Re: PCI quirk

2003-08-20 Thread Igor Pokrovsky
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:18:52PM +0200, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 03:12:17PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:48:41PM +0200, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: Hello all, I'd like to add a PCI quirk, which will enable SMBus on boot (it gets disabled

Re: Modem won't connect at full speed

2003-08-20 Thread Lars Eighner
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Don Lewis wrote: On 19 Aug, Lars Eighner wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Don Lewis wrote: On 19 Aug, Lars Eighner wrote: This has been answered by somebody on some forum, but I lost it. If you manually dial using cu or tip, what connection speed does the modem

Re: pkg_create

2003-08-20 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Adam Balogh wrote: On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 07:21, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Adam Balogh wrote: Hello, Has anyone found a solution for the pkg_create problem mentioned here in June? I'm planing to hack pkg_install with other reasons. So, I can take a look on this. Sem. That would indeed be

Re: Modem won't connect at full speed

2003-08-20 Thread Don Lewis
On 20 Aug, Lars Eighner wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Don Lewis wrote: I set the port setup in minicom to 57600, and got this on connect: atdt4857440 CONNECT 29333/ARQ/V90/LAPM/V42BIS and when I hung up the current settings looked like this: ati4 U.S. Robotics 56K Voice INT

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-20 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Wilko Bulte wrote (2003/08/20): On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:09:40AM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote: Rather than defensively assign the input monitor control (SOUND_MIXER_MONITOR) to an output, it'd be better to use a separate output control, eg add a control for SOUND_MIXER_OGAIN, should it

Re: new routing protocol

2003-08-20 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:02:40PM -0700, Jerry Toung wrote: dear hackers, Hello! I am in the process of implementing a routing protocol under 5.0. I, too, am in the process of implementing a routing protocol under -CURRENT. :^) This routing protocol is source route based and requires its

Re: new routing protocol

2003-08-20 Thread Paolo Pisati
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:02:40PM -0700, Jerry Toung wrote: My problem is dealing with debuging and portability. With this raw approach I guess I will have to run builkernel and installkernel all the time. How can I avoid that? I thought about kernel modules, but I don't know what

Re: new routing protocol

2003-08-20 Thread Jerry Toung
Thank you all for the inputs, this should get me started faster. Jerry. On Wednesday 20 August 2003 05:07 am, Paolo Pisati wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:02:40PM -0700, Jerry Toung wrote: My problem is dealing with debuging and portability. With this raw approach I guess I will have to

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-20 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:52:28AM +0200, Rudolf Cejka wrote: Wilko Bulte wrote (2003/08/20): On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:09:40AM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote: Rather than defensively assign the input monitor control (SOUND_MIXER_MONITOR) to an output, it'd be better to use a separate output

spltty / tty_imask question

2003-08-20 Thread Dave Dolson
A quick FreeBSD 4.7 kernel question: Is tty_imask supposed to have bits set for all sio devices? I.e., should bits 3 and 4 be set to indicate IRQ3 and IRQ4? I noticed by gdb of a running system that bit 4 was set, but not bit 3. We're seeing a panic due to re-acquiring COM_LOCK, and I was

spl protection of selrecord / selwakeup ?

2003-08-20 Thread Dave Dolson
In FreeBSD 4.7, When writing a device driver, which spl should be used when calling selrecord or selwakeup() ? Some of the functions called by those functions (e.g., pfind ) have no protection of their own. Some drivers use spltty() or splimp(). Can someone explain why splhigh() is not

Re: That movie

2003-08-20 Thread sales
Thank you for contacting Metro Link. This is an auto-response message with important instructions. Due to an inordinate amount of spam sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have eliminated this address and created a new one. Please resend your message to the following address, changing the words to

Re: [future patch] dropping user privileges on demand

2003-08-20 Thread Peter Wemm
ari wrote: Currently, root is the only user that can actually drop significant privileges, as root is the only user that has access to such functions. This is flawed --- any user should be able to relinquish his privileges, and i've begun a patch to put this into effect. However, the fact