux? (which is a completly differnt kettle of fish..)
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Eugene Panchenko wrote:
gretings.
As seen on kerneltrap.org:
---
Andrew Morton: Ingo Molnar broke the
Hi George.
There was someone recently that posted that they had some sort of
remote debuging working over an ethernet (or at least that they ALMOST
had it working.). I remember thinking Cool. I have however had good
success with the serial crossover cables needed for the curren serial
debugger.
In message: Pine.GSO.4.10.10202190009260.16795-10@cranford
Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: http://web.netapp.com/engineering/projects/raidv2/testing/global/
:
:
: uh, yeah it's not my header.
: Oh duh, sorry...
: If you do that then you have to modify all the files
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: the #ifdef __cplusplus only kicks in when we're compiling c++ sources,
: sooo i think it's ok, gross but ok.
I'm not sure that I like it, but it certainly is precedented. X11R3
or R4 did something
Hi George.
There was someone recently that posted that they had some sort of
remote debuging working over an ethernet (or at least that they ALMOST
had it working.). I remember thinking Cool. I have however had good
success with the serial crossover cables needed for the curren serial
Work From Home Free Information
WHo DO YOU KNOW IN .INDIA -
CHAINA?USA-Europe-Africa-Asia:-Taiwan-HongkongKorea-Japan-Malasia-Pakistan-BangdeshMultibillion
Dollar International CompanyExpanding Rapidly, needs your help
EARN US$ 500-$1500 A MONTH PART
TIME$1,000-$5,000 A MONTH FULL -
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi George.
There was someone recently that posted that they had some sort of
remote debuging working over an ethernet (or at least that they ALMOST
had it working.). I remember thinking Cool. I have however had good
success with the serial
38 matches
Mail list logo
