Hi,
sorry for coming back so late, but here are more details
to the Matrox problem:
Eric Anholt wrote on Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 08:44:51PM -0700:
AFAIK, you can enable bus mastering using pciconf(8) by setting appropriate
registers.
Why do you need any additional kernel module? Or I'm
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:52:07PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
Please note that there are *SEVERE* security issues with this module.
The module is not loaded into the kernel by default and, when loaded,
can only be used by users in the wheel group.
Why the wheel group? Until now, the only special
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:30:38AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please note that there are *SEVERE* security issues with this module.
The module is not loaded into the kernel by default and, when loaded,
can only be used by users in the wheel group.
Why the wheel group? Until now, the
What is the earliest point in the boot process that I can write to a pci
conf registers of a pci device? I would like to disable some sub devices
before they get probed.
Mark
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
both -current and -stable have the following snippet of code in
sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c:scclose():
{
...
int s;
if (SC_VTY(dev) != SC_CONSOLECTL) {
...
s = spltty();
...
}
As an effort to get more acquainted with the FreeBSD kernel, I have been
looking through how mmap works. I don't yet understand how it all fits
together, or of the exact implications things may have in the wild, but
I have noticed under some synthetic conditions, ie. mmaping small
non-contiguous
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
both -current and -stable have the following snippet of code in
sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c:scclose():
{
...
int s;
if (SC_VTY(dev) != SC_CONSOLECTL) {
...
s = spltty();
7 matches
Mail list logo