Just take a look at http://garage.freebsd.pl
Works fine with 4.7RELEASE
Henk
Terry Lambert wrote:
Mike Ghunt wrote:
Has anyone hacked the jail code to support more than one ip?
Yes. There was a patch posted by someone about 9 months ago.
Would it be wise to hack at the code to add
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:52:07PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Rashim Gupta wrote:
I have a machine to which I remotely log in and do
kernel programming. It has two kernel versions - one is WORKING and the
other is TEST - the one I am presently working on. Is it possible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Ghunt) wrote:
Has anyone hacked the jail code to support more than one ip?
Would it be wise to hack at the code to add such a feature?
Probably the best way to address this issue is to incorporate the
network stack virtualization patch, then change the jail ID from
an
Rashim Gupta wrote:
I have a machine to which I remotely log in and do
kernel programming. It has two kernel versions - one is WORKING and the
other is TEST - the one I am presently working on. Is it possible that
the bootloader tries to first load TEST but in case TEST panics then
it loads
Terry Lambert wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Ghunt) wrote:
Has anyone hacked the jail code to support more than one ip?
Would it be wise to hack at the code to add such a feature?
Probably the best way to address this issue is to incorporate the
network stack
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:49:03AM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
The time select() takes should be directly related to your system's hz
setting. The default for FreeBSD is 100, which means that the interrupt
timer will fire every 10ms. If you want to play with that, edit
/etc/sysctl.conf and
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:54:28PM +0300, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE KRNLCONFDIR shouldn't be overridden -- we already provide (undocumented)
RE user-redefineable KERNCONFDIR which should be used in cases like this.
RE KRNLCONFDIR, on the other hand,
Hi people,
Can it be so that kernel maxusers=768 value being more than 512 leads to
spontaneous system freezes which can take up to several hours when the
system is just sleeping (only replying to ping) and doing nothing else,
not allowing to telnet or anything. The system is 4.5-STABLE with much
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Stijn Hoop wrote:
With the mentioned change of /etc/sysctl.conf to /boot/loader.conf, I am
indeed seeing much better times on this 'benchmark'. See attached log. Not
only the _select_sleep method benefits from this. What are the reasons *not*
to do this?
As to why
Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:49:03AM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
The time select() takes should be directly related to your system's hz
setting. The default for FreeBSD is 100, which means that the interrupt
timer will fire every 10ms. If you want to play with that, edit
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:01:43PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Stijn Hoop wrote:
With the mentioned change of /etc/sysctl.conf to /boot/loader.conf, I am
indeed seeing much better times on this 'benchmark'. See attached log. Not
only the _select_sleep method benefits
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:06:16AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
[snip]
Increased context switch overhead.
Yes, Mike's explanation was clear.
Actually, for the case you are talking about, your emulator should
be using aggregate instead of discrete timeouts, and you would not
be having a
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On the other hand, a higher HZ should create a system which runs a bit
smoother for interactive programs. And, as you point out, it is necessary
for good timing in emulators / simulators / dummynet.
Higher hardclock rate. It affects dummynet because most of the
work it
Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:06:16AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Actually, for the case you are talking about, your emulator should
be using aggregate instead of discrete timeouts, and you would not
be having a problem. It's not useful to do 100 1ms timeouts to
achieve a
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Stijn Hoop wrote:
In short, I don't think the issue has been discussed much, partially
because it's so easy for those who want hz=1000 to just edit loader.conf.
If you want to propose that we switch to hz=1000 by default:
Nah, I'll leave that to someone who has some
Hello Gents,
ldconfig -r does find other libraries in /usr/local/lib:
root@mail:~# ldconfig -r | grep local
search directories: /usr/lib:/usr/local/lib
67:-lltdl.1 = /usr/local/lib/libltdl.so.1
68:-ldb3.3 = /usr/local/lib/libdb3.so.3
69:-ldb3_cxx.3 =
Hello,
I can't seem to use my new external firewire hard disk :
(this is with 5.0-DP2, there are the same kinds of symptoms under 4.7-Stable)
My main question is to know where the problems are : is the hard disk dead ?
is the firewire/ATA bridge fried ? are all problems due to the driver ?
