"Mark W. Krentel" wrote:
> Dump still works on a mounted file system in Freebsd, right? That is,
> a write that completes before dump is started will be in the dump,
> even if the data is in memory? I don't mean writing to a file during
> the dump, that's a separate problem.
>
> I only recently
Greetings,
The fact that FreeBSD does not beep after it finishes shutting down has
costed me dozens of hours of reformatting inconsistent filesystems, and
probably all sorts of little bits of data loss which I'm just unaware of.
I've tried to hack this into the kernel myself, without much luck. T
In message <002101c22d73$972ec970$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Sean Hamilton" wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>The fact that FreeBSD does not beep after it finishes shutting down has
>costed me dozens of hours of reformatting inconsistent filesystems, and
>probably all sorts of little bits of data loss which I'm jus
* Sean Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-17 02:23 -0700]:
> Greetings,
>
> The fact that FreeBSD does not beep after it finishes shutting down has
> costed me dozens of hours of reformatting inconsistent filesystems, and
> probably all sorts of little bits of data loss which I'm just unaware
From: "Takanori Watanabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Anybody clueful want to point me in the right direction?
>
> Following patch is Chiharu Shibata's patch for old 4-stable.
> The article on the patch is published in
> FreeBSD press(http://www.ux.mycom.co.jp/).
>
> http://plaza17.mbn.or.jp/~chi/mypro
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:45:29AM -0700, Sean Hamilton wrote:
> From: "Takanori Watanabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Anybody clueful want to point me in the right direction?
> >
> > Following patch is Chiharu Shibata's patch for old 4-stable.
> > The article on the patch is published in
> > FreeBSD
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 01:54:04PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Stephane E. Potvin" wrote:
> > > How often must this be allocated?
> > >
> > > How many of them are needed?
> > >
> > > If you only need a small set number of them, then they can be
> > > allocated very early on in the system lifeti
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:29:53AM -0400, Mark W. Krentel wrote:
> I only recently learned that this doesn't work in Linux and I wanted
> to check that it's (still?) ok in Freebsd. Apparently, in the 2.4
> Linux kernels, the buffer and page caches make it impossible for dump
> to always get the c
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Alex Dupre wrote:
> > In normal situation accessing to a FreeBSD 4.x machine from cygwin is not
> > very pleasant: editing files is quite a pain, there are many terminal
> > "glitches" like the cursor in the wrong position and garbage text.
>
> Sounds l
I got a panic on 4.5-STABLE with ffs_blkfree: bad size. I've searched
through the mailing lists archives without finding anything. Can anyone
help me trace down what the problem is?
Thanks!
david
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
(davidp) gc02:/tmp$ uname -a
FreeBSD gc02.nnrp.aus1.gi
Sean Hamilton wrote:
> The fact that FreeBSD does not beep after it finishes shutting down has
> costed me dozens of hours of reformatting inconsistent filesystems, and
> probably all sorts of little bits of data loss which I'm just unaware of.
> I've tried to hack this into the kernel myself, wit
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:09:15PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Brian Reichert wrote:
> > Can someone suggest the be FreeBSD mailing list wherein I could
> > explore issues I'm having with trying to build a 4.6-STABLE release
> > on a 4.5-RELEASE box?
> >
> > I don't know if this is a -hackers q
Hi there...
I seem to have some problems with running strace (A program that
traces system calls, signals, and processes, in the ports:
devel/strace) on FreeBSD.
The problem is that the binary executable is not traced (it runs as a
forked process of strace, but in the background of the shell). Th
Brian Reichert wrote:
> What I had hoped to do was maintain a single build box, on
> which I could maintain the presence of several releases.
>
> I had explored trying to mirror various FTP archives, but I was
> finding difficult to gauge what I needed for diskspace, and how to
> selectively pare
I was asking around in #freebsdhelp on EFNet what the equivalent of
GetTickCount() in the Win32 API is in FreeBSD.
I need a way to properly determine passage of time that is not affected if I
change the system clock for example. The only way I'm aware that you can do
that is by counting the numbe
Andrei Cojocaru wrote:
> I was asking around in #freebsdhelp on EFNet what the equivalent of
> GetTickCount() in the Win32 API is in FreeBSD.
>
> I need a way to properly determine passage of time that is not affected if I
> change the system clock for example. The only way I'm aware that you can
* Andrei Cojocaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020717 12:02] wrote:
> I was asking around in #freebsdhelp on EFNet what the equivalent of
> GetTickCount() in the Win32 API is in FreeBSD.
