On Monday 06 October 2003 12:10 am, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Sean Hamilton wrote:
> >
> > I have two Asus boards (A7V8X and A7V) which have in common a
> > Promise ATA controller. Both of these boards hang up for about a
> > minute during the boot of 5.1-RELEASE, and emit messages about ad
On Monday, 6 October 2003 at 21:46:24 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2003 at 19:10, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> Is your mailer screwed up? We're getting duplicates (a few
>> days later).
>
> I don't think so. Could they have been moderated? What do the
> headers say?
Somebody in France ha
On 6 Oct 2003 at 19:10, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Is your mailer screwed up? We're getting duplicates (a few
> days later).
I don't think so. Could they have been moderated? What do the headers say?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAI
Is your mailer screwed up? We're getting duplicates (a few
days later).
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2003 at 7:50, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > > On 16 Sep 2003 at 20:49, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 16 Sep
On Monday 06 October 2003 06:43, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> Note, I think this configuration would be useful in a lot of other
> applications as well. Consider someone who can get, say, a 128k
> symmetric DSL line, and a 56k up 1M down satellite link. If using
> this "trick" you could direct latency
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:11:05PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
> > In addition to keeping your NAT translations (as suggested by
> > Wes), you need to also keep routes for those entries as well, so
> > that preserved traff
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:43:46AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:11:05PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
> > In addition to keeping your NAT translations (as suggested by
> > Wes), you need to also keep routes for those entries as well, so
> > t
In a message written on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:11:05PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
> In addition to keeping your NAT translations (as suggested by
> Wes), you need to also keep routes for those entries as well, so
> that preserved traffic remains to route out the right ISP even if
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:54:00PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> That, by itself, is not hard. Here's the trick. I want the switch
> to be seamless. That is, if NAT is translating to ISP #1 and the
> application says switch to #2 the existing translations to #1 (until
> they go away naturally)
Hi,
I'm a FreeBSD src committer who deals with Dell hardware a lot. I've just
committed a port of afaapps to FreeBSD. I should be grateful if you could
add this to your extremely useful list of resources.
Please pass on my sincere thanks to your colleagues at Dell for providing us
with these too
It seems Sean Hamilton wrote:
> I'm looking to replace an aging fileserver with an Asus A7V600 board.
> Presently it appears FreeBSD does not support the serial ATA interface on
> the south bridge. As this appears to be the first Via serial ATA controller,
> am I safe in assuming this will not be
I'm looking to replace an aging fileserver with an Asus A7V600 board.
Presently it appears FreeBSD does not support the serial ATA interface on
the south bridge. As this appears to be the first Via serial ATA controller,
am I safe in assuming this will not be supported for some time?
I have tw
12 matches
Mail list logo