Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DO NOT EVEN CONSIDER STARTING THIS THREAD!!! It's been hashed
Double gah. Forget I said anything. ;)
However, just ranting about this problem[0] won't accomplish anything
other then wasting a lot of time and energy, IMO. There's plenty of
historic
--- Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Lambert wrote:
Unfortunately, the FreeBSD ethernet interface
isn't terribly
smart. Ideally, it would provide a virtual
interface per VIP,
all the way down to the card; it doesn't.
Probably wasn't very clear here.
The Tigon II, for
anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
BSD/Solaris machines?
i'm trying to share out two 200gb plus raid arrays to
a Mac LAN and will accept any information that can be
offered.
thanks!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need
I have a large server that will be running ~24 jails, 8 of which will be
running their own postgres server.
Because of this fact:
By default, Postgres allocates 34 semaphores, which is over half the
default system total of 60.
I need to tune kernel SHM settings in order to even run the second
* andrew mejia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020503 00:37] wrote:
anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
BSD/Solaris machines?
i'm trying to share out two 200gb plus raid arrays to
a Mac LAN and will accept any information that can be
offered.
1) This doesn't belong on -hackers.
2)
* Patrick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020503 00:38] wrote:
I have a large server that will be running ~24 jails, 8 of which will be
running their own postgres server.
You should be aware of the kern.ipc.shm_use_phys sysctl, you might
want to try flipping it on if you encounter problems as it
[ this is probably more appropriate for -net, -hackers bcc:'d ]
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:35:01AM +0100, andrew mejia wrote:
[andrew]$ exactly what i would suggest. a single
NIC can handle multiple assigments pretty easily,
unless you're expecting mega-traffic. but even then
you could
Hello hackers,
I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
specialized things. The idea is that the program must send
packets each T seconds. Ok, I know.. use the sleep, microsleep
things, and it works pretty well if the interval is greater than
1 msec. (recompiled the kernel
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:52:02PM +0200, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
Hello hackers,
I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
specialized things. The idea is that the program must send
packets each T seconds. Ok, I know.. use the sleep, microsleep
things, and it works
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
Well, the stab didn't go because nobody was interested 8-)
Sorry --- I was interested, but I didn't see your original message. This
problem has been biting me (and a client) in the ass for quite some time.
I actually had in mind some
Hi,
At 08:37 03/05/02 +0100, andrew mejia wrote:
anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
BSD/Solaris machines?
We run netatalk on both FreeBSD 4.x and Solaris 8. By and large it 'just
works'. Build with gcc 2.95 (not 3.x) to avoid problems on Solaris.
--
Bob Bishop
On Friday 03 May 2002 02:37 am, Dave Hayes wrote:
|
|
| All this dovetails with something I expressed earlier, with regards to
| annotating documentation. Somehow, this community needs to be able to
| process a certan class of ideas in a format other than linear mailing
| lists. Perhaps some sort
It appears that there is no support for the Adaptec 2903b SCSI card, but of
course I could be wrong. I would like to get this card to work, so if anyone
could point me to a painfully obvious url or some documentation on how to
get it to work that I have clearly overlooked, I would be forever
On 03-May-2002 Jason Borkowsky wrote:
Greetings! I have a FreeBSD-4.5 box that is a specialized server box. It
doesn't run any user processes and only runs a bunch of small, server
efficient processes.
I have an inconsistency that I am trying to explain. When I do a w
command
on
hi,
one possible solution could be to use gettimeofday (usec resolution )
and do a busy wait in a loop for T sec.
manish
http://www.cis.udel.edu/~jain
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
Hello hackers,
I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
specialized things.
Hello All:
I have pasted the error messages am getting on my
FreeBSD-4.5-RELEASE machine. I have attached the /etc/ttys file with the
mail, I hope that will be useful for the analysis since I have modified it
for /dev/ttyv8 -- KDM
FOLLOWING is the error message what am getting
Brian T.Schellenberger wrote:
The existance of this thread merely demonstrates that people don't make use
the resources that are already out there.
