Hey,
You might consider doing some tests to see if you get packet loss to the
NFS/SMB server. That seems to be the issue. It would make sense that nfs
would act weird, as nfs doesnt like packet loss :) What is happening with
winamp seems logical as well, in this situation.
If it does indeed tur
Regards,
would you provide me with an example of network module under linux kernel 2.4.
--
--peace for all--
___
Take your business online with Officemaster. Sign up for a free trial today!
http://www.officemaster.ne
would you help me in writing network LKM under linux kernel 2.4, small examole would
be good.
--
--peace for all--
___
Web-based office space for rent. Free trial!
http://www.officemaster.net
___
maya Haddad writes:
> would you help me in writing network LKM under linux kernel 2.4, small examol
> e would be good.
You sent this to a FreeBSD list, you need to find a Linux list instead.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:22:35PM +1000, Q wrote:
> Can someone comment on whether this is something that has been done
> intentionally, or avoided in favour of some other yet to be implemented
> solution? Or is it still on someones todo list.
You can consult the FreeBSD and OpenBSD CVS reposito
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:55:50AM +0300, maya Haddad wrote:
> Regards,
>
> would you provide me with an example of network module under linux kernel 2.4.
No. Have a nice day!
Kris
P.S. Try a Linux list :-)
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:22:35PM +1000, Q wrote:
>
>> Can someone comment on whether this is something that has been done
>> intentionally, or avoided in favour of some other yet to be implemented
>> solution? Or is it still on someones todo l
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:38:45PM +0900, User Takawata wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:22:35PM +1000, Q wrote:
> >
> >> Can someone comment on whether this is something that has been done
> >> intentionally, or avoided in favour of some o
Thanks, I have already looked over the repositories to determine how
they differed. I wasn't really asking about the history of these changes
in the other projects, but rather the history of why FreeBSD HASN'T also
gone down this road. There doesn't appear to be anything in CVS or the
mail archives
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:51:28PM +1000, Q wrote:
> Thanks, I have already looked over the repositories to determine how
> they differed. I wasn't really asking about the history of these changes
> in the other projects, but rather the history of why FreeBSD HASN'T also
> gone down this road. Ther
Yes, it would appear this is a legacy thing that existed in the original
1994 import of the BSD 4.4 Lite source. Both FreeBSD and NetBSD still
use this technique, but OpenBSD changed to using Red-Black trees back in
Feb 2002.
The actual commit quote reads:
"use a red-black tree to find entries i
I seem to have stubbed my toe on another nasty little bootstrap problem.
My Gigabyte motherboard AWARD BIOS passes the wrong drive number in the
%dl register when it invokes the MBR bootstrap program, boot0.
This forces me to configure the MBR bootstrap with the setdrv option.
The noupdate option m
In the last episode (Oct 22), Q said:
> Yes, it would appear this is a legacy thing that existed in the
> original 1994 import of the BSD 4.4 Lite source. Both FreeBSD and
> NetBSD still use this technique, but OpenBSD changed to using
> Red-Black trees back in Feb 2002.
>
> The actual commit quot
Hi,
Im found pb compiled :
# cd /sys
# make
.
cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../common
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../btx/lib
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../.. -I. -DCOMPORT=0x3f8
-DCOMSPEED=9600 -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../../../lib/libstand/
-DT
sorry,
its my pb and not an Error.
Regards
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, rmkml wrote:
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:47:29 +0200 (CEST)
> From: rmkml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: pb compiled freebsd 49rc3 (iso)
>
> Hi,
>
> Im found pb compiled :
>
> # cd /sys
> # make
> .
>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:40:44AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > The actual commit quote reads:
> >
> > "use a red-black tree to find entries in the vm_map. augment the
> > red-black tree to find free space between entries. speeds up memory
> > allocation, etc..."
> >
> > I am wondering if there
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:51:58 -0400 (EDT)
Anthony Volodkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> You might consider doing some tests to see if you get packet loss to
> the
> NFS/SMB server. That seems to be the issue. It would make sense that
> nfs
> would act weird, as nfs doesnt like packet lo
On 22-Oct-2003 Dan Strick wrote:
> I seem to have stubbed my toe on another nasty little bootstrap problem.
> My Gigabyte motherboard AWARD BIOS passes the wrong drive number in the
> %dl register when it invokes the MBR bootstrap program, boot0.
> This forces me to configure the MBR bootstrap wit
Hi,
When contigmalloc and contigfree are used, the type of memory (M_xxx) is
ignored. Then vmstat -m does not report any statistics about the memory
usage of this kind of object.
Is it a bug or a feature ?
Regards,
Vincent
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 04:50:58PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:40:44AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > The actual commit quote reads:
> > >
> > > "use a red-black tree to find entries in the vm_map. augment the
> > > red-black tree to find free space between entries.
We have puzzled long and hard over this one. I have seen similar
questions in the past, but no answers:
Using a FreeBSD 4.8 NFS client, mount options are the defaults. I
watch for NFS activity using tcpdump.
Every single stat() or open() causes "access" RPCs on the wire.
In fact, doing "cat fi
Does FreeBSD support a device that will allow for the passing of all reads
and writes on it to a userland application? I wish to handle swapping
myself, preferably without any kernel hacking.
What would happen if the kernel decided to swap out such a process?
_
This is interesting, and demonstrates what I have been seeing, however
OpenBSD obviously has other issues with it's mmap implementation
entirely separate from this discussion.
The case we are discussing is only about the choice of search technique
used during the allocation of the mmap region from
> You seem to have mistaken [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you Poul for taking the time to correct me. Although checkpointing
was a specifically requested feature for FreeBSD, it was, given the
circumstances, an unforgivable error for me to announce it on a FreeBSD
list. The module
Hello,
I'm hoping to configure NFS service within a jail on a 5.1-CURRENT box.
The host envjailedment isn't running any services except ssh, and the
jail(8) man page leads me to believe the author thought NFS service
would work from within a jail.
However, neither mountd nor nfsd are happy runni
25 matches
Mail list logo
