>
> This was -stable- but it's really a hacker's question.
>
> I really am *not* much of an i386 weenie and I'll have to admit that I don't
> fully understand the interrupt mask scheme and I ran into a troubling problem
> .
>
> I was running some very extensive tests on a dual processor (but no
> itself (since it likes to). FreeBSD does not have code to handle
> assigning PNP resources, or at least code that works well :) (There is the
> PNPBIOS kernel option, but I'm not sure that works anymore.)
The PNPBIOS option just implements another accessor method; resource
allocation is a sep
Terry Lambert writes:
> Bakul Shah wrote:
> > > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > > any set of choices, before you get to what y
"R. David Murray" wrote:
> Sorry for dropping in to the middle of a conversation, but this
> comment puzzles me. I fail to see how:
>
> handbook + per-page comments from readers
>
> is *inferior* to:
>
>handbook with no comments
>
> given that the handbook maintainers do not have infina
In a message written on Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:15:58AM -0700, JJ Behrens wrote:
> The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
> every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
> enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries.
Bakul Shah wrote:
> > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > any set of choices, before you get to what you want (HCI studies
> > at Bell
Terry Lambert writes:
> JJ Behrens wrote:
> > The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end o
> f
> > every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve
> to
> > enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the
> same
Celebrate your Mother's love by sending a beautiful bouquet of fresh flowers
from
Flower.com
that will let her know how much she means to you.
PRICES STARTING AT
$29.95
Includes FREE Glass Vase($9.95
Value)
Quantities are limited so place your order today
forMother's Day.
ORD
> Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> >
> [SNIP]
> > 1 msec. (recompiled the kernel with HZ=10)
> >
>
> in my experience, compiling a kernel with HZ greater than 10.000 (ten
> thousand) is uselesss (I even had crash with greater HZ)
>
> TfH
>
Yes, I had the same problem (4,4 stable and the same
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:45:32PM +0100, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am submitting a patch which removes the register keyword from
> sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c. The reason I am doing this is very simple.
>
> The 'register' keyword has no effect, as compilers do enough optimizations
> on
Hi all,
I am submitting a patch which removes the register keyword from
sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c. The reason I am doing this is very simple.
The 'register' keyword has no effect, as compilers do enough optimizations
on their own. Also, I have seen commits made before which do the same
thing w
Hello; I have this quirky piece of serial equipment that I'm trying to
figure out how to work. I'm attempting to write a simple program that
sends a string of text given on the cmdline out to the serial port to
a 132x80 ANSI(?) serial display
The problem I think I'm having is with hardware flow
That's right, agree 100%. I hadn't crash, but this fine granularity hard
to realize while other parts of system taking apart unpredictably.
More to fix than to use...
Igor,
ua3qrz
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Herbelot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:18 PM
To:
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:15:58AM -0700, JJ Behrens wrote:
>
> The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
> every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
> enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the
Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
>
[SNIP]
> 1 msec. (recompiled the kernel with HZ=10)
>
in my experience, compiling a kernel with HZ greater than 10.000 (ten
thousand) is uselesss (I even had crash with greater HZ)
TfH
[SNIP]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
Thus spake R. David Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 3 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > any
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> any set of choices, before you get to what you want (HCI stud
JJ Behrens wrote:
> The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
> every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
> enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the same
> thing with the FreeBSD handbook pages
> All this dovetails with something I expressed earlier, with regards to
> annotating documentation. Somehow, this community needs to be able to
> process a certan class of ideas in a format other than linear mailing
> lists. Perhaps some sort of meta-document is needed which describes
> how thin
Dominic Marks wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:52:02PM +0200, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> > Now the problem is that I want to know if it is possible, and
> > how, to schedule events with a precision greater (or equal to))
> > than 1ms. Maybe an approach with posix timers? Maybe move the app
> >
> >> > Greetings! I have a FreeBSD-4.5 box that is a specialized server box. It
> >> > doesn't run any user processes and only runs a bunch of small, server
> >> > efficient processes.
> >> >
> >> > I have an inconsistency that I am trying to explain. When I do a "w"
> >> > command
> >> > on the
On Fri, 3 May 2002 09:15:01 -0400
Brian T.Schellenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTS> Stable is, in fact, fairly stable. I mean, if you are going to track updates
I would go so far as to say that -stable is remarkably stable. So
much so that it is easily mistaken for some kind of ma
* Patrick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 07:19] wrote:
>
> So kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 will give me more flexibility, but will slow
> down performance (vs. using kernel memory) ?
