> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=291393+0+archive/2004/cvs-all/20041121.cvs-all
After further digging, here is the main commit (in order to show
greetings at least) :
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2472977+0+archive/2004/cvs-all/20041114.cvs-all
Regargs,
--
Jeremie Le
> if you setup a vlan devices with parent one of emX or reX (this what I
> have at the moment)
> which has hardware vlan tagging just try to run tcpdump (without -p) and
> the vlans will
> die :). That doesn't happen with parent devices not supporting
> hwtagging. And this totally
> excludes pos
João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote:
What is the practical diference? Performance?
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
Any other drives (as far as I
Quoting Justin Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was hopeful for using the Flash plugin with FireFox in FreeBSD when I
> noticed that there was a port for it. However, the plugin seems to be
> pretty dated, though I can't tell exactly what version of the player it
> is.
I think you're looking at th
In the last episode (Nov 22), David Gilbert said:
> > "Brian" == Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian> Long strings of NUL bytes? Missing data? Spam (from the same
> Brian> file, or from other files)?
>
> Well... I don't really know db file formats. Most of the corr
> "Søren" == Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Søren> David Gilbert wrote:
>>> "João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>> João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
>> João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right
> "Brian" == Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> Long strings of NUL bytes? Missing data? Spam (from the same
Brian> file, or from other files)?
Well... I don't really know db file formats. Most of the corruption I
found in berkley db files. mailgraph uses rrd. m
Hello,
I was hopeful for using the Flash plugin with FireFox in FreeBSD when I
noticed that there was a port for it. However, the plugin seems to be
pretty dated, though I can't tell exactly what version of the player it
is. Does anyone know if the author is working on a new version? I'd be
cur
Hi,
if you setup a vlan devices with parent one of emX or reX (this what I
have at the moment)
which has hardware vlan tagging just try to run tcpdump (without -p) and
the vlans will
die :). That doesn't happen with parent devices not supporting
hwtagging. And this totally
excludes possibilit
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really imp
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 04:22:54PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have set an idle timeout for the hard-disk. But when there is no
> user activity there are frequent disk accesses.
> How can one trace disk access?
> I'd like to know the kind of access and on which files/directories
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:32:13PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> > "Julian" == Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Julian> David Gilbert wrote:
>
> >> I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day,
> >> web, webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduc
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performa
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
added one to my comput
David Gilbert wrote:
"João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right?
Well... from what I've read, the WD bridged drives do have queueing
becaus
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
> > Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
>
> > Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
>
> I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
> added one to my compu
David Gilbert wrote:
"João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right?
Well... from what I've read, the WD bridged drives do have queueing
because they had a
> "João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a
João> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right?
Well... from what I've read, the WD bridged drives do have queueing
because they had an ATA-100 impl
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote:
What is the practical diference? Performance?
I don't know how much of it to believe, since it is marketing material,
but the Seagate white paper on their site claims that all the
command-queueing stuff b
> "Charles" == Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] João Carlos Mendes Luís
Charles> wrote:
>> What is the practical diference? Performance?
Charles> I don't know how much of it to believe, since it is marketing
Charles> material, but the S
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote:
What is the practical diference? Performance?
I don't know how much of it to believe, since it is marketing material,
but the Seagate white paper on their site claims that all the
command-queueing stuff brings the performance very
Howdy,
I've been digging around google for an hour now trying to find info
on multipathing in freebsd, I've stumbled on a few patches that pull it
off, latest of which was for 4.8-stable located at:
http://www.dsm.fordham.edu/~tanzer/multipath/
Unfortunately it's tossing errors during compile
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
added one to my computer, which came with a Maxtor 6Y080L0. My main
disk intensive operation i
Hello,
I have set an idle timeout for the hard-disk. But when there is no
user activity there are frequent disk accesses.
How can one trace disk access?
I'd like to know the kind of access and on which files/directories/
nodes. I'd like to log on the console or on a memory disk file.
-Hanspeter
> "João" == João Carlos Mendes Luís <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
João> What is the practical diference? Performance? FUJISHIMA
Well... one practical difference is: what are you paying for? Same
old crap with a new connector?
One really practical difference is that the SiI 3114 and 3112 chi
What is the practical diference? Performance?
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive
Steven Hartland wrote:
Ah just added TCQ but still bridged I stand corrected :)
Right, I guess they just pulled it out from the attic, they had it on
some PATA devices back when, but there it newer caught on either :)
--
-Søren
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mai
Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe the second gen Raptors ( 74Gb ) are also native SATA
nope.
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
Any other drives (as far as I know, of co
Ah just added TCQ but still bridged I stand corrected :)
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "FUJISHIMA Satsuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://techreport.com/reviews/2004q1/raptor-wd740gd/index.x?pg=1
|Serial ATA interface Marvell 88i8030C bridge
=
At Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:39:57 -,
Steven Hartland wrote:
> I believe the second gen Raptors ( 74Gb ) are also native SATA
No.
http://techreport.com/reviews/2004q1/raptor-wd740gd/index.x?pg=1
|Serial ATA interface Marvell 88i8030C bridge
___
[EMAIL P
I believe the second gen Raptors ( 74Gb ) are also native SATA
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "FUJISHIMA Satsuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive with
serial-parallel bridge.
At Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500,
David
32 matches
Mail list logo
