Re: vlan/bridging broken in 4.8-release?

2003-05-27 Thread Marco Wertejuk
Hello Maxim, today I've tried your hack and it works, at least it seems so. It was not exactly the same setup but nearly the same. The bridge has two interfaces (fxp0, fxp1) and one host is connected to each interface (using crosslink cables, no other networking devices such as broken HP ProCurve

Rrrrrr.....

2003-05-27 Thread Bill Paul
Ok, I've gotten enough e-mail about this now that it's starting to be annoying, so I'm going to nip this in the bud right now. People have started asking me about the Broadcom 4400 series chips. They have noticed that there's this "if_bge" driver with the word "Broadcom" associated with it, and se

Re: [PATCH] changing the ToS in IP Header

2003-05-27 Thread Ashish Kulkarni
> > The attached patch adds a new sysctl oid for support of a > "net.inet.ip.default_tos" (default: 0). > > I sent it as a context diff, in case the kernel has changed > more than a little since the last time I updated. > > Note: I only compile-tested this. > Thanks a lot for the help, and especi

rc.diskless1/initdiskless change for review

2003-05-27 Thread Brooks Davis
The following patch (against rc.diskless1 on STABLE, but the code is identical in rc.d/initdiskless) simplifies the likely common case for remounts in the /conf hierarchy. It allows you to specify a path (i.e. /etc) in the diskless_remount file rather then having to record the path to the NFS root

Re: changing the ToS in IP Header

2003-05-27 Thread Ashish Kulkarni
Kenjiro Cho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tell your ISP not to use 0x02; it violates the standard. > You may modify the upper 6 bits for an arbitrary value, though. Well, my cable ISP provides a 3rd party Windows-only client that enables forwarding of packets only when logged in. I've reverse engi

doing things around rc.d/diskless

2003-05-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On some diskless 4.x systems, I've got the following patch in place to let me do things before and after rc.diskless2 does it's stuff: Index: rc.diskless2 === RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/etc/Attic/rc.diskless2,v retrieving revision 1.5.2.1

RE: Rrrrrr.....

2003-05-27 Thread Duncan Barclay
Dear Bill, On 27-May-2003 Bill Paul wrote: > Ok, I've gotten enough e-mail about this now that it's starting to be > annoying, so I'm going to nip this in the bud right now. If this was prompted by my private email earlier today then I am sorry to have been the straw that broke your back. Having

Hey, man

2003-05-27 Thread Nikolai Krylenko
What's up? I hear you use Debian! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

gcc problem/openoffice failure

2003-05-27 Thread Julian Elischer
For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile the openoffice port due to gcc failures. (I have posted the message earlier several times) Has anyone been able to compile the openoffice port recently? somewher

Re: Hey, man

2003-05-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:58:29PM +, Nikolai Krylenko wrote: > What's up? I hear you use Debian! WORST TROLL EVER! Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure

2003-05-27 Thread Bruce R. Montague
Julian Elischer wrote: > ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ... > ... Has anyone else seen this? I tried to build openoffice on a "clean" -current system, built from a recent cvsup, and it failed to compile... This was perhaps a week and a half ago, kept meaning to ge

Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure

2003-05-27 Thread Don Lewis
On 27 May, Julian Elischer wrote: > > For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my > system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile > the openoffice port due to gcc failures. > (I have posted the message earlier several times) > Has anyone been able to c

Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure

2003-05-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Bruce R. Montague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : Julian Elischer wrote: : : > ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ... : : > ... Has anyone else seen this? : : : I tried to build openoffice on a "clean" -current system, : b

Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure

2003-05-27 Thread Julian Elischer
On Tue, 27 May 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Bruce R. Montague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > : Julian Elischer wrote: > : > : > ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ... > : > : > ... Has anyone else seen this? > : > :

Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure

2003-05-27 Thread Don Lewis
On 27 May, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Bruce R. Montague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > : Julian Elischer wrote: > : > : > ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ... > : > : > ... Has anyone else seen this? > : > : > : I trie

Re: [PATCH] changing the ToS in IP Header

2003-05-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Ashish Kulkarni wrote: > > The attached patch adds a new sysctl oid for support of a > > "net.inet.ip.default_tos" (default: 0). > > > > I sent it as a context diff, in case the kernel has changed > > more than a little since the last time I updated. > > > > Note: I only compile-tested this. > > T

Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8

2003-05-27 Thread Wes Peters
On Thursday 22 May 2003 10:23 am, Julian Elischer wrote: > I have rebuilt my system several times and rebuilt all ports.. > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice always ends up with: GCC 3.2 is broken by design. It insists, amongst other stupidities, on type-checking arguments using old style declaratio