Re: FreeBSD 5.1-p10 reproducible crash with Apache2

2003-11-05 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, [ISO-8859-1] "Branko F. Grac(nar" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > | Can you try updating to 5.1-current and see if the situation changes at > | all? A lot has changed since 5.1-release. If it's still broken in > | 5.1-c

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-p10 reproducible crash with Apache2

2003-11-05 Thread "Branko F. Grac(nar"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Silbersack wrote: | Can you try updating to 5.1-current and see if the situation changes at | all? A lot has changed since 5.1-release. If it's still broken in | 5.1-current, we can take a look into it. | | Thanks, I tried today with yesterday's

5.1-CURRENT (today), ath(4) + Dlink DWL-AG650 = no joy

2003-11-05 Thread Steven Hartland
Is anyone using this atm. Just got the card today as it was in the hardware compat list for the ath driver but I not having any joy with it. On insert or boot it identifies as: ath0: ... ... . But when using ifconfig I get: No support for the 5112 yet! ath0: unable to reset hardware; hal status 3

Re: Update: Debox sendfile modifications

2003-11-05 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > > > > > As to worker kthreads I think it's better to queue aio operation as it > > > > was made in src/sys/kern

Re: Update: Debox sendfile modifications

2003-11-05 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > > > As to worker kthreads I think it's better to queue aio operation as it > > > was made in src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c:aio_qphysio(). > > > > One of the things tha

Re: Update: Debox sendfile modifications

2003-11-05 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > As to worker kthreads I think it's better to queue aio operation as it > > was made in src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c:aio_qphysio(). > > One of the things that worries me about the proposal to use kernel worker > th

Re: Update: Debox sendfile modifications

2003-11-05 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote: > As to worker kthreads I think it's better to queue aio operation as it > was made in src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c:aio_qphysio(). One of the things that worries me about the proposal to use kernel worker threads to perform the I/O is that this can place a fairly

Re: Update: Debox sendfile modifications

2003-11-05 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Vivek Pai wrote: > > > If you were to have sendfile issue the disk reads, how would you signal > > completion? I guess one approach is to make the socket buffer appear to > > have no space while the sendfile-initiated read is in pro

Re: Update: Debox sendfile modifications

2003-11-05 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Vivek Pai wrote: > If you were to have sendfile issue the disk reads, how would you signal > completion? I guess one approach is to make the socket buffer appear to > have no space while the sendfile-initiated read is in progress, but > it seems to me that such an approach wou

Re: Update: Debox sendfile modifications

2003-11-05 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:25:43AM -0500, Vivek Pai wrote: > Mike Silbersack wrote: > >On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Vivek Pai wrote: > >>The one other aspect of this is that sf_bufs mappings are maintained for > >>a configurable amount of time, reducing the number of TLB ops. You can > >>specify the paramet