On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:48:06 -0700, you wrote:
I have a HP DL380g3 I was running 5.2.1-REL on (I think it was on -p9).
I did a source upgrade to 5.3-beta7, including mergemaster -p, followed
by mergemaster which did upgrade /etc/ssh/sshd_config.
When I am now trying to connect from SecureCRT, I
Hi~
This is my first time to post question here, and also
I am a newbie on FreeBSD. A confusing thing I discover
is: Why the binary code I compiled(for example,telnet
command)compare with the original one is diffirent,
either size or md5 hash value, What's going on? Are
the source files differ
Jerry wrote:
Hi~
This is my first time to post question here, and also
I am a newbie on FreeBSD. A confusing thing I discover
is: Why the binary code I compiled(for example,telnet
command)compare with the original one is diffirent,
either size or md5 hash value, What's going on? Are
the source
Jerry wrote:
--- Andreas Kohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi,
you might be using different optimization flags than
the release
building cluster.
Also make sure that you have really the correct
sources, and not a newer
version from CVS.
Hi~ Andreas,
I just used make command with default
Hi~ All
This is my first time to post question here, and also
I am a newbie on FreeBSD. A confusing thing I discover
is: Why the binary code I compiled(for example,telnet
command)compare with the original one is diffirent,
either size or md5 hash , What's going on? Are the
source files differ
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 13:11, Andreas Kohn wrote:
Jerry wrote:
--- Andreas Kohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi,
you might be using different optimization flags than
the release
building cluster.
Also make sure that you have really the correct
sources, and not a newer
version from
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:11:09PM +0200, Andreas Kohn wrote:
if your source files are *exactly* the same versions used as on the
building cluster, and you have *exactly* the same compilation options,
it would still be possible to have different binaries. For example if
the files included some
I have stumbled upon a local DoS (non-kernel) while writing a VoIP app for
FreeBSD. The DoS exists when two ioctl calls (or less/more?) are followed by
a malloc call to malloc a pointer in global scope which is then followed by
two more (or less/more?) ioctl calls. The result is a stack smash,
Thank you all for explaining so patiently, I have
somewhat of understanding with this issue ~
very appreciated all who commented.
Jerry
-
Yahoo!
100MB
http://mail.yahoo.com.tw/
___
[EMAIL
9 matches
Mail list logo