srijit lahiri wrote:
I would like to have Cvsup installer for HP-UX along
with usage manual of Cvsupd. We would be synchronizing
Cvs sources located at HP-UX and Linux servers.
Any pointers would be highly appreciated.
The first thing you're going to need is a Modula III compiler
for your
mark tinguely wrote:
why don't you place the buffer pointer into an external mbuf.
this requires you to set several fields but you can use the macro
MCLGET as a reference.
You will also need to use the ext_free() pointer to a routine to correctly
free the buffer when the mbuf is released.
E.B. Dreger wrote:
Eclipse/BSD is based on 3.4, and one could play with it, but the
license looks incompatible.
I guess that's not a big deal, though, as anything would be
need to be written for 4-STABLE (or 5-CURRENT and MFCed to
4-STABLE). But the ideas certainly are interesting. :-)
John Polstra wrote:
Sorry, but CVSup is not supported under HP-UX. I do not have any
plans to port it to HP-UX in the future.
Would it compile with PM3, or does it require EZM3?
I think that would answer most of his question...
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
TL Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:34:33 -0700
TL From: Terry Lambert
TL Rice University has been doing that a lot with their
TL licenses, these days. I don't know if they would have done
TL this anyway, or if it's an overreaction on their part to
TL FreeBSD ignoring their patches.
Eclipse/BSD is a
* E.B. Dreger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020509 10:53] wrote:
TL Back to the original topic, though... you might want to ask
TL Alfred for his CPU affinity patches that he did. They are
...but this sounds more logical, anyway: Rather than hassling
with encumbered software, why not extend the
on a 2xPPRo, fresh TOT kernel as of today
panic: vm_object_terminate: freeing busy page 0xc0ddfea0 p-busy = 0, p-flags
c0dd
cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
Debugger(panic)
Stopped at Debugger+0x41: xorl%eax,%eax
db t
Debugger(c031293a) at Debugger+0x41
I've finally learned enough forth to put together a diff to implement some
nextboot functionality in the loader.
Basically, the loader peeks into the first line of /boot/nextboot.conf to
see if nextboot_enable=YES is there. If it is, it reads the entire
config, then rewrites the first
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
I've finally learned enough forth to put together a diff to implement some
nextboot functionality in the loader.
Basically, the loader peeks into the first line of /boot/nextboot.conf to
see if nextboot_enable=YES is there. If it is, it reads
On 09-May-2002 Matthew Jacob wrote:
on a 2xPPRo, fresh TOT kernel as of today
Try reverting alc's changes to remove Giant from some of the vm code and
see if that helps.
panic: vm_object_terminate: freeing busy page 0xc0ddfea0 p-busy = 0,
p-flags
c0dd
cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
I've finally learned enough forth to put together a diff to implement som
e
nextboot functionality in the loader.
Basically, the loader peeks into the first line of /boot/nextboot.conf to
see if nextboot_enable=YES is there. If it is, it reads the entire
config, then
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
I've finally learned enough forth to put together a diff to implement some
nextboot functionality in the loader.
Basically, the loader peeks into the first line of /boot/nextboot.conf to
see if nextboot_enable=YES is there. If it is, it reads
Just a reminder that the status reports are due tomorrow afternoon. Given
that it's been three months since the last, I'd like to have as many
projects reporting information as possible. A lot has happened in three
months, so there shouldn't be a problem finding things to say :-).
Robert N M
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
You're fooling yourself if you think that just because you're rewriting a
different file, something going wrong isn't going to hose the user
anyway.
True, but if I only hose /boot/nextboot.conf (which is going to be delete
when the machine enters
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:45:59PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Ian Noname wrote:
| The general rule is including includes from includes is bad.
|
| Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and
| differing opinions exist.
There's no shortage of opinions. They are
Hi
I have two FreeBSD boxes (4.5), running fine! (diskless)
The two machines have two networks interfaces. In the rc.conf file of
the both, are to ifconfig's (fxp0 e fxp1), but only one go up! Why?!
I did put the ifconfig command in /etc/network and have fixed the
problem. But i
Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The general rule is including includes from includes is bad.
Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and
differing opinions exist.
POSIX disagrees with you.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: The general rule is including includes from includes is bad.
:
: Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and
: differing opinions exist.
However, there are standards that state explicitly that
Michael Smith wrote:
I still think you're not thinking the processes associated with this
feature through carefully enough.
Liten to Mike; he is the loader guru.
I don't know how the file I/O is done for the YES/NO change,
since I have to have a couple of browsers open to read FORTH
code.
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
I still think you're not thinking the processes associated with this
feature through carefully enough.
Very possible. This was just a first cut of the feature and I'll be the
first to admit that it's not pretty. I don't know forth so I was happy
to get as far as I
Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
OK, time to check an actual example to see if the supposed reason
this is a GoodThing(tm) exists.
% man open
...
SYNOPSIS
#include fcntl.h
int
open(const char *path, int flags, ...);
...
% ed $inc/fcntl.h
...
/*
* This file includes
Terry Lambert [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote :
Michael Smith wrote:
I still think you're not thinking the processes associated with this
feature through carefully enough.
Liten to Mike; he is the loader guru.
I don't know how the file I/O is done for the YES/NO change,
since I have to
: The general rule is including includes from includes is bad.
Correct me if I am wrong; doesn't the curses library do this. I saw in
one of Eric's (Raymond) documentation about it. Also, have a look at:
:= src/sys/dev/vinum/vinumhdr.h
JFYI. :-)
-- Hiten
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The general rule is including includes from includes is bad.
Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and
differing opinions exist.
POSIX disagrees with you.
Can't we just teach the lions to eat grass?
Do we have soft interrupts?
Here's a bit of code from the NetBSD usb stack, and I'm trying to work
out what it would be in FreeBSDland.
sc-sc_bus-soft = softintr_establish(IPL_SOFTNET,
sc-sc_bus-methods-soft_intr, sc-sc_bus);
if (sc-sc_bus-soft == NULL) {
Josef Karthauser wrote:
Do we have soft interrupts?
Yes. The easiest one to use is NETISR. Software interrupts
are called from reenabling hardware interrupts. See _doreti
in /sys/i386/isa/ipl.s
static void
ipintr(void)
{
...
}
void
ip_init()
{
...
Title: Friend, Here Are Your 2 FREE Airline Tickets
Dear Friend,
I have your certificate for
Two
FREE Airline Tickets.
They're FREE, but I need to know where to send them.
Click Here and complete the form.
Two FREE airline tickets valued up to $2100.00 to your
choice of resort
Josef Karthauser wrote:
Do we have soft interrupts?
Here's a bit of code from the NetBSD usb stack, and I'm trying to work
out what it would be in FreeBSDland.
sc-sc_bus-soft = softintr_establish(IPL_SOFTNET,
sc-sc_bus-methods-soft_intr, sc-sc_bus);
if
Peter Wemm wrote:
You probably want to have a good look at usb_ethersubr.c - it does this
sort of thing already, but for different reasons. On FreeBSD, the usb
hardware interrupts ran (pre-SMPng) as bio, not net. All of the
assumptions, problems and workarounds for this from pre-SMPng are
Thank you for taking the time to read this
email.
I am a student at the New York Film Academy - www.nyfa.com
I amplanning to make a short romantic film
entitled "From St. Petersburg with Love", in which a Frenchman, living in New
York City, falls in love with a beautiful Russian woman
Has the POSIX event standard implemeted in FreeBSD? POSIX events are logged to
a file. Which would give a better performance, assuming kevent can register more
events?
Thanks.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
31 matches
Mail list logo
