has anyone implemented a handler for the machine
check exception [MCE] on a x86 architecture? e.g. a
xeon? In particular, on an SMP machine. What could
one do if this exception where to occur [its
intended to be fatal].
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
In a message written on Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 01:04:08PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> Since FreeBSD 4.0 we haven't had block devices. rfd0 is an alias for fd0
> now. You also don't need to specify the 'c' partition as the 'fd0' is
> already the entire media device -- rather than just the FreeBSD
Hi,
I've posted this request to 'questions' with no response, so now I'll
ask 'hackers'.
I'm a hobbyist, and for my personal education, I would like to learn how
to install FBSD from an existing filesystem, rather than from FTP or CD.
My intention is to copy the files to a directory on the second
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 05:16:09PM -0700, Jin Guojun [NCS] wrote:
> It is a vague problem on term of best performance -- what.
> NVidia has better memory bandwidth in AMD motherboards.
s/better/best/
> In terms of IDE performance, the AMD 760MP has
> the best performance in all chipsets in the wo
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:39:44PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:34:21PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote:
> > # dd bs=8192 of=/dev/fd0 if=memtest86-2.9/precomp.bin
> > 10+1 records in
> > 10+1 records out
> > 84480 bytes transferred in 3.775199 sec
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Markus Paluschek wrote:
> I have Compaq Proliant Server with 2 Pentium Xeon IV 2,4GHz processors.
> After installing FreeBSD-5.1, upgrading to FreeBSD-5.1-p2 by cvsup and
> recompiling kernel with SMP support I;ve download ircd-hybrid-7 sources
> and installed on user account
I have Compaq Proliant Server with 2 Pentium Xeon IV 2,4GHz processors.
After installing FreeBSD-5.1, upgrading to FreeBSD-5.1-p2 by cvsup and
recompiling kernel with SMP support
I;ve download ircd-hybrid-7 sources and installed on user account after
running it and writing /restart my.ircd.server I
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 07:54:45PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
+> I'm working on some archiving programs and need to (for various
+> reasons) keep track of a very large number of files so that I
+> can revisit them at the end of the operation. For example,
+> on extract, I need to set directory acc
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Right now, I'm storing the full pathname of each such
> file, but that is taking up a lot of memory, so I'm looking
> for a more compact approach. It occurred to me that
> the device number/inode (as returned by stat(2)) is another
> way to uniquely iden
I'm working on some archiving programs and need to (for various
reasons) keep track of a very large number of files so that I
can revisit them at the end of the operation. For example,
on extract, I need to set directory access times and permissions
after the complete extract is finished, which re
10 matches
Mail list logo
