Hello Maxim,
today I've tried your hack and it works, at least it seems so.
It was not exactly the same setup but nearly the same.
The bridge has two interfaces (fxp0, fxp1) and
one host is connected to each interface (using crosslink
cables, no other networking devices such as broken HP
ProCurve
Ok, I've gotten enough e-mail about this now that it's starting to be
annoying, so I'm going to nip this in the bud right now.
People have started asking me about the Broadcom 4400 series chips.
They have noticed that there's this "if_bge" driver with the word
"Broadcom" associated with it, and se
>
> The attached patch adds a new sysctl oid for support of a
> "net.inet.ip.default_tos" (default: 0).
>
> I sent it as a context diff, in case the kernel has changed
> more than a little since the last time I updated.
>
> Note: I only compile-tested this.
>
Thanks a lot for the help, and especi
The following patch (against rc.diskless1 on STABLE, but the code is
identical in rc.d/initdiskless) simplifies the likely common case for
remounts in the /conf hierarchy. It allows you to specify a path (i.e.
/etc) in the diskless_remount file rather then having to record the path
to the NFS root
Kenjiro Cho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tell your ISP not to use 0x02; it violates the standard.
> You may modify the upper 6 bits for an arbitrary value, though.
Well, my cable ISP provides a 3rd party Windows-only client that enables
forwarding of packets only when logged in. I've reverse engi
On some diskless 4.x systems, I've got the following patch in place to
let me do things before and after rc.diskless2 does it's stuff:
Index: rc.diskless2
===
RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/etc/Attic/rc.diskless2,v
retrieving revision 1.5.2.1
Dear Bill,
On 27-May-2003 Bill Paul wrote:
> Ok, I've gotten enough e-mail about this now that it's starting to be
> annoying, so I'm going to nip this in the bud right now.
If this was prompted by my private email earlier today then I am sorry
to have been the straw that broke your back. Having
What's up? I hear you use Debian!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my
system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile
the openoffice port due to gcc failures.
(I have posted the message earlier several times)
Has anyone been able to compile the openoffice port recently?
somewher
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:58:29PM +, Nikolai Krylenko wrote:
> What's up? I hear you use Debian!
WORST TROLL EVER!
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Julian Elischer wrote:
> ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ...
> ... Has anyone else seen this?
I tried to build openoffice on a "clean" -current system,
built from a recent cvsup, and it failed to compile... This
was perhaps a week and a half ago, kept meaning to ge
On 27 May, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my
> system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile
> the openoffice port due to gcc failures.
> (I have posted the message earlier several times)
> Has anyone been able to c
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Bruce R. Montague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Julian Elischer wrote:
:
: > ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ...
:
: > ... Has anyone else seen this?
:
:
: I tried to build openoffice on a "clean" -current system,
: b
On Tue, 27 May 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Bruce R. Montague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :
> : Julian Elischer wrote:
> :
> : > ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ...
> :
> : > ... Has anyone else seen this?
> :
> :
On 27 May, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Bruce R. Montague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :
> : Julian Elischer wrote:
> :
> : > ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ...
> :
> : > ... Has anyone else seen this?
> :
> :
> : I trie
Ashish Kulkarni wrote:
> > The attached patch adds a new sysctl oid for support of a
> > "net.inet.ip.default_tos" (default: 0).
> >
> > I sent it as a context diff, in case the kernel has changed
> > more than a little since the last time I updated.
> >
> > Note: I only compile-tested this.
>
> T
On Thursday 22 May 2003 10:23 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I have rebuilt my system several times and rebuilt all ports..
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice always ends up with:
GCC 3.2 is broken by design. It insists, amongst other stupidities, on
type-checking arguments using old style declaratio
17 matches
Mail list logo