It will not cause any problems unless you don't have enough memory.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'In
Brian T.Schellenberger wrote:
> The existance of this thread merely demonstrates that people don't make use
> the resources that are already out there.
No, the existence of this thread demonstrates that the historical explanation
is less than satisfying as an excuse for the broken nomenclature
Hello All:
I have pasted the error messages am getting on my
FreeBSD-4.5-RELEASE machine. I have attached the /etc/ttys file with the
mail, I hope that will be useful for the analysis since I have modified it
for /dev/ttyv8 -- KDM
FOLLOWING is the error message what am getting continuous
hi,
one possible solution could be to use gettimeofday (usec resolution )
and do a busy wait in a loop for T sec.
manish
http://www.cis.udel.edu/~jain
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
> specialized thin
On 03-May-2002 Jason Borkowsky wrote:
>
>> > Greetings! I have a FreeBSD-4.5 box that is a specialized server box. It
>> > doesn't run any user processes and only runs a bunch of small, server
>> > efficient processes.
>> >
>> > I have an inconsistency that I am trying to explain. When I do a "w
So kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 will give me more flexibility, but will slow
down performance (vs. using kernel memory) ?
thanks,
PT
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Patrick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 00:38] wrote:
> >
> > I have a large server that will be running ~24 jails
>It appears that there is no support for the Adaptec 2903b SCSI card, but of
>course I could be wrong. I would like to get this card to work, so if anyone
>could point me to a painfully obvious url or some documentation on how to
>get it to work that I have clearly overlooked, I would be forever
On Friday 03 May 2002 02:37 am, Dave Hayes wrote:
|
|
| All this dovetails with something I expressed earlier, with regards to
| annotating documentation. Somehow, this community needs to be able to
| process a certan class of ideas in a format other than linear mailing
| lists. Perhaps some sort
Hi,
At 08:37 03/05/02 +0100, andrew mejia wrote:
>anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
>BSD/Solaris machines?
We run netatalk on both FreeBSD 4.x and Solaris 8. By and large it 'just
works'. Build with gcc 2.95 (not 3.x) to avoid problems on Solaris.
--
Bob Bishop
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> Well, the stab didn't go because nobody was interested 8-)
Sorry --- I was interested, but I didn't see your original message. This
problem has been biting me (and a client) in the ass for quite some time.
> I actually had in mind some farther-r
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:52:02PM +0200, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
> specialized things. The idea is that the program must send
> packets each T seconds. Ok, I know.. use the sleep, microsleep
> things, and it work
Hello hackers,
I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
specialized things. The idea is that the program must send
packets each T seconds. Ok, I know.. use the sleep, microsleep
things, and it works pretty well if the interval is greater than
1 msec. (recompiled the kernel wi
[ this is probably more appropriate for -net, -hackers bcc:'d ]
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:35:01AM +0100, andrew mejia wrote:
> [andrew]$ exactly what i would suggest. a single
> NIC can handle multiple assigments pretty easily,
> unless you're expecting mega-traffic. but even then
> you coul
* Patrick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 00:38] wrote:
>
> I have a large server that will be running ~24 jails, 8 of which will be
> running their own postgres server.
You should be aware of the kern.ipc.shm_use_phys sysctl, you might
want to try flipping it on if you encounter problems as
* andrew mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 00:37] wrote:
> anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
> BSD/Solaris machines?
>
> i'm trying to share out two 200gb plus raid arrays to
> a Mac LAN and will accept any information that can be
> offered.
1) This doesn't belong on -hackers.
I have a large server that will be running ~24 jails, 8 of which will be
running their own postgres server.
Because of this fact:
By default, Postgres allocates 34 semaphores, which is over half the
default system total of 60.
I need to tune kernel SHM settings in order to even run the second
anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
BSD/Solaris machines?
i'm trying to share out two 200gb plus raid arrays to
a Mac LAN and will accept any information that can be
offered.
thanks!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on
--- Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the FreeBSD ethernet interface
> isn't terribly
> > smart. Ideally, it would provide a virtual
> interface per VIP,
> > all the way down to the card; it doesn't.
>
> Probably wasn't very clear here.
>
> The
40 matches
Mail list logo
