Terry Lambert wrote:
David Greenman wrote:
#16 0xc0152220 in tsleep ()
#17 0xc016abfe in m_clalloc_wait ()
#18 0xc01c8b14 in nfs_realign ()
#19 0xc01c9653 in nfsrv_rcv ()
#20 0xc01701d0 in sowakeup ()
#21 0xc01abd7c in udp_input ()
#22 0xc01a1bfb in ip_input ()
#23 0xc01a1c5b in
I have FreeBSD 4.4 installed.
My internal hardware modem is attached on COM4 and uses IRQ 3, but
FreeBSD was reporting this when boot:
sio1: configured IRQ is not in bitmap with probed IRQ-s
(or something like this). The problem was that in
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENETIC
was configured this:
this is an email i got from someone,
i can't find USBS or 0x5342 in
the fbsd 4.5 kernel source ... but
maybe it's coded another way?
i am wondering if this might give a hint
as to a fix for getting an olympus C-1Z/D-150
to work ... please CC off the list ...
I will start with a disclaimer, I
sorry - my grep -ir had a type - i will try this out
and post if it fixed things or not - sorry.
What the camera should send is : 0x53425355/* Spells out 'USBS' */
What the camera actually send's: 0x55425355
^
Error!
Will Froning writes:
I have a 4.5-RELEASE-p2 box that is my Firewall/NAT/NFS server. As a
NFS client I have a RH7.2 linux box. When I do massive NFS writes to
my FBSD (from RH7.2 box), I get a panic. I've attached the info I got
from my debug kernel.
While the fix being discussed
stirol02.doc
Description: Binary data
Hi All,
I would like to upgrade a bunch of FreeBSD4.3 computers to FreeBSD 4.5.
Following the FreeBSD handbook I have setup a computer as an ftp server to
serve the contents of the CD4_5_1 as the root for anonymous FTP.
I like to be able to write a script to tell sysinstall to simply upgrade all
* Koroush Saraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-04 09:56:39 -0800]:
Hi All,
I would like to upgrade a bunch of FreeBSD4.3 computers to FreeBSD 4.5.
Following the FreeBSD handbook I have setup a computer as an ftp server to
serve the contents of the CD4_5_1 as the root for anonymous FTP.
I like to
Terry,
No need to use me as an excuse to vent your feelings about
microbenchmarks vs. good benchmarks. I'm showing how to use a
user-space instrumented application to measure scheduling behavior, not
trying to make any claims about the relative merits of the operating
systems in realistic
*argh*
Moved to hackers...
[
Original mail from Drew:
I just booted a recent current (or rather attempted to) and saw this
when attempting to mount root from a qlogic card on my miata:
bus_dmamap_load: Too many segs! buf_len = 0x2000
spec_getpages:(da0a) I/O read failure: (error=22) bp
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, John Regehr wrote:
Have you tried benchmarking process to process context switch times to see
if the results are similar?
No, that's a good idea. My infrastructure isn't set up to support
processes, though, so it'll take a little time.
I'd be surprised if there
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 09:56:39AM -0800, Koroush Saraf wrote:
Howevever the problem is that it comes back and gives the following error:
? Warning: Can't find the `4.3-RELEASE' distribution on this ?
I think you need to use the new sysinstall from 4.5 rather
than the old one from 4.3. I'm
Stephen J Bevan wrote:
The correct approach for CPU affinity is to run with per
CPU scheduler queues. ...
If scheduler queue means the same as run queue then
per CPU run queues were added to Linux in 2.5.2. See
http://lwn.net/2002/0110/a/scheduler.php3.
I know this. The version we
Koroush Saraf wrote:
Can someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong and also tell me how to
script this?
You have a number of bad assumptions. Here is the correct
procedure:
1) Upgrade one system. This is necessary to obtain the
correct /stand/sysinstall program and the
Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
Can someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong and also tell me how to
script this?
put the cd in a directory named 4.3-RELEASE, sysinstall is looking
for such a directory on the ftp-server
Bad plan. Using the wrong sysinstall will get the hard
coded header
John Regehr wrote:
No need to use me as an excuse to vent your feelings about
microbenchmarks vs. good benchmarks. I'm showing how to use a
user-space instrumented application to measure scheduling behavior, not
trying to make any claims about the relative merits of the operating
systems in
Stephen J Bevan wrote:
This is the same way that the scheduling CPU and process group
affinity crap that Linux puts up with just falls out of the
code, as well, when you go to per CPU run queues
Since the thread on freebsd-arch didn't appear to have anything
specifically to do with
The problem is that it's not clear what the graphs you posted
are comparing. In the context of the paper, this will probably
be mitigated somewhat. However, there are a lot of people who
will turn directly to the graphs in any paper, and yell about
them, so I doubt you are safe, not matter
Have you tried benchmarking process to process context switch times to see
if the results are similar?
I put a quartet of histograms here:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/freebsd_ctx_quantum.eps
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/freebsd_ctx_yield.eps
that demonstrate, basically, what
Hi,
I compiled the source, changed a few parameters, and
SGE finally runs on FreeBSD. It is running in single-
user mode, with only 1 host. I am doing a little clean
up, and then I will need to make sure my changes do
not affect others (by #ifdef BSD).
It still does not get the correct system
If memory serves me right, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Will Froning writes:
I have a 4.5-RELEASE-p2 box that is my Firewall/NAT/NFS server. As a
NFS client I have a RH7.2 linux box. When I do massive NFS writes to
my FBSD (from RH7.2 box), I get a panic. I've attached the info I got
Hey there, I found this web site that gives some good sources for doing more with the
schoolÂ’s web site. Let me know what you think.
http://www.pluggedin.org/tool_kit/
Bradley Smith
Educator
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the
Can someone (for the love of god) make it an option for the
syscons screen savers to turn on when there's no keyboard
activity but there is actual output on the screen?
Basically, I'd like to be able to run top(1) but still have
my screen blank if i don't touch any keys after 5 minutes.
thanks,
23 matches
Mail list logo
