DIPLOMADO EN COMERCIO ELECTRÓNICO

2002-11-21 Thread Dir.Academica
UNIVERSIDAD EN LINEA - ASESORES VIRTUALES Facultad Virtual de Computación e Informática INVITACIÓN Señor (a), Usuario de internet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] tengo el agrado de invitarle a usted y circulo amistoso laboral, en participar de nuestro 5to diplomado de gestión en comercio electrónico

mmap2 implementation for winex

2002-11-21 Thread Kenneth Culver
Hi, I recently installed linux winex (again) now that I have working nVidia drivers. However I found that almost nothing worked and there was a message about mmap2 not being implemented. I implemented it, but I'm not sure if it's done right... because some things started working after I imp

Re: Changing socket buffer timeout to a u_long?

2002-11-21 Thread Terry Lambert
Nate Lawson wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > FWIW: upping the roll-over rate is not a good reason to increase > > the size of fields, unless you want to increase the TCP sequence > > number filed to 64 bits? ...it has exactly the same issues at > > high data rates. > > That'

Re: Changing socket buffer timeout to a u_long?

2002-11-21 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > FWIW: upping the roll-over rate is not a good reason to increase > the size of fields, unless you want to increase the TCP sequence > number filed to 64 bits? ...it has exactly the same issues at > high data rates. That's what the timestamp option does

Re: Changing socket buffer timeout to a u_long?

2002-11-21 Thread Terry Lambert
Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, David G. Andersen wrote: > > Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer > > timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores > > the number of ticks before the socket operation times out. > > > > At present, the maximum SO_RCV

Re: Changing socket buffer timeout to a u_long?

2002-11-21 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David G. Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer > timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores > the number of ticks before the socket operation times out. I already changed it from short to in

Re: Changing socket buffer timeout to a u_long?

2002-11-21 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, David G. Andersen wrote: > > > Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer > > timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores > > the number of ticks before the socket operation times out. > > > > -Da

Re: Serial Tunnelling

2002-11-21 Thread Julian Elischer
use netgraph... The ng_tty node connects directly to a tty port that can be connected directly to a ng_ksocket node that can be bound to a udp port and address of another ksocket node somewhere else, which is attached to a ng-tty node there.. Anything coming in one port will be bound up in a udp

Re: Changing socket buffer timeout to a u_long?

2002-11-21 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, David G. Andersen wrote: > Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer > timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores > the number of ticks before the socket operation times out. > > At present, the maximum SO_RCVTIMEO or SO_SNDTIMEO value one

Serial Tunnelling

2002-11-21 Thread Richard Luckhurst
Hi list I am trying to sort out a problem with a set up for a client. I have 2 PC's with 8 port serial cards in them and they work fine under freebsd. At present I have the 8 ports connected to ports in /etc/services and I can telnet to these ports OK. The idea is I want to push serial data in a

Changing socket buffer timeout to a u_long?

2002-11-21 Thread David G. Andersen
Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores the number of ticks before the socket operation times out. At present, the maximum SO_RCVTIMEO or SO_SNDTIMEO value one can set is SHRT_MAX / hz. With a 100Hz kernel, this comes

Re: Assembly and ELF

2002-11-21 Thread dslb
On 2002.11.21 18:33 Chuck Tuffli wrote: > > My questions are: > > 1. Can you guide my to some good info on asm programming under > FreeBSD (I > > have read www.int80h.org/bsdasm) > > There is > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/x86.html > > I'm not sure if this

Re: Assembly and ELF

2002-11-21 Thread dslb
On 2002.11.21 18:33 Chuck Tuffli wrote: > There is > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/x86.html > > I'm not sure if this is the same as the above link I'll read it, thanks :-) br socketd To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebs

Re: Assembly and ELF

2002-11-21 Thread dslb
On 2002.11.21 18:00 Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > One big question I'd have is, why are you using assembly language? 1. I like assembly 2. FreeBSD will still need assembly programms 3. To learn more about the FreeBSD kernel (internals) I do however program in C++, so if you are worried about portabi

Re: Assembly and ELF

2002-11-21 Thread dslb
On 2002.11.21 17:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I can't remember if I'm on the list, so please CC to me. Just found out I'm on the list :-) br socketd To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Assembly and ELF

2002-11-21 Thread dslb
Hi FreeBSD lovers I can't remember if I'm on the list, so please CC to me. I used to program in C++ and assembly under windows, but now I only run FreeBSD (4.7). I have to get used to not playing with BIOS interrupts and direct hardware accessing, but I'll live. My questions are: 1. Can you guide

Re: Playing with Current.

2002-11-21 Thread Ryan Sommers
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 22:13, Ryan Sommers wrote: > My question is could I keep and build the CURRENT source tree on the > FreeBSD desktop, mount it over NFS to the laptop, and install it over > the NFS mount? Is the kernel on the 5.0SP2 ISO built with PCCard support? I installed from CD-ROM onto

Re: Pcap

2002-11-21 Thread soheil soheil
Hi Have You any sample ? and i want to know how the packet is writen on pcap buffer and how they will forward ? if they are forwarded after the saving or they will never be forwarded ? i mean that is this scenario true ? or not packet > ip_input -copy of packet---> writen to pcap

Re: cvs commit: src/bin/sleep sleep.c

2002-11-21 Thread Tony Finch
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:02:30PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Most of the BSS is mmapped zero pages that are copy-on-write, so in simple > > programs they should be mostly shared. See rtld-elf/map_object.c > > Once those pages are written to,

Re: kernel basic block profiling

2002-11-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harti Brandt wri tes: >${subject} seems not to work on -current. First of all 'man kernbb' tells >me to compile at least one kernel file with '-a'. Well, gcc tells me that >it doesn't know anything about '-a'. After some grepping in the gcc >sources I came to the co

kernel basic block profiling

2002-11-21 Thread Harti Brandt
Hi, ${subject} seems not to work on -current. First of all 'man kernbb' tells me to compile at least one kernel file with '-a'. Well, gcc tells me that it doesn't know anything about '-a'. After some grepping in the gcc sources I came to the conclusion, that -fprofile-arcs is what it wants. But e