Lars Eggert wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> Well, the showstopper is in vinum. The fact that ccd(4) works
>> seamlessly with GEOM is testament to this.
>
>
> For some reason I was under the (mis?)impression that ccd was no longer
> being maintained... If it works with geom, we can prob
At 9:02 PM +0200 10/4/02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>There are numerous architectural issues which have never been
>fixed in vinum, and one or more of these bits now.
>
>Whoever loves vinum will have to chase it/them down and fix it.
>
>If I receive patches or requests for changes to GEOM as result
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel E
> ischen writes:
> >On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> >> lian Elischer writes:
> >>
> >> >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new featu
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
> >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the
> >responsibility to make older subsystems work.
>
> I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that:
>
> When will you have made KSE work on spa
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Oh, you mean like KSE on Alpha?
> >
> > What existing functionality on the alpha does KSE stop?
>
> So you agree that requiring vinum users to turn off GEOM is ok? Part
> of adding a new feature is providing proof of concept that it works
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel E
ischen writes:
>On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
>> lian Elischer writes:
>>
>> >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the
>> >responsibility to make older subsystems work.
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
>
> >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the
> >responsibility to make older subsystems work.
>
> I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that:
>
> When will you
On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >
>> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
>> >> >This is a cryptographically si
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
>
> >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the
> >responsibility to make older subsystems work.
>
> I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that:
>
> When will you h
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
> >> >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
> >> >
> >> >-
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the
>responsibility to make older subsystems work.
I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that:
When will you have made KSE work on sparc64 and ia64 ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp
On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
>> >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
>> >
>> >--ms040706010906030302070807
>> >Content-Type: text/plain; chars
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
> >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
> >
> >--ms040706010906030302070807
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> >Content-Transfer-Encod
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
>>
>>I'd consider not having vinum work under geom a show-stopper... at least
>>until geom can stripe.
>
>
> Well, the showstopper is in vinum. The fact that ccd(4) works
> seamlessly with GEOM is testament to this.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
>This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
>
>--ms040706010906030302070807
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> I would need to
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I would need to look at the code to be able to tell, I don't have
> time for that.
I'd consider not having vinum work under geom a show-stopper... at least
until geom can stripe.
Lars
--
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> USC Information Sciences Institute
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, n0go013 writes
:
>On 04.10-18:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message n0go013 writes :
>> >On 04.10-15:40, fergus wrote:
>> > > On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> > > [...]
>> > > > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inventory of disks in
>> > >
On 04.10-18:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message n0go013 writes :
> >On 04.10-15:40, fergus wrote:
> > > On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inventory of disks in
> > > > the system, so can I get you to try again making sure
In the past few months, there have been a number of threads in the
FreeBSD lists regarding 'tar'. I have a 'tartools' distribution
which may address some of the concerns expressed, but I have not
responded to those threads for a couple of reasons.
1) I don't want to start any 'tar wars' (my li
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bakul Shah writes:
>Oh well.
>I am not going to argue about this over and over and over
>again.
Thankyou, a very wise decision sir!
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer |
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bakul Shah writes:
> >How hard would it be to bring back block devices without GEOM?
>
> Not at all hard, pretty trivial in fact.
The easiest way is to restore the old code and use a minor number hack or
ioctl to enab
Bakul Shah wrote:
> phk writes:
> > You are welcome to peruse the mail-archives to find out such
> > historically interesting decisions.
>
> I am aware of the technical arguments discussed via -arch,
> -current & -hackers. I just don't agree with them (seems
> like most hackers who are afraid to
22 matches
Mail list logo