Thank you for participating in the AFA Solo Ad Contest. Your submission has been
received and entered into the drawing. We will notify the 3 winners at the end of the
month so watch your mail.
Remember, you too can have your own ad campaign for the best prices around. Just
contact your ezine pu
Should have poked at this a bit more before posting, sorry. I was
experimenting with having NO_BIND in make.conf, along with deleting all
the includes that are part of BIND. That combination is what caused the
failure.
To add insult to injury, the early colldef build is looking for
in /usr/includ
On 2003.07.02 14:45:49 -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> On Monday 30 June 2003 14:39, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > There was a bogus non-reentrant version half-implemented in libc in
> > both 4.x and 5.x, which I recently removed in 5.x. I need to remove
> > it on 4.x as well. General consensus seems t
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> On Monday 30 June 2003 14:39, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:43:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation of a
> > > reentrant gethostbyname_r fun
On Monday 30 June 2003 14:39, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:43:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation of a
> > reentrant gethostbyname_r function, mostly because it looks like
> > mozilla/firebird will finally ga
On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 12:24 PM, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
Justin,
Yes, after reading your post, I found this:
--
Structure Assignments
ANSI C compilers allow the information in one structure to be assigned
to
another structure, as in:
binfo=addr_info;
--
I never knew that.
Another d
Hi,
Les Biffle wrote on Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:34:02PM -0700:
> > Oh, My dongle is on -current.
>
> Is that 3-Current? I'm ready to cvsup to it, if it feels solid to you.
> We've a production product that has been rock-solid on 3.5-stable, and
> I don't want to join the ranks of the flaky produ
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:34:02PM -0700, Les Biffle wrote:
> > Oh, My dongle is on -current.
>
> Is that 3-Current? I'm ready to cvsup to it, if it feels solid to you.
> We've a production product that has been rock-solid on 3.5-stable, and
> I don't want to join the ranks of the flaky product p
> Oh, My dongle is on -current.
Is that 3-Current? I'm ready to cvsup to it, if it feels solid to you.
We've a production product that has been rock-solid on 3.5-stable, and
I don't want to join the ranks of the flaky product providers just to
get USB serial support.
-Les
--
Les Biffle
CISSP
Justin,
Yes, after reading your post, I found this:
--
Structure Assignments
ANSI C compilers allow the information in one structure to be assigned to
another structure, as in:
binfo=addr_info;
--
I never knew that. I wonder why that functionality is done for structs,
but not extended to
I think you're missing something.
This is "structure assignment" in action. The variable 'sbp' is a
*statb, and the assignment assigns a structure, sb2, to *sbp, which is
itself a structure, not a pointer.
Regards,
Justin
On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 10:54 AM, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
Greet
Greetings,
I was looking over the code for the tail command and found something that
seems wrong. Below is the abbreviated code that highlights my concern.
Basically, sb is defined in main() and passed to forward() (and reverse())
by reference. Then in forward() sb2 is defined, and finally sb i
Sandeep Kumar Davu wrote:
> I am scanning throug the freeBSD source code and wanted to know somethin about
> the bind system call. I could follow through the code till sobind and after
> that pru_bind routine is called in uipc_socket.c. Then suddenly in
> tcp_usrreq.c there is tcp_usr_bind. I am wo
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 23:36, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Les Biffle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I need two serial ports on a modern server running our 3.5-based firewall
> : code, but the 1U servers I find have only one serial port. I need one
> : for
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:50:28PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
> yeah, but i have posted the problem again because the problem remains.
> I have tried you tips, but without success.
> In google, i did not found nothing about this (just my own message, and your
> response)... or
Dear MSN Newsletter customer,
You have received this mail because you have replied to an unmonitored alias.
For assistance with your newsletter subscription, please select one of the following
options:
Manage (subscribe or unsubscribe)your newsletter subscriptions via our website.
http://news
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Does anyone know of any multiport seiral adaptors that work
> with FreeBSD
> 4.x or 5.x ?
Not multiport, but cheap enough to buy 2 of them:
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), Intel(0x), rev
1.00
port 2 a
for the record:
I can now confirm that select/poll/FIONREAD do work with the
usb/ucom/uplcom!
what seems to be broken is the call to 'tcflush(fd, TCIFLUSH)'
this works fine with /dev/cuaa0 but not with /dev/ucom0
thanks all,
danny
__
18 matches
Mail list logo
