Thus spake Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> :The concern was that there could be a race where the process is
> :swapped out again after I have swapped it back in but before I can
> :dirty its pages. (Perhaps I need to hold the process lock a bit
> :longer.) Under heavy swapping load, swapof
_
Looking to be employed? We have an ocean of employers and employees waiting to be
matched. Go to Maktoob Jobs NOW.
http://www.maktoob.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body
You might also want to try ccache (http://ccache.samba.org/). Similar
idea (related authors!), except that instead of distributing the
preprocessor output, it hashes it and uses the hash to pull the object
file from a cache. I haven't used it for buildworld, but I do use it for
most of my daily
:The concern was that there could be a race where the process is
:swapped out again after I have swapped it back in but before I can
:dirty its pages. (Perhaps I need to hold the process lock a bit
:longer.) Under heavy swapping load, swapoff() is failing to find
:a single page about one time ou
On 12-Oct-2002 Shiao Yeh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tied to save the kernel core dump following Michael Lucas instructions, but
> it only works when the kernel is already loaded. I am experiencing kernel trap
> during kernel boot, and the show disk/device and ddb> call setdumpdev
> (0xf000b444) does n
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 16:09:47 +0300:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:14:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300:
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > > In any event, could someone point me to a place in
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:14:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page
> > > where it says that the S and
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page
> > where it says that the S and C modifiers dereference variables given in
> > both the pattern and repla
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> continuing my make adventure, I've stumbled across the following
> inconsistency. I would even call it a bug.
>
> In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page
> where it says that the S an
Hi there,
continuing my make adventure, I've stumbled across the following
inconsistency. I would even call it a bug.
In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page
where it says that the S and C modifiers dereference variables given in
both the pattern and replacement,
[ Latest patches at http://csua.berkeley.edu/~das/swapoff.patch3 ]
Thus spake Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> :I'm worried that vm_proc_swapin_all() has a similar race with the
> :swapout daemon. Presently I assume that my references to the
> :UPAGES object and the associated pages remain
11 matches
Mail list logo
