This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--17932B47B695003DFEDACE26
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
L.S.
for a project in which I communicate with embedded controllers in cars I
need to read and write serial data at weird speeds of 5
We've tried installing Oracle 8.1.7.0.1 (for Linux) under
FreeBSD 4.5-release and end up with two jre processes
eating all the CPU and the infamous
kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled message scrolling on
the console. This has been reported before by others, and
I'm wondering if anyone has
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:20:57 +1100
Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
edwin On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 02:38:28PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
Finally I figured out the problem.
edwin Thanks for these two patches, it works like a charm now!
I just committed both
I'm crossposting to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as per suggestion.
My original post, edited:
... why any kernels compiled with SMP enabled seem
to be slowing the whole system down? Throughput goes down by 40%.
Tasks
take twice as long to run, etc, etc...
... it appears to be system-wide. And
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
I have been speaking with the author.
he is adding a BSD copyright.
also he says we can KNFify (style(9)ify?) as it doesn't have to
remain
compatible with anything else.
It might be nice if it could be folded into the driver it was copied
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
If its actually a Realtek clone with a few differences it wouldn't make
sense to add a whole new driver to the system.
Just a side note; the Realtek driver isn't entirely up to date. The
chip
thank you - I am glad to see that this is a good way of doing things. Two
quick items:
1. How do I give each jail a 'proc' filesystem in its /proc using this
configuration ?
2. Is there any downside to this whatsoever ? This seems infinitely
better than a new partition for each jail, so was
I've looked over the mailing lists and google and I can't figure out
if the patches to the 5.0 kernel to support ACLs in Samba ever made
it into 4.4 or 4.5 Release ?
--
Jim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
one other thing:
How many mount points (jails, in this case) can I run ? I see that there
are 8 existing vn0X device files in /dev - can I just create more of them
using MAKEDEV (or mknod) and keep going ?
What is the maximum ? 256 ?
also, do I need to alter the kernel to support more vn0X
Is this supported?
Cannot seem to find this version at
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.5-RELEASE/HARDWARE.HTM
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
At 09:46 28-2-2002 -0600, Theodore Hope wrote:
We've tried installing Oracle 8.1.7.0.1 (for Linux) under
FreeBSD 4.5-release and end up with two jre processes
eating all the CPU and the infamous
kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled message scrolling on
the console. This has been reported
Patrick Thomas wrote:
How many mount points (jails, in this case) can I run ? I see that there
are 8 existing vn0X device files in /dev - can I just create more of them
using MAKEDEV (or mknod) and keep going ?
What is the maximum ? 256 ?
Depends. Expect 256 to be available in all
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
operate on (struct user) will not be around
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
operate on (struct user) will not be around
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:26:49AM -0500, Clark C . Evans wrote:
| http://people.freebsd.org/~bsd/cdroot/
Ok. I've tried this route and it seems to be working,
thank you all so much for your help and pointers.
Whoops, sorry. I just replied to your earlier mail mentioning these
scripts,
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: Is this supported?
: Cannot seem to find this version at
: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.5-RELEASE/HARDWARE.HTM
If this is a USB ethernet chip, then I just got done reviewing a
driver from someone in
At 13:10 19/02/02 -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Bob Bishop writes:
| No dice with last night's -STABLE. And it's definitely the interface, I've
| tried a variety and netatalk works with everything (including the dreaded
| Via Rhine) except for the onboard sis0.
|
| I suppose it's time for
Don't the stuff I committed to current do what you guys want? I'm planning
to MFC it, but haven't asked Bruce yet. I'll need it before I MFC the puc
driver.
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had changes to do this
BDE refused to commit them.
On Thu, 28 Feb
Here is a context diff that fixes the driver. Not the most performant solution
(it requires allocating a new, zero'd, mbuf) but it's the most straightforward
fix. Auto Padding is still on in the driver. I saw no reason to disable this
even
though we're now go around it.
This fix is against
Respected Sir,
I have two NFS servers acting as backups for each other. We are
working in FreeBSD. Now when a server fails, the other server takes
over the IP address of the failed server on a different Network
Interface. But, now the clients of the failed server are not able to
mount from
20 matches
Mail list logo
