Re: File system full

2004-04-05 Thread Clifton Royston
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:13:54PM -0400, Paul Khavkine wrote: > I see. > > Any way to find out what process is doing it ? > > I doubt it's a local DoS since noone has shell access to the machine. > > Thanx > Paul You should be able to use fstat (or lsof, if you have it installed) to find wha

Re: File system full

2004-04-05 Thread Paul Khavkine
I see. Any way to find out what process is doing it ? I doubt it's a local DoS since noone has shell access to the machine. Thanx Paul Clifton Royston wrote: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:00:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 14:49:42 -0400 > > From: Paul Khavkin

Re: File system full

2004-04-05 Thread Clifton Royston
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:00:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 14:49:42 -0400 > From: Paul Khavkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: File system full > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... > > Today for i have noticed that the /tmp partition on one of our mail > servers was reporte

Re: File system full

2004-04-05 Thread Paul Khavkine
Well it did go down to 63% now but the partition is COMPLETELY empty, 16K used. Even 63% doesn't make sense. How long for softupdates to flush all deleted data usually ? The box is 4.6-STABLE BTW. Thanx Paul Mark wrote: > Paul Khavkine wrote: > > > Today for i have noticed that the /tmp par

Re: File system full

2004-04-05 Thread Mark
Paul Khavkine wrote: > Today for i have noticed that the /tmp partition on one of our mail > servers was reported as > full. I have checked if there's any files in /tmp but found that it > wasn't true. > > > du reports that /tmp is only using 50K. > > After a few minutes the size changed from 100%

File system full

2004-04-05 Thread Paul Khavkine
Hi folks. Today for i have noticed that the /tmp partition on one of our mail servers was reported as full. I have checked if there's any files in /tmp but found that it wasn't true. du reports that /tmp is only using 50K. After a few minutes the size changed from 100% to 66%. Even that mak

Re: Pointers about CPU load measuring

2004-04-05 Thread Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz
Hello, Thanks Dan. This is the best. I also tried using kvm, but code is longer and the program shall run as root. I'm working on a daemon which shall evaluate CPU load and SHALL not run as root. Best regards, Jose-Marcio Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Apr 02), Dag-Erling Smorgrav s