> Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 14:52:35, zagarin wrote about "sshd & pam & getpwnam()":
>
> > Does anybody know, why sshd call getpwnam() even if user is
> > authenticating via PAM? This broke remote authentication (RADIUS,
> > TACACS+) when user doesn't exist in local password database.
>
> Because
Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 14:52:35, zagarin wrote about "sshd & pam & getpwnam()":
> Does anybody know, why sshd call getpwnam() even if user is
> authenticating via PAM? This broke remote authentication (RADIUS,
> TACACS+) when user doesn't exist in local password database.
Because you mix two di
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:52:35PM +0400, Alexey Zagarin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Does anybody know, why sshd call getpwnam() even if user is
> authenticating via PAM? This broke remote authentication (RADIUS,
> TACACS+) when user doesn't exist in local password database.
The user must exist in some
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:49:19PM -0600, Stephen Hurd wrote:
> Well, possibly due to editorial content, kern/50827 has been completely
> ignored. Not sure exactly the correct method of bringing something like
> this up, but am I the only one who finds flock(), dotlock, and fcntl()
> locks insuffi
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 01:24:53PM -0700, Lev Walkin wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
> >Lev Walkin wrote:
> >
> >>Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>
> >>>I'm trying to port open1x xsupplicant, and it uses PF_PACKET to get
> >>>relevant packets (of appropriate ethernet type). I looked around in
> >>>/usr/include a
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:41:33AM -0300, Klaus Schneider wrote:
> I'm running FreeBSD with 2 NFS mounts over tcp, apache 1.3.31,
> openwebmail(read/write on both nfs mounted filesystems, /var/mail
> spooldir and webmail userdir) and proftpd.
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 #3: Mon Jun
Personally I prefer the flat file configuration, as it's much more
intuitive, and an obfuscated method of configuring my kernel just isn't
for me. To each his own of course, but I myself will always stick to
vi'ing my kernel's config. It's the fastest, most efficient way IMHO.
(Not to say, that
:)
I have started development on a kernel configuration tool for FreeBSD
5.2.1 (other versions aren't supported yet)
It's similar to the linux kernel's make config and xf86config in terms of
way of working, and it's written in ISO C++ (requires g++ compiler)
Get the source:
(DENMARK)
http://www
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:15:45AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> I was looking at it and came across getifaddrs(). This function does not
> depend on a open socket (yes, mine is AF_LINK, sockaddr_dl), and
> apparently returns a list of all interfaces. Is there really no other
> way than to trave
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:26:56AM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
> It was discussed when phk merged it into kern___getcwd() last
> year, and on at least one other occasion. However, I can't seem
> to find the relevant thread in the mail archives. Perhaps phk or
> dwmalone remember.
The only proble
I'm running FreeBSD with 2 NFS mounts over tcp, apache 1.3.31,
openwebmail(read/write on both nfs mounted filesystems, /var/mail
spooldir and webmail userdir) and proftpd.
# uname -a
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 #3: Mon Jun 28 07:18:32 BRT 2004
src-all last updated at: Sat Jun 19 09:28:59 BRT 2004.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 11:12:20AM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
> +> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004, Kentucky Mandeloid Mo. wrote:
> +> > I'm writng a smal kernel module that catches file access syscalls.
> +> > At every syscall I need a full name of file is
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 11:12:20AM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
+> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004, Kentucky Mandeloid Mo. wrote:
+> > I'm writng a smal kernel module that catches file access syscalls.
+> > At every syscall I need a full name of file is being passed to a syscall.
+> > I'm getting it with a pat
Hi all,
I've got strange problem. Well, every day I get an email as a result
of periodic ran every night from cron. I also set up a few weeks ago
postfix with mysql. First I tested postfix so I got a lot of errors from
postfix, but after that I set up it properly and now it works great. Bu
14 matches
Mail list logo
