In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Philip Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 35 lines of wisdom included:
: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:39:45AM +, Philip Reynolds wrote:
: > [...]
: > > Does the magic number not then support multiple ABI's per sy
> Oh, just curious, why are you opposed to the use of structs? Does it make
> the code less portable due to alignment restrictions or something?
>
> Fred
to quote him:
"structures are not portable"
--
epibug - EPIT{A,ECH} *BSD User Group
l'asso des codeurs qui aiment les systemes BSD
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 35 lines of wisdom included:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:39:45AM +, Philip Reynolds wrote:
> [...]
> > Does the magic number not then support multiple ABI's per system
> > architecture, or is there some part of the puzzle I'm missing?
> >
> There's an EI_ABI
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:39:45AM +, Philip Reynolds wrote:
[...]
> Does the magic number not then support multiple ABI's per system
> architecture, or is there some part of the puzzle I'm missing?
>
There's an EI_ABIVERSION byte following the EI_OSABI byte, which
is both documented in the el
Hi,
At the moment, on both OpenBSD and FreeBSD (you're going to have to
excuse my lack of familiarity with NetBSD but I presume this
situation is similar) ELF files are branded via the CSU library,
inside a PT_NOTE section.
I've looked through as much documentation and list archives that I
could
5 matches
Mail list logo