Hi,
Just following up to myself. I have a bit more info. I used vnconfig
like so to attach my dd "image":
vnconfig -s labels -c vn0 xena-home.dd
And while fsck and disklable both refuse to believe it's at all valid, I
can do the following:
mount -o ro -f /dev/vn0c /mnt/tmp
And for the most p
Hi,
I'm sorry for hitting this list, but I'm trying to target people with some
good old-fashioned recovery procedures in their toolboxes, and people that
have a better understanding of UFS than I do.
I'll try to keep this brief. We are looking for either some "here you go"
help, or if there's so
Hi,
Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Le Monday 19 July 2004 22:43, Eitarou Kamo a écrit :
Me too. WinXP, RedHat, FreeBSD-4.10 and Solaris8 live
in my laptop. And RedHat has 2 kernels bootable. So I have
5 OSes bootable. If 2 linux live in dos basic partition each other
and each linux create extend partit
Le Monday 19 July 2004 22:43, Eitarou Kamo a écrit :
> Me too. WinXP, RedHat, FreeBSD-4.10 and Solaris8 live
> in my laptop. And RedHat has 2 kernels bootable. So I have
> 5 OSes bootable. If 2 linux live in dos basic partition each other
> and each linux create extend partition, is it possible to
Hello,
I've got a grub.conf example with 5 OS'es at :
http://therbelot.free.fr/Install_Linux/grub.conf
(including 2 FreeBSD's in the same slice/"primary partition")
Happy reading,
TfH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.fre
> >Not to blow my own horn, but:
> >
> >http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/05/09/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
> >
> >
> If you have a time and you would like to run current, release, stable
> and extra
> a few OS, Install *Linux and use extended partition(slice for BSD guys)
> and Grub, and you can r
Hi,
Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Not to blow my own horn, but:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/05/09/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
If you have a time and you would like to run current, release, stable
and extra
a few OS, Install *Linux and use extended partition(slice for BSD guys)
and Grub, and you
Not to blow my own horn, but:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/05/09/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 07:11:07AM -0500, Stephen Hocking wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm looking at creating multiple versions of FreeBSD on the one disk - sharing
> perhaps one or two filesystems, but with t
From: "Stephen Hocking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm looking at creating multiple versions of FreeBSD on the one disk - sharing
> perhaps one or two filesystems, but with totally separate /, /usr and /var.
> Does anyone have a quick way to do this from a clean install? I've done this
> under a number
All,
I'm looking at creating multiple versions of FreeBSD on the one disk - sharing
perhaps one or two filesystems, but with totally separate /, /usr and /var.
Does anyone have a quick way to do this from a clean install? I've done this
under a number of OS's, but can't think how to do it with
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Paul Querna wrote:
> I have a question about using KQueue() in multi-threaded situations. A
> couple months ago I wrote the KQueue support for Apache2/APR. I am now
> investigating a pseudo Event/Worker MPM to better handle KeepAlive
> Requests. (support for KQueue in Apache i
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:51:09PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> Probably the onl thing to do is to refuse to try an load the modules if
J> you are not running
J> in the context of a process..
What about adding this check to ng_make_node()? It works for me OK.
if (curthread->t
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:51:09PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> >> there is problem when linker_load_module() is called from a kernel
J> >>thread with no associated user process, and it asks to load module by
J> >>name, not by filename. With such parameters it requires looking through
J> >>dev
13 matches
Mail list logo
