Re: Cvsup Installables for HP-UX and Usage manual for cvsupd

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
srijit lahiri wrote: > I would like to have Cvsup installer for HP-UX along > with usage manual of Cvsupd. We would be synchronizing > Cvs sources located at HP-UX and Linux servers. > > Any pointers would be highly appreciated. The first thing you're going to need is a Modula III compiler for y

Re: Mbuf questions

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
mark tinguely wrote: > why don't you place the buffer pointer into an external mbuf. > this requires you to set several fields but you can use the macro > MCLGET as a reference. > > You will also need to use the ext_free() pointer to a routine to correctly > free the buffer when the mbuf is relea

Re: per-user or -proc CPU reservation and limits

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
"E.B. Dreger" wrote: > Eclipse/BSD is based on 3.4, and one could play with it, but the > license looks incompatible. > > I guess that's not a big deal, though, as anything would be > need to be written for 4-STABLE (or 5-CURRENT and MFCed to > 4-STABLE). But the ideas certainly are interesting.

Re: Cvsup Installables for HP-UX and Usage manual for cvsupd

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
John Polstra wrote: > Sorry, but CVSup is not supported under HP-UX. I do not have any > plans to port it to HP-UX in the future. Would it compile with PM3, or does it require EZM3? I think that would answer most of his question... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: per-user or -proc CPU reservation and limits

2002-05-09 Thread E.B. Dreger
TL> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:34:33 -0700 TL> From: Terry Lambert TL> Rice University has been doing that a lot with their TL> licenses, these days. I don't know if they would have done TL> this anyway, or if it's an overreaction on their part to TL> FreeBSD ignoring their patches. Eclipse/BSD

Re: per-user or -proc CPU reservation and limits

2002-05-09 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* E.B. Dreger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020509 10:53] wrote: > > TL> Back to the original topic, though... you might want to ask > TL> Alfred for his CPU affinity patches that he did. They are > > ...but this sounds more logical, anyway: Rather than hassling > with encumbered software, why not exte

vm panics: keep on getting these panics ....

2002-05-09 Thread Matthew Jacob
on a 2xPPRo, fresh TOT kernel as of today panic: vm_object_terminate: freeing busy page 0xc0ddfea0 p->busy = 0, p->flags c0dd cpuid = 0; lapic.id = Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x41: xorl%eax,%eax db> t Debugger(c031293a) at Debugger+0x41 panic(c032bee0,c0ddfea0,0,c0

Re: nextboot loader diff

2002-05-09 Thread Michael Smith
> I've finally learned enough forth to put together a diff to implement some > nextboot functionality in the loader. > > Basically, the loader peeks into the first line of /boot/nextboot.conf to > see if nextboot_enable="YES" is there. If it is, it reads the entire > config, then rewrites the

Re: nextboot loader diff

2002-05-09 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Michael Smith wrote: > > I've finally learned enough forth to put together a diff to implement some > > nextboot functionality in the loader. > > > > Basically, the loader peeks into the first line of /boot/nextboot.conf to > > see if nextboot_enable="YES" is there. If it i

RE: vm panics: keep on getting these panics ....

2002-05-09 Thread John Baldwin
On 09-May-2002 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > on a 2xPPRo, fresh TOT kernel as of today Try reverting alc's changes to remove Giant from some of the vm code and see if that helps. > panic: vm_object_terminate: freeing busy page 0xc0ddfea0 p->busy = 0, > p->flags > c0dd > > cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 000

Re: nextboot loader diff

2002-05-09 Thread Michael Smith
> > > I've finally learned enough forth to put together a diff to implement som > e > > > nextboot functionality in the loader. > > > > > > Basically, the loader peeks into the first line of /boot/nextboot.conf to > > > > see if nextboot_enable="YES" is there. If it is, it reads the entire >

Re: nextboot loader diff

2002-05-09 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Michael Smith wrote: > > I've finally learned enough forth to put together a diff to implement some > > nextboot functionality in the loader. > > > > Basically, the loader peeks into the first line of /boot/nextboot.conf to > > see if nextboot_enable="YES" is there. If it i

Request for submissions: FreeBSD Bi-Monthly Development Status Report (fwd)

2002-05-09 Thread Robert Watson
Just a reminder that the status reports are due tomorrow afternoon. Given that it's been three months since the last, I'd like to have as many projects reporting information as possible. A lot has happened in three months, so there shouldn't be a problem finding things to say :-). Robert N M Wa

Re: nextboot loader diff

2002-05-09 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Michael Smith wrote: > You're fooling yourself if you think that just because you're rewriting a > different file, "something going wrong" isn't going to hose the user > anyway. True, but if I only hose /boot/nextboot.conf (which is going to be delete when the machine enter

Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h

2002-05-09 Thread Damon Anton Permezel
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:45:59PM +1000, Greg Black wrote: > Ian Noname wrote: > > | > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad". > | > | Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and > | differing opinions exist. > > There's no shortage of opinions.

rc.conf

2002-05-09 Thread O Senhor
Hi I have two FreeBSD boxes (4.5), running fine! (diskless) The two machines have two networks interfaces. In the rc.conf file of the both, are to ifconfig's (fxp0 e fxp1), but only one go up! Why?! I did put the ifconfig command in /etc/network and have fixed the problem. But i don't

Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h

2002-05-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad". > Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and > differing opinions exist. POSIX disagrees with you. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send ma

Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h

2002-05-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad". : : Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and : differing opinions exist. However, there are standards that state explicitl

Re: nextboot loader diff

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Michael Smith wrote: > I still think you're not thinking the processes associated with this > feature through carefully enough. Liten to Mike; he is the loader guru. I don't know how the file I/O is done for the "YES/NO" change, since I have to have a couple of browsers open to read FORTH code.

