Hey doods,
I've been into the warez scene for more than 4 months, and I am totally 1337. I want
to join your group. I've exchanged some warez stuff with a guy called Pull-Henneeng
Kunt, who told me to come here. I'm now looking for a valid vmware key, and can swap
it for some hot warez.
P.S.
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : static struct cdevsw sio_cdevsw = {
: : +#if __FreeBSD_version = 500104 /* = 20030303 */
:
: This syntax works even for old versions of FreeBSD. You can make it
: safe by
At 13:29 5/03/2003, Joseph Contreras wrote:
Hey doods,
I've been into the warez scene for more than 4 months, and I am totally
1337. I want to join your group. I've exchanged some warez stuff with a
guy called Pull-Henneeng Kunt, who told me to come here. I'm now looking
for a valid vmware
Sometimes one should just avoid the temptation
to do something no matter how much one feels the
other person seems to deserve it. Overall the do
not answer things or start flames seems to be
a good thing. Almost everytime I went flame on
I regreted it. This is especially important in technical
FJ33R
In warez we trust? Anyway, I agree with Steve Kudlak.
However tempted I am to feed the tamagotchi, I MUST RESIST.
Ciao,
-JediHobbes-
P.S. I congratulate you on becoming 1337 Joseph, now
maybe one day you can hope to become 54N3
==
Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Bram Van Dam wrote:
Boy you're the lamer aren't you.. How old are ya? 10?
Request permission to flame this, err, person .. :P
Permission denied. Don't feed the trolls. :)
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike,
I don't have the test, but I've built a generic performance
testing framework for FreeBSD over the past couple of months
that would make running such a test trivial. I'd post a link
but the page has no permanent home yet. When it gets one I can
follow it up with a link.
I'd be happy
It's very WIP right now and will remain so for another couple
of weeks. I'd planned to show more people a 'working' version
when a) i got a home for the page and b) the numbers its
producing have reasonable variance.
I'd prefer defering a public release until those goals are
reached. You've
ÚÄÄÄ¿
³ ³
³ N) . NNN _NL. ³
³ (NN. (NN NNN) (N) ³
³ (NN) `NN. (NNN) JNNNF4NN. ³
³ (NN)NNN JNNN `NNL ³
³ (NN) (NNN) .(NNN _. 4) ³
³
ÚÄÄÄ¿
³ ³
³ N) . NNN _NL. ³
³ (NN. (NN NNN) (N) ³
³ (NN) `NN. (NNN) JNNNF4NN. ³
³ (NN)NNN JNNN `NNL ³
³ (NN) (NNN) .(NNN _. 4) ³
³
Hi,
I have a trunk configured on a Baystack. I am using ng_fec, downloaded from
Bill's directory last night.
When I configure two fxp ports with the example load script, I'm getting a
message fxp0 up and fxp1 up, but fec0 doesn't work. I have assigned an ip
address and try to ping outside,
OpenSSH uses openssl to a great extent, however when you do
ldd ssh
you get:
libssh.so.2 = /usr/lib/libssh.so.2 (0x28078000)
libcrypto.so.2 = /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.2 (0x280a9000)
libutil.so.3 = /usr/lib/libutil.so.3 (0x28161000)
libz.so.2 = /usr/lib/libz.so.2
to answer myself a bit..
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
OpenSSH uses openssl to a great extent, however when you do
ldd ssh
you get:
libssh.so.2 = /usr/lib/libssh.so.2 (0x28078000)
libcrypto.so.2 = /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.2 (0x280a9000)
libutil.so.3
Well, I guess since I have not heard any brilliant solutions.
Could/should I add a query for 'ticks' to sysctl?
Thanks!
Jan
Jan Knepper wrote:
David Malone wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:00:02PM -0500, Jan Knepper wrote:
How would they return me the 'value' of 'ticks'?
The problem
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 01:55:14PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
OpenSSH uses openssl to a great extent, however when you do
[ ... ]
so my question is:
how is the connection made to libssl?
is it via libcrypto?
is it statically built into the ssh binary?
OpenSSH doesn't actually use
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
You are wrong, but it's not your fault :-) OpenSSH specifically
checks the version of OpenSSL which it finds at runtime, and if it
does not match the version it found at build-time, then it barfs
with
OpenSSL version
I'm not sure if this topic has ever been covered before or not. I couldn't
find it in the list archives, but then I wasn't exactly sure how to search
for it.
Has anyone ever considered embedding some sort of identifier in kernel
modules to keep them from being loaded with the wrong kernel?
Back
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sean Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Has anyone ever considered embedding some sort of identifier in kernel
: modules to keep them from being loaded with the wrong kernel?
Actually, I was talking about this with Matt Dodd this morning...
Warner
To
Here's a simple patch. However, it is a total suck-ass kludge (and
that's being generous). The ABI isn't THE ABI, but rather a
collection of ABIs. These ABIs change slowly and there is a certain
range that work together. Historically, we've been really bad about
bumping version numbers when
At 2003-03-06T03:08:52Z, Sean Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone ever considered embedding some sort of identifier in kernel
modules to keep them from being loaded with the wrong kernel?
Unless I'm mistaken, 5.0 supports having multiple kernels installed, each
with their own modules
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 10:17:16AM -0800, Wes Peters wrote:
I completely utterly fail to understand why some young developers attach
some sort of romance to writing code on an 80x25 screen, when all the
haxxors my age or older waited (or slaved away) for years, even
decades, to get
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:33:31PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-03-06T03:08:52Z, Sean Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone ever considered embedding some sort of identifier in kernel
modules to keep them from being loaded with the wrong kernel?
Unless I'm mistaken, 5.0 supports
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:59:01PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Here's a simple patch. However, it is a total suck-ass kludge (and
that's being generous). The ABI isn't THE ABI, but rather a
collection of ABIs. These ABIs change slowly and there is a certain
range that work together.
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:59:01PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Here's a simple patch. However, it is a total suck-ass kludge (and
that's being generous). The ABI isn't THE ABI, but rather a
collection of ABIs. These ABIs change slowly and there is a certain
range that work together.
I think
Hi all,
A FreeBSD 4.7 machine with an AMI Megaraid controller and 3 disks in a
RAID 5 array failed on me this week.
One of the disk drives went into offline state due to overheating and
the array, to the best of my knowledge should have continued in degraded
mode.
Two things concern me at this
25 matches
Mail list logo