No, the existence of this thread demonstrates that the historical explanation
is less than satisfying as an excuse for the broken nomenclature
* Patrick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020503 07:19] wrote:
So kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 will give me more flexibility, but will slow
down performance (vs. using kernel memory) ?
It will not cause any problems unless you don't have enough memory.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Greetings! I have a FreeBSD-4.5 box that is a specialized server box. It
doesn't run any user processes and only runs a bunch of small, server
efficient processes.
I have an inconsistency that I am trying to explain. When I do a w
command
on the box, I see this:
Dominic Marks wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:52:02PM +0200, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
Now the problem is that I want to know if it is possible, and
how, to schedule events with a precision greater (or equal to))
than 1ms. Maybe an approach with posix timers? Maybe move the app
into
On Fri, 3 May 2002 09:15:01 -0400
Brian T.Schellenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTS Stable is, in fact, fairly stable. I mean, if you are going to track updates
I would go so far as to say that -stable is remarkably stable. So
much so that it is easily mistaken for some kind of
heavily snipped
All this dovetails with something I expressed earlier, with regards to
annotating documentation. Somehow, this community needs to be able to
process a certan class of ideas in a format other than linear mailing
lists. Perhaps some sort of meta-document is needed which
JJ Behrens wrote:
The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the same
thing with the FreeBSD handbook pages
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
any set of choices, before you get to what you want (HCI studies
Thus spake R. David Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
any set of
Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
[SNIP]
1 msec. (recompiled the kernel with HZ=10)
in my experience, compiling a kernel with HZ greater than 10.000 (ten
thousand) is uselesss (I even had crash with greater HZ)
TfH
[SNIP]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
That's right, agree 100%. I hadn't crash, but this fine granularity hard
to realize while other parts of system taking apart unpredictably.
More to fix than to use...
Igor,
ua3qrz
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Herbelot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:18 PM
To:
Hello; I have this quirky piece of serial equipment that I'm trying to
figure out how to work. I'm attempting to write a simple program that
sends a string of text given on the cmdline out to the serial port to
a 132x80 ANSI(?) serial display
The problem I think I'm having is with hardware flow
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:15:58AM -0700, JJ Behrens wrote:
The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the
Hi all,
I am submitting a patch which removes the register keyword from
sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c. The reason I am doing this is very simple.
The 'register' keyword has no effect, as compilers do enough optimizations
on their own. Also, I have seen commits made before which do the same
thing
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:45:32PM +0100, Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hi all,
I am submitting a patch which removes the register keyword from
sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c. The reason I am doing this is very simple.
The 'register' keyword has no effect, as compilers do enough optimizations
on their
Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
[SNIP]
1 msec. (recompiled the kernel with HZ=10)
in my experience, compiling a kernel with HZ greater than 10.000 (ten
thousand) is uselesss (I even had crash with greater HZ)
TfH
Yes, I had the same problem (4,4 stable and the same
updated to
Celebrate your Mother's love by sending a beautiful bouquet of fresh flowers
from
Flower.com
that will let her know how much she means to you.
PRICES STARTING AT
$29.95
Includes FREE Glass Vase($9.95
Value)
Quantities are limited so place your order today
forMother's Day.
Terry Lambert writes:
JJ Behrens wrote:
The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end o
f
every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve
to
enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the
same
thing
Bakul Shah wrote:
Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
any set of choices, before you get to what you want (HCI studies
at Bell Labs
In a message written on Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:15:58AM -0700, JJ Behrens wrote:
The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries.
R. David Murray wrote:
Sorry for dropping in to the middle of a conversation, but this
comment puzzles me. I fail to see how:
handbook + per-page comments from readers
is *inferior* to:
handbook with no comments
given that the handbook maintainers do not have infinate time
to
Terry Lambert writes:
Bakul Shah wrote:
Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
any set of choices, before you get to what you want (HCI
itself (since it likes to). FreeBSD does not have code to handle
assigning PNP resources, or at least code that works well :) (There is the
PNPBIOS kernel option, but I'm not sure that works anymore.)
The PNPBIOS option just implements another accessor method; resource
allocation is a
39 matches
Mail list logo