FWIW, my first X11 game I ever wrote, which was similar to the
game LodeRunner, used a select() timeout for the timing loop
select(),nanosleep(),poll(),etc all sleep one tick longer _except_
when previous syscall was interrupted by a signal or when input
became available.
this is due to
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hello,
I can't seem to use my new external firewire hard disk : (this is
with 5.0-DP2, there are the same kinds of symptoms under 4.7-Stable)
My main question is to know where the problems are : is the hard
disk dead ? is the firewire/ATA
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 23:19:56 +0100, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hello,
I can't seem to use my new external firewire hard disk :
(this is with 5.0-DP2, there are the same kinds of symptoms under 4.7-Stable)
My main question is to know where the problems are : is the hard disk dead ?
is
John Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, John. The LaserJet 1200 advertises several alternate settings for the
printer-class interface: 7/1/3 (for IEEE 1284.4 packets, the new and
different USB interface you mentioned), 7/1/2 (bidirectional raw print
data), and 7/1/1 (unidirectional raw
Where can you get the FORTH bootnext replacement ?
- aW
You want the FORTH bootnext replacement that Jon Mini and James
Harris worked on.
This replaces the nextboot program, which was broken when FreeBSD
went to the FORTH bootloader during the a.out-ELF
According to the source code for ldconfig
(/usr/src/sbin/ldconfig/ldconfig.c),
ldconfig requires that the library file
have a name that:
* begins with 'lib'
* contains '.so.' (note the trailing period)
This is in the dodir() function, around line
270. It does not seem to require a number after
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Wilkinson,Alex wrote:
Where can you get the FORTH bootnext replacement ?
- aW
That is exactly what I asked Jon and he gave me the following reply
-rg
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:40:49 -0800
From: Jonathan Mini [EMAIL
Reinier Kleipool wrote:
but it does not put some files in the hints cache: (Files listed above
deleted by hand from the listing below)
root@mail:~# ls -l /usr/local/lib/*.so* | grep -v ^l
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 699643 Dec 1 11:12 /usr/local/lib/libdb-4.1.so*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel
Wilkinson,Alex wrote:
Where can you get the FORTH bootnext replacement ?
You want the FORTH bootnext replacement that Jon Mini and James
Harris worked on.
This replaces the nextboot program, which was broken when FreeBSD
went to the FORTH bootloader during
Rashim Gupta wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Wilkinson,Alex wrote:
Where can you get the FORTH bootnext replacement ?
That is exactly what I asked Jon and he gave me the following reply
You want nextboot, not bootnext, and it is in FreeBSD 5.
Cool. I didn't realized it had been
The attached patch allows me to print to my HP OfficeJet by making
ulpt0 use the bidirectional interface (7/1/2) instead of the IEEE1284
interface (7/1/3). I haven't had time to set up CUPS yet, but simply
catting a text file do /dev/ulpt0 works fine, while previously it
would just hang.
DES
--
Varshavchick Alexander wrote:
Can it be so that kernel maxusers=768 value being more than 512 leads to
spontaneous system freezes which can take up to several hours when the
system is just sleeping (only replying to ping) and doing nothing else,
not allowing to telnet or anything. The system
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Varshavchick Alexander wrote:
Can it be so that kernel maxusers=768 value being more than 512 leads to
spontaneous system freezes which can take up to several hours when the
system is just sleeping (only replying to ping) and doing nothing else,
Varshavchick Alexander wrote:
With these settings, and that much physical RAM, you should set
your KVA space to 3G (the default is 2G); have you?
Most likely, you are running out of KVA space for mappings.
No, I didn't do it, and I'm not sure how to perform it, can you please
advise?
With these settings, and that much physical RAM, you should set
your KVA space to 3G (the default is 2G); have you?
Most likely, you are running out of KVA space for mappings.
Every now and this I hear people saying (mostly you :)) that some problems
are KVA related or that the KVA must be
Marc Recht wrote:
Every now and this I hear people saying (mostly you :)) that some problems
are KVA related or that the KVA must be increased. This makes me a bit
curious, since I've never seen problems like that on Linux. It sounds for
me, the not kernel hacker, a bit like something which
I run netstat -i fxp0 while _innside_ a jail:
Name Mtu Network AddressIpkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs
fxp0 1500 10.10.10.10/ host 7908671 -39559 -
and then, I transfer a large file from the jail to some external host.
Name Mtu Network Address
Le Wednesday 04 December 2002 23:41, Julian Elischer a écrit :
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hello,
I can't seem to use my new external firewire hard disk : (this is
with 5.0-DP2, there are the same kinds of symptoms under 4.7-Stable)
My main question is to know where
35 matches
Mail list logo