Re: nextboot loader diff

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > I still think you're not thinking the processes associated with this > > feature through carefully enough. > > Very possible. This was just a first cut of the feature and I'll be the > first to admit that it's not pretty. I don't know forth so I was happy > to get as far

Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Damon Anton Permezel wrote: > OK, time to check an actual example to see if the supposed reason > this is a GoodThing(tm) exists. > > % man open > > ... > SYNOPSIS > #include > > int > open(const char *path, int flags, ...); > ... > > % ed $inc/fcntl.h > ... > /* > * This file

Re: nextboot loader diff

2002-05-09 Thread Jonathan Mini
Terry Lambert [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote : > Michael Smith wrote: > > I still think you're not thinking the processes associated with this > > feature through carefully enough. > > Liten to Mike; he is the loader guru. > > I don't know how the file I/O is done for the "YES/NO" change, > since I

Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h

2002-05-09 Thread Hiten Pandya
> : > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad". Correct me if I am wrong; doesn't the curses library do this. I saw in one of Eric's (Raymond) documentation about it. Also, have a look at: := src/sys/dev/vinum/vinumhdr.h JFYI. :-) -- Hiten __

Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad". > > Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and > > differing opinions exist. > > POSIX disagrees with you. "Can't we just teach the lions to

Soft interrupts

2002-05-09 Thread Josef Karthauser
Do we have soft interrupts? Here's a bit of code from the NetBSD usb stack, and I'm trying to work out what it would be in FreeBSDland. sc->sc_bus->soft = softintr_establish(IPL_SOFTNET, sc->sc_bus->methods->soft_intr, sc->sc_bus); if (sc->sc_bus->soft == NULL) {

Re: Soft interrupts

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Josef Karthauser wrote: > Do we have soft interrupts? Yes. The easiest one to use is NETISR. Software interrupts are called from reenabling hardware interrupts. See _doreti in /sys/i386/isa/ipl.s static void ipintr(void) { ... } void ip_init() { ... register_netisr(NE

Friend, Here Are Your 2 FREE Airline Tickets

2002-05-09 Thread American Homeowners Association
Title: Friend, Here Are Your 2 FREE Airline Tickets Dear Friend, I have your certificate for Two FREE Airline Tickets. They're FREE, but I need to know where to send them. Click Here and complete the form. Two FREE airline tickets valued up to $2100.00 to your choice of resort des

Re: Soft interrupts

2002-05-09 Thread Peter Wemm
Josef Karthauser wrote: > Do we have soft interrupts? > > Here's a bit of code from the NetBSD usb stack, and I'm trying to work > out what it would be in FreeBSDland. > > sc->sc_bus->soft = softintr_establish(IPL_SOFTNET, > sc->sc_bus->methods->soft_intr, sc->sc_bus); >

Re: Soft interrupts

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Peter Wemm wrote: > You probably want to have a good look at usb_ethersubr.c - it does this > sort of thing already, but for different reasons. On FreeBSD, the usb > hardware interrupts ran (pre-SMPng) as bio, not net. All of the > assumptions, problems and workarounds for this from pre-SMPng ar

Looking for a russian actress to take part in a film project

2002-05-09 Thread Guy Levallois
Thank you for taking the time to read this email.   I am a student at the New York Film Academy - www.nyfa.com   I am planning to make a short romantic film entitled "From St. Petersburg with Love", in which a Frenchman, living in New York City, falls in love with a beautiful Russian woman f

kevent subsystem

2002-05-09 Thread Ramkumar Chinchani
Has the POSIX event standard implemeted in FreeBSD? POSIX events are logged to a file. Which would give a better performance, assuming kevent can register more events? Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: configuring X on a vaio pcg-c1vp

2002-05-09 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
[ wondering if this will make it to the list since hub.freebsd.org seems to be dropping mail from me lately ] [ assuming the above evaluates as true I've attempted to redirect this to -mobile, where it belongs ] On Wed, 8 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: >Neil Bliss wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> Doe

Re: kevent subsystem

2002-05-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Ramkumar Chinchani wrote: > Has the POSIX event standard implemeted in FreeBSD? POSIX events are logged to > a file. Which would give a better performance, assuming kevent can register more > events? Are you talking about POSIX persistent queueing, of the type not implemented by the POSIX printin

ebay users submit your site F6qd8-JK8m-NoNvIE

2002-05-09 Thread submitNQRfWW
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00M5_46Q67S8U.V3897Z11"

Re: Difference between RELENG_* and RELENG_*_BP

2002-05-09 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Leo Bicknell wrote: >At the end of the day, we need to lower the barrier to adding >documentation, while increasing the quality. Far from an easy task. I agree with your point. It would be nice to break down barriers to documentation. However, I don't think any of the sugg

Re: configuring X on a vaio pcg-c1vp

2002-05-09 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: >[ assuming the above evaluates as true I've attempted to redirect this >to -mobile, where it belongs ] Obviously the floodgates just opened and my mail poured forth. I am currently investigating the delay in mail propagation between smtp.comcast.