Hi.. thanks for your response.. it did exactly what I needed. I tried
some of the other solutions provided earlier in the day and ended up
locking up a machine 340 miles away from here which is a good 6-7 hour
drive from where I am currently.
Thanks again,
Ryan Wilkins
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 14:
* Pawel Jakub Dawidek:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:20:26PM +0200, clemens fischer wrote:
> +> > We are proudly announce that CerbNG-1.0 Release Candidate 2 is now
> +> > avaliable.
> +>
> +> congratulations! may i suggest to always include the CVS tag of any
> +> release announced here? i just
The filers here are all debugged through terminal servers using
gdb on the client and a gdb stub on the server. So if it doesn't
work it is likely due to your setup or a bug in FreeBSD's gdb stub.
-Kip
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Does anyone kno
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:20:26PM +0200, clemens fischer wrote:
+> > We are proudly announce that CerbNG-1.0 Release Candidate 2 is now
+> > avaliable.
+>
+> congratulations! may i suggest to always include the CVS tag of any
+> release announced here? i just tried to make(1) the CVS HEAD on my
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:55:53AM -0400, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
> Hello..
>
> I'm setting up a TCP protocol testbed for testing various enhanced TCP
> stacks for use over high bandwidth, high latency links such as
> Satellite. Due to hardware limitations of the FreeBSD boxes we're using
> (1U rackm
Thanks for the clarificaton.
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:31:13PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Shouldn't sed be part of the build tools?
No. build-tools are a different beastie; they are the tools
that are only built during buildworld to "build" something
else. sed(1) isn
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:31:13PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Shouldn't sed be part of the build tools?
>
No. build-tools are a different beastie; they are the tools
that are only built during buildworld to "build" something
else. sed(1) isn't such a tool. Yes, it can be put under
the boo
Does anyone know if it's possiable to run remote GDB through a terminal
server? Connections to the terminal server are via SSH to portslave.
I've got some boxes I upgraded fom 4.6-STABLE to 4.8-STABLE which now
reliably crash under heavy FS load that I'm trying to debug and my
easiest acess is via
Shouldn't sed be part of the build tools?
It's used in src//gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/Makefile, at the very least:
targmatch.h: targmatch.sed config.bfd
sed -f ${.ALLSRC:M*.sed} ${.ALLSRC:M*.bfd} > ${.TARGET}
config.h: config.h.fbsd
.if ${TARGET_ARCH} == "i386"
sed -e 's,!!TRAD_
* Pawel Jakub Dawidek:
> We are proudly announce that CerbNG-1.0 Release Candidate 2 is now
> avaliable.
congratulations! may i suggest to always include the CVS tag of any
release announced here? i just tried to make(1) the CVS HEAD on my
freebsd-4.8, but this failed the compilation.
clemen
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Nat Lanza wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 06:22, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Someone should port the network debugging from Darwin using
> > the tiny IP stack from NetBSD.
>
> Well, there's this:
>
> http://ipgdb.sourceforge.net/
>
> > IPGDB is a collection of extensions to GDB
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 06:22, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Someone should port the network debugging from Darwin using
> the tiny IP stack from NetBSD.
Well, there's this:
http://ipgdb.sourceforge.net/
> IPGDB is a collection of extensions to GDB and FreeBSD-4.3
> to allow two-machine kernel debugging
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Vlad GALU wrote:
> > Satellite. Due to hardware limitations of the FreeBSD boxes we're
> > using(1U rackmount), there are no expansion slots left for additional
There are several 4, 6 and 8 port ethernet cards on the marked - which
only take up one slot. I've also solved t
On 11 Jun 2003 08:55:53 -0400
Ryan Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello..
>
> I'm setting up a TCP protocol testbed for testing various enhanced TCP
> stacks for use over high bandwidth, high latency links such as
> Satellite. Due to hardware limitations of the FreeBSD boxes we're
> using(
Hello..
I'm setting up a TCP protocol testbed for testing various enhanced TCP
stacks for use over high bandwidth, high latency links such as
Satellite. Due to hardware limitations of the FreeBSD boxes we're using
(1U rackmount), there are no expansion slots left for additional network
cards. Th
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Serial GDB is very nice.. You can even do firewire debugging, but I guess you
> guys can't really use that :)
> (Firewire mini-PCI board? 8-)
Someone should port the network debugging from Darwin using
the tiny IP stack from NetBSD.
-- Terry
__
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:22, Soren Kristensen wrote:
> Lesson learned:
>
> Advanced FreeBSD documentation sucks if you're not a kernel hacker, but
> remote kernel debugging works great and are actually kinda fun
Procedural things are more likely to be usefully documented in the handbook or
FAQ
Hi Everybody,
First, thanks to everybody offering tips and help. The good news is that
the problem is solved.
I couldn't wait, so I finally decided to learn a little FreeBSD kernel
debugging. After reading lots of not very comprehensive man pages and
other guides, I got a 4.4 kernel compiled w
18 matches
Mail list logo
