--nextPart12368324.QZVX1XDbdm
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
Does anyone know of a way to manipulate the modem control lines from userla=
nd?
SVR4 has termiox and friends but I can't see an
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:03, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Nov 16, 2004, at 10:48 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know of a way to manipulate the modem control lines from
userland?
See sys/ttycom.h, in particular the following ioctls:
Unk thanks.
Dunce cap on :)
#define TIOCMSET
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM YT an option to IPFIREWALL, you have to build your kernel with
DM YT both IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT:
DM YT ...
DM YT I did. See the config contents in originating posting. That was the essence
DM YT of the problem -- familiar procedure unexplainably not working.
DM
DM
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:48:34AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
I tried to install Windows XP SP2 on qemu over FreeBSD 6-current
like following command, but failed.
# qemu -boot d -cdrom /dev/cd0 windows.img
Yeah physical cdroms don't work currently as mentioned in
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 06:58:36PM +, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:48:34AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
I tried to install Windows XP SP2 on qemu over FreeBSD 6-current
like following command, but failed.
# qemu -boot d -cdrom /dev/cd0 windows.img
I applied the patch that Brooks suggested to my 5.2 system
uname -a output:
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE $4: Mon Nov 8 23:27:59 PST
2004 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COGNITION i386
I still get watchdog timeouts, and eventually a kernel panic which seems
to be related. Is there an
Hello all,
I know this is likely a stupid question, but no amount of
googling is making this clear to me.
Which source base is more recent, RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_3?
Cheers,
Sam
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:22:43AM -0500, Sam wrote:
I know this is likely a stupid question, but no amount of
googling is making this clear to me.
Which source base is more recent, RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_3?
RELENG_5_3 will be the most up to date for 5.3
RELENG_5 will be the most up to date
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:
snip
I still get watchdog timeouts, and eventually a kernel panic which seems
to be related. Is there an additional patch to the 5.2 code that I can
apply to take care of the watchdog timeout?
That's odd, to say the least. I looked at the patch,
I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day, web,
webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce filesystem
corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting them.
I don't think I'm up to debugging this, but I may be able to provide
an exercise platform.
Dave.
Another odd thing about snapshots is that the time shown by ls -l is
mostly current. Havn't found a rule for that yet. ls -lu seems to
show the creation time even tho the man page for ls says that's the
last access time.
Since the snapshot itself shouldn't (logically) change after creation,
it
David Gilbert wrote:
I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day, web,
webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce filesystem
corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting them.
I don't think I'm up to debugging this, but I may be able to provide
an
In the last episode (Nov 17), David Gilbert said:
Another odd thing about snapshots is that the time shown by ls -l is
mostly current. Havn't found a rule for that yet. ls -lu seems to
show the creation time even tho the man page for ls says that's the
last access time.
Since the snapshot
Julian == Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Julian David Gilbert wrote:
I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day,
web, webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce
filesystem corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting
them.
I don't
Looks like there's a couple of versions of the card. I have the PCM200
Version 2, whatever that means for the chipset. Linksys tech support
thought it was the ADMtek chipset, but I suppose there could be a couple
different ADMtek chipsets available ... I'm waiting to hear back from
technical
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:
Looks like there's a couple of versions of the card. I have the PCM200
Version 2, whatever that means for the chipset. Linksys tech support
thought it was the ADMtek chipset, but I suppose there could be a couple
different ADMtek chipsets
This is from the writers of the Linux driver for the PCM200. I wonder
if there's a good technical manual or guide on writing drivers for that
chipset.
Richard
Original Message
Subject: Re: Linksys PCM200 chipset
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:05:10 +0800
From: Allen()NDP FAE
Okay, so I got unlazy and threw some stuff together. Try these patches;
this will default the PCM200 cards to store-and-forward. This might help.
-ksaihr
[...]
--- /usr/src/sys/pci/if_dcreg.h Thu Aug 5 13:46:14 2004
+++ if_dcreg.h Sun Oct 24 13:09:31 2004
@@ -98,6 +98,13 @@
#define
I applied the patch that Brooks suggested to my 5.2 system
uname -a output:
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE $4: Mon Nov 8 23:27:59 PST
2004 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COGNITION i386
I still get watchdog timeouts, and eventually a kernel panic which seems
to be related. Is
Looks like there's a couple of versions of the card. I have the PCM200
Version 2, whatever that means for the chipset. Linksys tech support
now, that's why I suggested to leave the card's version number in the
description string, as in my original patch!
the patch _is_ for PCM200 v.2 (and
20 matches
Mail list logo
