Fragmentation Avoidance Code

2003-03-03 Thread Audsin
Respected Sir I am currently working in the fragmentation avoidance technique caused by the overhead introduced by MIP6. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and Kame Snap. I have introduced some code in netinet6/ip6_output.c code and netinet6/in6_pcb.h and netinet/in_pcb.h so that length of the MIP6 extensi

Fragmentation Avoidance Code

2003-03-03 Thread Audsin
Respected Sir I am currently working in the fragmentation avoidance technique caused by the overhead introduced by MIP6. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and Kame Snap. I have introduced some code in netinet6/ip6_output.c code and netinet6/in6_pcb.h and netinet/in_pcb.h so that length of the MIP6 extensi

Fragmentation Avoidance Code

2003-03-03 Thread Audsin
Respected Sir I am currently working in the fragmentation avoidance technique caused by the overhead introduced by MIP6. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and Kame Snap. I have introduced some code in netinet6/ip6_output.c code and netinet6/in6_pcb.h and netinet/in_pcb.h so that length of the MIP6 extensi

¦³¾÷·|§AÄ@·N¥h¹Á¸Õ¶Ü??

2003-03-03 Thread star
Title: ¬°¤°»ò¦³¤H·|¤ñ§A¦¨¥\10­¿ ¥D¦®: ³o©Î³\¬O±z¥¿¦b´M§äªº¾÷·|³á ³o©Î³\¬O±z¥¿¦b§äªº¾÷·|[EMAIL PROTECTED] ¹ï¤£°_¡I¥´ÂZ¤F¡A¦pªG¦]¦¹³y¦¨±zªº§xÂZ¡A½Ðª½±µ§R°£¥»«H¤ÎÂI¿ï¤U¤è¡u¤£·Q¦A¦¬«H¡v¡A§Ú­Ì·|±N±zªº¸ê®Æ§R°£¡I

¦³¾÷·|§AÄ@·N¥h¹Á¸Õ¶Ü??

2003-03-03 Thread star
Title: ¬°¤°»ò¦³¤H·|¤ñ§A¦¨¥\10­¿ ¥D¦®: ³o©Î³\¬O±z¥¿¦b´M§äªº¾÷·|³á ³o©Î³\¬O±z¥¿¦b§äªº¾÷·|[EMAIL PROTECTED] ¹ï¤£°_¡I¥´ÂZ¤F¡A¦pªG¦]¦¹³y¦¨±zªº§xÂZ¡A½Ðª½±µ§R°£¥»«H¤ÎÂI¿ï¤U¤è¡u¤£·Q¦A¦¬«H¡v¡A§Ú­Ì·|±N±zªº¸ê®Æ§R°£¡I

lpc problem with LinkSys print servers

2003-03-03 Thread Peter Elsner
Greetings hackers... I have an interesting little problem. I have about 13 customers that are running FreeBSD 4.5 to 4.7 (STABLE), with 3-port LinkSys print servers. Everything seems to be working fine. For the past 3 months one of these customers was reporting printing problems on one of th

Re: Fragmentation Avoidance Code

2003-03-03 Thread Terry Lambert
Audsin wrote: > I am currently working in the fragmentation avoidance technique caused by > the overhead introduced by MIP6. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and Kame Snap. > I have introduced some code in netinet6/ip6_output.c code and > netinet6/in6_pcb.h and netinet/in_pcb.h so that length of the MIP6 > e

jail statfs patch

2003-03-03 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
Hi, attached is a patch for 5.0/HEAD that adds a fine grained option to control what fs stats can be seen from within jails. I know that there is also a kernel module available but as I already had started to work on this I finished it for those people who preferr it this way. --- description --

Re: jail statfs patch

2003-03-03 Thread Christian Kratzer
Moin, On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Hi, > > attached is a patch for 5.0/HEAD that adds a fine grained option to > control what fs stats can be seen from within jails. > > I know that there is also a kernel module available but as I already > had started to work on this I finished it

future of all the jail patches [was: Re: jail statfs patch]

2003-03-03 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Christian Kratzer wrote: Hi, > > attached is a patch for 5.0/HEAD that adds a fine grained option to > > control what fs stats can be seen from within jails. > > > > I know that there is also a kernel module available but as I already > > had started to work on this I finished

RE: Jail seperation patch

2003-03-03 Thread Mooneer Salem
Hello, My test settings are as follows: Host system (pacific.lifeafterking.org): 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 Jail (test.lifeafterking.org): 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 I also made a new patch which fixes these issues: 1. Telnetting to 0.0.0.0 in the jail now redirects to the first jail IP. 2. Non-root

Mailman results for mysql-br

2003-03-03 Thread mysql-br-request
This is an automated response. There were problems with the email commands you sent to Mailman via the administrative address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To obtain instructions on valid Mailman email commands, send email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the word "help" in the subject line or in the body of t

review request: making fdisk support hog slices

2003-03-03 Thread Brooks Davis
I've made some trivial changes to fdisk's config file parsing code to allow the user to specify -1 as the length of a slice to force it to run to the end of the disk. This allows you to create a set of fixed sized slices and then one that fills the disk without having to worry about the actual siz

Re: review request: making fdisk support hog slices

2003-03-03 Thread Julian Elischer
How about using the same scheme that disklabel uses.. a "*" means 'rest of device'. On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Brooks Davis wrote: > I've made some trivial changes to fdisk's config file parsing code to > allow the user to specify -1 as the length of a slice to force it to run > to the end of the disk.

'ticks' in kernel.

2003-03-03 Thread Jan Knepper
Any one have an idea how to pull the value for 'ticks' (kern_clock.c) from the kernel? I have looked into sysctl, but could not find "how to". I am overlooking something? Thanks! Jan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: 'ticks' in kernel.

2003-03-03 Thread Kan Cai
Probably you could try this: " asm volatile(".byte 0x0f, 0x31" : "=A" (tstart)); asm volatile(".byte 0x0f, 0x31" : "=A" (tend)); " it should be right for X86 platform. --Ken On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Jan Knepper wrote: > Any one have an idea how to pull the value for 'ticks' (kern_clock.c) > from