Ïðåäëîæåíèå

Ïðåäëîãàÿ Âàì èçãîòîâëåíèå ïëàñòèêîâûõ êàðò. Áûñòðî è íåäîðîãî. ò. 8-902-8868204 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

subscribe

Please subscribe me to the FreeBSD mailing list. thank you, Shane To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: having trouble understanding something about ccd

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rohit Grover writes: >Hello, > >This question is for the current maintainer(s) of ccd. The email >listed in ccd.c is invalid. > >In ccdioctl, for the command CCDIOCSET, ccdgetdisklabel() is called >after ccdinit(). In ccdgetdisklabel(), the raw partition's size is >i

having trouble understanding something about ccd

Hello, This question is for the current maintainer(s) of ccd. The email listed in ccd.c is invalid. In ccdioctl, for the command CCDIOCSET, ccdgetdisklabel() is called after ccdinit(). In ccdgetdisklabel(), the raw partition's size is initialized (to a value computed by ccdinit()) before calling

Re: Random disk cache expiry

The suggestion here basically boils down to this: if the system could act on hints that somebody will be doing sequential access, then it should be more timid about caching for that file access. That is to say, it should allow that file to "use up" a smaller number of blocks from the cache (y