On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
> >
> > I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
> > give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
>
> Well, all I did was test
Hi,
I'm currently developing a driver for this watchdog-card:
'Antrax WatchCard PCI' -> http://www.antrax.de/ (German)
(btw. Antrax != Anthrax)
And now I have some questions:
- Should I develop the driver for 4.x or 5.x or both?
- What would be the preferred method for configuring and handling
Josh Brooks wrote this message on Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00 -0700:
> 2. what is the current "best practices" strategy for mounting up a devfs
> in a jail ?
man 8 devfs
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
>
> I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
> give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
Well, all I did was test your research :-)
>
> One strategy I saw was:
>
> mo
At Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:29:51 +0300,
Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> for the record:
> I can now confirm that select/poll/FIONREAD do work with the
> usb/ucom/uplcom!
>
> what seems to be broken is the call to 'tcflush(fd, TCIFLUSH)'
> this works fine with /dev/cuaa0 but not with /dev/ucom0
Humm..
I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
One strategy I saw was:
mount -t devfs devfs /home/jail/dev
( cd /home/jail/dev ; rm $devices_i_dont_want_in_my_jails )
mount -u -o nonewdev /home/jail/dev
Ho
6 matches
Mail list logo