M. Warner Losh wrote:
: Actually, it appears I'm wrong, and you just haven't read the
: message yet. Apparently there have been some commits which
: fix your problem for you (though they may be limited to -current).
Nope. They have been MFC'd as of April 30th or so. The entire wi
driver
Message sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
infected by virus and has not been delivered.
Viruses:
ÉÎÆÉÃÉÒÏ×ÁÎ Win32.HLLM.Klez.4
Original message was stored in the archive.
To receive original message please contact postmaster:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive record: archive.msg.GUWAGj
Antivirus
Aragon Gouveia wrote:
Can this sender be rejected at the MTA?
Better Idea, how about changing MajorDomo to accept mail only from people
registered on the list. OK. This would inconvience some people. But in
addition
to this, as most people are, I am also getting tired of the sex
Andy Sporner wrote:
Aragon Gouveia wrote:
Can this sender be rejected at the MTA?
Better Idea, how about changing MajorDomo to accept mail only from people
registered on the list. OK. This would inconvience some people. But in
addition
to this, as most people are, I am also
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Tore Lund wrote:
The reason for the inconvenience is that the list technology is behind
the times. Many other lists - like Yahoo! groups - have options like
NOMAIL and neat ways to peruse messages online. With such improvements
in place, anyone wanting to post could
Tore Lund wrote:
Better Idea, how about changing MajorDomo to accept mail only from people
registered on the list. OK. This would inconvience some people. But in
addition
to this, as most people are, I am also getting tired of the sex
advertisements.
The reason for the inconvenience is that
Greg Black wrote:
Andy Sporner wrote irrelevant stuff:
| Tore Lund wrote more irrelevant stuff:
Please take this debate off the hackers list. It has nothing to
do with the list's charter and is therefore unwelcome.
Greg
I disagree because I am making a suggestion of how to improve this
Thus spake Andy Sporner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Greg Black wrote:
Andy Sporner wrote irrelevant stuff:
| Tore Lund wrote more irrelevant stuff:
Please take this debate off the hackers list. It has nothing to
do with the list's charter and is therefore unwelcome.
Greg
I disagree
Hi,
We have a limited number of IBM Desktop PC's for sale:
Pentium 166 MMX, 2.5 Gb Hard Drive, 64 Mb RAM, 3.5 Floppy, 52x CD-Rom
drive, 15 SVGA Monitor, Keyboard and Mouse, with Windows 98 and Office XP
PRO pre-installed, all for £200.
For more info, visit us at www.ctek-uk.com/pc, email us
Hi!
I am just trying to write a simple IPv6 socket app.
after #including netinet/in.h I noticed that I have to include sys/types.h
BEFORE netinet/in.h which struck me as rather strange...
Should not .h files include the depending .h files themselves so that all
dependencies of type /
aaron wrote:
Hi,
Maybe it's just me, but I always include the fundamental .h files first, so
usually in this order (more or less):
#include sys/param.h
#include sys/types.h
... (networking stuff)
#include unistd.h
#include stdio.h
So perhaps this is why I never saw this. It is a simple
aaron wrote:
I am just trying to write a simple IPv6 socket app.
after #including netinet/in.h I noticed that I have to include sys/types.h
BEFORE netinet/in.h which struck me as rather strange...
Should not .h files include the depending .h files themselves so that all
dependencies of
On Tuesday 07 May 2002 18:37, Terry Lambert wrote:
Such an arrangement is called promiscuous includes.
ok, i see
Thanks for answering. I was under the impression that lots of linux apps rely
on promiscuous includes... so i expected them to be there in fbsd just as
well.. (but my memory
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 07:37:20PM +0200, aaron wrote:
On Tuesday 07 May 2002 18:37, Terry Lambert wrote:
Such an arrangement is called promiscuous includes.
ok, i see
Thanks for answering. I was under the impression that lots of linux apps rely
on promiscuous includes... so i
Two questions regarding the syncookies issue -
1. What kind of crash is it ? I have an issue where my machine has no
response at the console, and none of the services work (pop, imap, etc.)
HOWEVER you can still ping it, and you can still initiate connections to
services - they just dont talk
15 matches
Mail list logo
