Re: ata_catch_inflight causes boot freeze

2005-01-16 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 16.01.2005 um 05:11 schrieb Kris Maglione: On my laptop, while the call to ata_catch_inflight is in dev/ata/ata-all.c, my laptop freezes at boot, after detecting acd0 and doing GEOM: Configure for ad0. I don't mind commenting out the line in my builds, but others shouldn't have to go

Re: ata_catch_inflight causes boot freeze

2005-01-16 Thread Søren Schmidt
Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 16.01.2005 um 05:11 schrieb Kris Maglione: On my laptop, while the call to ata_catch_inflight is in dev/ata/ata-all.c, my laptop freezes at boot, after detecting acd0 and doing GEOM: Configure for ad0. I don't mind commenting out the line in my builds, but others

Re: Geode integrated peripherals support?

2005-01-16 Thread Milan Obuch
On Saturday 15 January 2005 00:29, you wrote: is someone working with Geode processors? There are many peripherals integrated, but not all supported under FreeBSD. Has someone already done some patched for this? We use the geode and haven't noticed the lack. What's missing? Warner

Above the law? (was: You gotta be kidding .... Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/specfs spec_vnops.c)

2005-01-16 Thread Linus Caldwell
On Sunday, 16 January 2005 at 11:46:35 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: Mike Smith wrote: Instead, the appropriate way is to turn off user level blockdev access entirely. This is the conclusion that was made weeks ago when you first started your rampage to blow away block devices. A

Re: Above the law? (was: You gotta be kidding .... Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/specfs spec_vnops.c)

2005-01-16 Thread Dan Langille
On 16 Jan 2005 at 17:30, Linus Caldwell wrote: [Although this is formally a reply to Matt, I'm addressing the committers community here] Then please address to to the committers mailing list. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference -

Re: Above the law? (was: You gotta be kidding .... Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/specfs spec_vnops.c)

2005-01-16 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Sunday, 16 January 2005 at 17:30:51 +, Linus Caldwell wrote: On Sunday, 16 January 2005 at 11:46:35 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: I can't believe this. Poul has completely ignored the proposal, time table, sysctl, and the several major figures that supported it and has gone

Re: Above the law? (was: You gotta be kidding .... Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/specfs spec_vnops.c)

2005-01-16 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 07:13:07AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote.. On Sunday, 16 January 2005 at 17:30:51 +, Linus Caldwell wrote: On Sunday, 16 January 2005 at 11:46:35 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: I can't believe this. Poul has completely ignored the proposal, time table,