support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
How do I get __thread to work for me? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html it seems the assembler chokes on it? -- - Alfred Perlstein - Research Engineering Development Inc. - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684 ___ [EMAIL

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote: How do I get __thread to work for me? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html it seems the assembler chokes on it? Taking this code: #include stdio.h __thread int x; int main(int argc, char **argv) {

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote: How do I get __thread to work for me? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html it seems the assembler chokes on it? We don't have support for it yet. Why do you want

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 12:08] wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote: How do I get __thread to work for me? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html it seems the assembler

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 12:08, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote: How do I get __thread to work for me? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html it seems the assembler chokes

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 12:08] wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote: How do I get __thread to work for me?

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 14:31] wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 12:08] wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote: How do I get

USB link cables.

2003-12-21 Thread David Gilbert
Has anyone looked into supporting USB link cables? I see a number of these on eBay ... they appear to have two usb host connectors and some small bit of electronics (by the description). Are these propriatary ... or is there some sensible way this would work? Dave. --

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 14:31] wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 12:08] wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL

Re: USB link cables.

2003-12-21 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Monday 22 December 2003 14:39, David Gilbert wrote: Has anyone looked into supporting USB link cables? I see a number of these on eBay ... they appear to have two usb host connectors and some small bit of electronics (by the description). Are these propriatary ... or is there some

Re: USB link cables.

2003-12-21 Thread takawata
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Monday 22 December 2003 14:39, David Gilbert wrote: Has anyone looked into supporting USB link cables? I see a number of these on eBay ... they appear to have two usb host connectors and some small bit of electronics (by the description).

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 22), Daniel Eischen said: I'd like to stay away from maintaining libc_r any further; not that it can't be done, but with libkse and libthr around, why? Do gdb and pstack (in ports) handle libkse or libthr threads? libc_r is a great debugging tool, if nothing else. I