Julian Elischer wrote [2003-05-27]:
>
> For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my
> system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile
> the openoffice port due to gcc failures.
> (I have posted the message earlier several times)
> Has anyone been able to
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:55:47PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>Has anyone been able to compile the openoffice port recently?
It built successfully for me on 25th April in -STABLE.
Are you using any non-default flags or options? Last time I tried to
build it with debugging enabled (beginning o
Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GCC 3.2 is broken by design. It insists, amongst other stupidities, on
> type-checking arguments using old style declarations like:
>
> int foo(bar)
> char *bar;
> {}
>
> rendering most UNIX software from before 1996 uncompilable.
have y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-05-28 at 14:12:34 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> have you tried -traditional?
gcc 3.1 release notes:
The -traditional C compiler option has been deprecated and will be
removed in GCC 3.3. (It remains possible to preprocess non-C code
with
4 matches
Mail list logo
