Re: GEOM Gate.

2003-08-16 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 08:50:30PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: +> What kind of hardware were you using? 2.5MB/sec NFS sounds abysmal. I don't think it is a hardware problem. Run this test on 5.1-CURRENT with: options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT options WITNESS an

Re: GEOM Gate.

2003-08-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Aug 17), Pawel Jakub Dawidek said: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 11:53:11AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > +> That said, I think the geom gate stuff looks very cool :-). You > +> might be able to run some interesting performance numbers > +> comparing NFS and UFS over a remote bloc

Re: GEOM Gate.

2003-08-16 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 11:53:11AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: +> That said, I think the geom gate stuff looks very cool :-). You might be +> able to run some interesting performance numbers comparing NFS and UFS +> over a remote block device. Ok. After last geom gate optimizations I'm ready to s

Re: nVIDIA nForece2, again

2003-08-16 Thread Jin Guojun [NCS]
It is a vague problem on term of best performance -- what. NVidia has better memory bandwidth in AMD motherboards. However, if SATA is involved, some motherboard either lowed the memory bandwidth, or had other I/O issues. In terms of IDE performance, the AMD 760MP has the best performance in all

Re: Debugging symbols with nasm

2003-08-16 Thread qhwt
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 07:32:52AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello. > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 09:14:30AM +0300, Vladimir Ciobanu wrote: > > I'm not sure whether this is the best list to post to, but it's my > > first guess. I'm using nasm to compile some code I wrote. The > > develop

Re: Debugging symbols with nasm

2003-08-16 Thread qhwt
Hello. On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 09:14:30AM +0300, Vladimir Ciobanu wrote: > I'm not sure whether this is the best list to post to, but it's my > first guess. I'm using nasm to compile some code I wrote. The > developer-handbook suggests I use "-f elf", so that's what I did. Then I > linked it

Fwd: Re: Debugging symbols with nasm

2003-08-16 Thread Joshua Oreman
[Sorry, accidentally cc:ed -questions@ instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 09:14:30AM +0300 or thereabouts, Vladimir Ciobanu wrote: > I'm not sure whether this is the best list to post to, but it's my > first guess. I'm using nasm to compile some code I wrote. The > developer-

Re: specifying RAM size at boot?

2003-08-16 Thread Daniel Ellard
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > | I thought this was configurable by setting a variable in > | /boot/loader.conf and rebooting, but I haven't been able to find the > | right variable(s). (someone suggested MAXMEM, but this doesn' > | seem to do anything at all.) > > I think it is >

nVIDIA nForece2, again

2003-08-16 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
My main machine has just fried a southbridge, and I'm looking for a replacement. From what I can see, in the AMD range, the current best performer is the nVIDIA nForece2. I've read Bill Paul's description of the problems with the onboard NIC, and if I buy one of these boards, I'll certainly swell

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/nfsclient bootp_subr.c nfs_diskless.cnfs_vfsops.c nfsdiskless.h

2003-08-16 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jeremy wri tes: >[Redirected to -hackers because this isn't directly relevant to the > actual code committed] > >On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 05:04:02AM -0700, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Suggested replacement command sequence on the client: >> >> dd if=