Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Awwighty, attached is a patch that converts getuptime() and dointr() to
use sysctl, and then adds the -a option to display all interrupts.
This one was tested on both RELENG_4 and HEAD (ref5) :)
Hmm, I don't like the fact that it displays a stray entry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Awwighty, attached is a patch that converts getuptime() and dointr() to
use sysctl, and then adds the -a option to display all interrupts.
This one was tested on both RELENG_4 and HEAD (ref5) :)
[...]
Jay Sern Liew wrote:
how do I find out the maximum (and minimum) value a long and int will hold
in C? (before it overflows or underflows)
#include limits.h
INT_MAX and INT_MIN are the max/min values for an int
LONG_MAX and LONG_MIN are the max/min values for long.
Also, see stdint.h, which is
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 08:49:52AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav) writes:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Awwighty, attached is a patch that converts getuptime() and dointr() to
use sysctl, and then adds the -a option to display all
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Point taken. I was going to attach a patch that uses sysctlbyname(3),
fixes another buglet in the !VMSTAT_SYSCTL case (and is less intrusive),
and removes the intrcnt/intrnames-related namelist definitions for the
VMSTAT_SYSCTL case. However, it seems
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:56:40AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Point taken. I was going to attach a patch that uses sysctlbyname(3),
fixes another buglet in the !VMSTAT_SYSCTL case (and is less intrusive),
and removes the
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 01:27:29PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote:
+ On Tuesday 18 November 2003 16:31, Rayson Ho wrote:
+ I am wondering if it is useful to have a secure file flag??
+
+ The secure file flag will be set for files that contain sensitive
+ data. Then the OS will take special care when
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:59:40AM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Such secure flag for running process could be also implemented with
multiple meanings:
Is the secure flag intended to protect the process image from the invoking
user as well as other users?
1. All freed pages have to be
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was thinking about the setgid bit too, but it can only be removed when
all of vmstat's functionality, not just dointr(), is converted to use
sysctl.
I know; I'm working on it, and am more than half done.
Still, here's the updated patch I was
this card worked fine the first time, now, after some fiddling with the
EMC/Clariion, the disks disappeared! BTW, windows sees them ok.
enabling debugging i get
...
isp0: Target 0 (Loop 0x0) Port ID 0xef (role Target) Arrived
Port WWN 0x50060160006003b4
Node WWN 0x50060160806003b4
isp0: port
Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this operation is able to fail (and of course it is) it should block
on unlink(2).
FreeBSD is not DOS; unlink(2) does not actually remove the file. It
is removed by the filesystem if the link count is zero when the vnode
is released, which may
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:41:05PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
+ If this operation is able to fail (and of course it is) it should block
+ on unlink(2).
+
+ FreeBSD is not DOS; unlink(2) does not actually remove the file. It
+ is removed by the filesystem if the link count is zero when
Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm aware of this, but what we want to think over here is something like
in-kernel 'rm -P'. So file will be overwriten even if it is opened
and/or link count is grater than 0.
That is not acceptable. First of all, it breaks a lot of assumptions
in
HI Fellows,
sorry bothering you.
There is probably an inssue with 5.1-RELEASE.
I got 2 hdd attached to separate cables/controllers.
At the boot time I can see something like:
ad0: 9732MB SAMSUNG SV1021H [19774/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
ad2: 76351MB SAMSUNG SV0802N [155127/16/63] at
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:13:46PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was thinking about the setgid bit too, but it can only be removed when
all of vmstat's functionality, not just dointr(), is converted to use
sysctl.
I know; I'm working on it,
Jay Sern Liew wrote:
how do I find out the maximum (and minimum) value a long and int will hold
in C? (before it overflows or underflows)
if it's compiler-dependent, then does anyone know where I can find the GCC
documentation for stuff like that?
It will be architecture dependent (32 or 64 bit
I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s
transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing 1.0:
usb0: Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
usb1: Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-B on uhci1
usb1: USB revision 1.0
usb2:
Write a simple C program to ++ an int or long variable and see when it overflows.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ext
Tim Kientzle
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 12:24 AM
To: Jay Sern Liew
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: integer
Hi,
Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Hi,
I need a new MAJOR number for our new device.
How can I get it?
I've read that FreeBSD doesn't use them any more.
But we may need it to not interfere with other device
drivers in previous releases of FreeBSD.
??? ce
On 21-Nov-2003 Ibrahim Abdullah wrote:
I've added an option to the from command so that it can also display the
subject header. For instance:
$ from
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 23:44:57 2003
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 23:50:59 2003
$ from -S
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov
On 21-Nov-2003 Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:13:46PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was thinking about the setgid bit too, but it can only be removed when
all of vmstat's functionality, not just dointr(), is converted to use
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:53:50AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[format recovered; Tim Kientzle wrote:]
Jay Sern Liew wrote:
how do I find out the maximum (and minimum) value a long
and int will hold
in C? (before it overflows or underflows)
#include limits.h
INT_MAX and
'Tis a bit of a waste of cpu time there.
On a two's complement system, which is probably all you'll come by, you
can find UINT_MAX by setting an unsigned integer to -1:
unsigned int i_max = -1;
A slightly more architecturally independent way of finding UINT_MAX
would be to set an unsigned
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s
transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing 1.0:
usb0: Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
usb1: Intel
Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then?
-James
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s
transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then?
It is intentionally not in GENERIC.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently got a usb 2.0
Is liibgcc_a not supposed to be on 5.1? Are the functions in some
other library?
Sorry to bother, but Google is silent!
Thanks,
--
Jim Durham
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
Could you point me to information as to why it is not in GENERIC?
-James
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then?
It is intentionally not in GENERIC.
On Fri, 21 Nov
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:37:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you point me to information as to why it is not in GENERIC?
Because it is not requireds for device to work, but on the other hand
in some cases doesn't work with ehci, such as hubs and interrupt
transfers.
Adding ehci is
On Friday 21 November 2003 05:30, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm aware of this, but what we want to think over here is something
like in-kernel 'rm -P'. So file will be overwriten even if it is
opened and/or link count is grater than 0.
That
On 2003-11-21 14:09 -0800, Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for performance, you really need to flush the on-device cache on each
pass to make sure the bit patterns get written to the platter in proper
order. I don't see any clever way to coalesce the writing of the
various patterns
On 21-Nov-2003 Richard Coleman wrote:
Jay Sern Liew wrote:
how do I find out the maximum (and minimum) value a long and int will hold
in C? (before it overflows or underflows)
if it's compiler-dependent, then does anyone know where I can find the GCC
documentation for stuff like that?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:26:10PM -0800, Len Sassaman wrote:
It is my intuition from this behavior that the sshd master process
listening for connections is unable to spawn a new process to complete
the authentication step, and thus the connection is being dropped.
There is no information of
33 matches
Mail list logo