>
> I need a way to properly determine passage of time that is not affected if I
> change the system clock for example
I had sent this mail already, but was not sure if it reached... as I had not
registered previously... I would very much appreciate help on thi topic...
Regards,
-Vani.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sabapathi, Vanishree
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:11 AM
> To: '[EMAIL P
rdtsc() will give you cycle counts since system boot. It reads a Pentium
internal register which is incremented at every CPU internal clock cycle.
Deepankar
Andrei Cojocaru wrote:
> I was asking around in #freebsdhelp on EFNet what the equivalent of
> GetTickCount() in the Win32 API is in FreeB
In message <00d501c22dc4$57d08b00$0200a8c0@twothousand>, "Andrei
Cojocaru" writ
es:
> I was asking around in #freebsdhelp on EFNet what the equivalent of
> GetTickCount() in the Win32 API is in FreeBSD.
>
> I need a way to properly determine passage of time that is not affected if I
> change the
doesn't fit my criteria since it changes, bah I'll just use gettimeofday since it's a
portable API and hope the computers I run it on don't change their blocks by too
much...
- Original Message -
From: "Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrei Cojocaru" <[E
Andrei Cojocaru wrote:
>
> doesn't fit my criteria since it changes, bah I'll just use
> gettimeofday since it's a portable API and hope the computers I run
> it on don't change their blocks by too much...
If you're really worried about it, get a GPS device that can provide
you with a PPS signal
I am already synchronizing using xntp, that's not the problem. The problem is by some
weird way the clock got out of sync by about 1hr during daylight switch on one of the
computers I run, and I need a reliable way to get passage of time (I don't need
date/time, just the passage of it) for diff
depending on the acuracy needed use the uptime..
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message <005f01c22dd1$7be7d180$0300a8c0@fivehundred>, "Andrei Cojocaru" writ
es:
>I am already synchronizing using xntp, that's not the problem. The
>problem is by some weird way the clock got out of sync by about 1hr
>during daylight switch on one of the computers I run, and I need a
>reliable
yes but how do you get the uptime?
- Original Message -
From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Darren Pilgrim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Andrei Cojocaru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cy Schubert - CITS Open
Systems Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 1
> I need a way to properly determine passage of time
> that is not affected if I change the system clock
> for example.
how about using setitimer(2) - ITIMER_REAL?
since it appears(?) on almost all unix(-like)
platforms this expires based only on callout (or
jiffies) ticks countdown, and setti
Hello everyone,
I've got a problem I'm hoping that someone out there can help
solve (surprise, surprise!).
I've got a bunch of capture cards that use 4 Conexant BT878A
capture chips connected through a single HiNT HB1 bridge chip.
When I've tried connecting multiple BT878's directly to the m
Hi! I'm managing the PowerList mailing list.
I'm sorry, I've been unable to carry out your request,
since the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
was not on the PowerList mailing list when I received
your request and is not a subscriber of this list.
If you unsubscribe, but continue to receive mail,
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: If you're really worried about it, get a GPS device that can provide
: you with a PPS signal for use with ntpd. Then I'd say you could safely
: rely on the computer's clock being accurate.
If you are lucky e
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: In message <005f01c22dd1$7be7d180$0300a8c0@fivehundred>, "Andrei Cojocaru" writ
: es:
: >I am already synchronizing using xntp, that's not the problem. The
: >problem is by some weird way the clock got out
"M. Warner Losh" wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : If you're really worried about it, get a GPS device that can provide
> : you with a PPS signal for use with ntpd. Then I'd say you could safely
> : rely on the computer's cloc
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: "M. Warner Losh" wrote:
: >
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : If you're really worried about it, get a GPS device that can provide
: > : you
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>: In message <005f01c22dd1$7be7d180$0300a8c0@fivehundred>, "Andrei Cojocaru" writ
>: es:
>: >I am already synchronizing using xntp, that's not the p
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Unless we want to deal properly with leapseconds and implement TAI,
: we have no choice in that matter.
Well, djm has libraries that keeps the system time in UTC +
leapseconds and causes the right time to
Andrei Cojocaru wrote:
> I am already synchronizing using xntp, that's not the problem. The problem is by
>some weird way the clock got out of sync by about 1hr during daylight switch on one
>of the computers I run, and I need a reliable way to get passage of time (I don't
>need date/time, just
36 matches
Mail list logo
