Re: first parameter to select

2003-03-12 Thread David Cuthbert
Sean Hamilton wrote: > What is the first parameter to select(2) for? Microsoft's select ignores it, > and it does not appear to have any valid use since it only allows > constraints on values which are assigned by the system. > > Purely historic? Ah, you've been reading the Winsock documentation

Re: first parameter to select

2003-03-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 12), Sean Hamilton said: > What is the first parameter to select(2) for? Microsoft's select > ignores it, and it does not appear to have any valid use since it > only allows constraints on values which are assigned by the system. I'd hate to have the kernel scan a 6000-ele

Re: Realtek

2003-03-12 Thread soralx
>| are you sure it's not because of this: >| 'ping: sendto: No buffer space available'? >No such messages appeared. I forgot that I hooked it up to 10Mbit hub for now, so nevermind 8) are you piping it through 'less'? you won't see this message in 'less' output what's the value of your 'kern.ipc

Re: Realtek

2003-03-12 Thread Doug Ambrisko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] | > 5000 packets transmitted, 94 packets received, 98% packet loss | > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.156/0.337/0.605/0.159 ms | > So I'm not see much difference. | | are you sure it's not because of this: | 'ping:

first parameter to select

2003-03-12 Thread Sean Hamilton
Greetings, What is the first parameter to select(2) for? Microsoft's select ignores it, and it does not appear to have any valid use since it only allows constraints on values which are assigned by the system. Purely historic? sh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Kernel trace

2003-03-12 Thread Yaoping Ruan
Does any one know the implementation of "ktrace" in FreeBSD? I would like to hack the source code and have a relatively easy way to copy the kernel stack image when a certain of thing happens, such as page fault. It should work like the breakpoints in gdb. But kernel panic is too much trouble for j

Re: Realtek

2003-03-12 Thread soralx
> 5000 packets transmitted, 94 packets received, 98% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.156/0.337/0.605/0.159 ms > So I'm not see much difference. are you sure it's not because of this: 'ping: sendto: No buffer space available'? 12.03.2003; 18:56:02 [SorAlx] http://cydem.org.ua/

magic symbolic links (ideas/patches?)

2003-03-12 Thread John
Hi Folks, I have a need to implement a highly specific variant usage of what are commonly referred to as magic symlinks, ie: /src -> /.src/$ARCH/src where $ARCH needs to come from the user environment. A related patchset from NetBSD (1995) can be seen here: http://www.netbsd.org/cg

Re: redirect everything to socks5

2003-03-12 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Keith Pitcher writes: | Living in rural slow connection land, I've been playing around with | satellite Internet. The problem is the company only has Win | drivers. (Linux driver is in the works, but no plans to open source it, will be | released as a binary - the bastards) | | Anyhow, to get the

usb not working on intel motherboard

2003-03-12 Thread JacobRhoden
Hi, It seems that no matter what I do I can not get usb devices to even be recognised. (Yes usbd is running). Relevant DMESG and usbd error messages below. Does anyone have any ideas? (I have tried usb mouse, keyboard, and camera). Thanks, Jacob FreeBSD elkanah.its.unimelb.edu.au 4.8-RC Free

Re: Are there any on-going projects on v4l porting?

2003-03-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 12), Yury Tarasievich said: > At http://freebsddvb.narod.ru, there exists an adequately up-to-date > port of linux DVB drivers, seemingly supporting DVB adapters up to > rev.1.5. > > Regarding porting of V4L. I may be utterly wrong, but isn't the whole > V4L/V4L2/V4L2-what

Re: Are there any on-going projects on v4l porting?

2003-03-12 Thread Yury Tarasievich
At http://freebsddvb.narod.ru, there exists an adequately up-to-date port of linux DVB drivers, seemingly supporting DVB adapters up to rev.1.5. Regarding porting of V4L. I may be utterly wrong, but isn't the whole V4L/V4L2/V4L2-whatever thing rather made ad hoc, not really designed? Could some

Re: Realtek

2003-03-12 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Wes Peters writes: | Or you can cheat and use a SmartBits-2000 like I did. It can send exactly | 148,800 packets per second, with very precise timing of the inter-packet Soon we should be getting an Ixia. | So it seems to keep up reasonably well, but this is misleading. Use -l to | force the

FreeBSD-specific CVS: tagexpand question

2003-03-12 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
Colleagues, I'm not sure this is the most correct place to ask, but it at least seems so. Is there any way to tune FreeBSD-specific CVS (with CVSROOT/options support) to provide the following functionality: - ident keyword should be standard ($ Id $) - it should be expanded as ($ CVSHeader $) to

Re: Realtek

2003-03-12 Thread Wes Peters
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 00:37, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > ... > > > Are you sure you were generating "wire speed" packets - this is about > > 200,000 packets/sec at Fast speed. "ping -f" runs at whatever rate > > 148,800kpps > > > In ord

pointers on how to debug a pppoe quirk

2003-03-12 Thread The Anarcat
I recently started having big problems with my ADSL/pppoe connection. When ppp gets tired of not having any LQR feedback, it disconnects: ppp[3839]: tun0: Phase: deflink: ** Too many LQR packets lost ** and the kernel spews out: /kernel: session in wrong state ...just after ppp prints out: ppp

pthread keys and resource leaks

2003-03-12 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
Hi All, Please show me how stupid I am :-) There does not appear to be a way to avoid resource leaks in a library that must manage thread-local storage. The problem appears to be that the destructor given to pthread_key_create is not called for the `main thread' (uncertain terminology). Example

Re: IP addresses of bridge interfaces

2003-03-12 Thread David Malone
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:17:25PM -0800, Sean Hamilton wrote: > I recently upgraded a FreeBSD 4.6.2 bridge to 5.0, and am having troubles > with how it handles IP addresses. This problem is due to a rather contraversial change, where packets are only accepted to addressed to the interface they ar

Re: IP addresses of bridge interfaces

2003-03-12 Thread Soeren Straarup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I had the same problem. My solution was to add 'gateway_enable="YES"' to my /etc/rc.conf I don't know if that is the right way.. but it works. I also had trouble getting the ip address set at boot time and had to make a script that did that. I wo

Re: Realtek

2003-03-12 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: ... > Are you sure you were generating "wire speed" packets - this is about > 200,000 packets/sec at Fast speed. "ping -f" runs at whatever rate 148,800kpps > In order to get 200,000 pps, you're going to need 5-10 hosts > generating t