I am trying to get a vmcore to appear after a kernel panic. I have done
EVERYTHING in the developers handbook, including adding dumpdev in the rc.conf
and a savecore with flags -f. My savecore directory is /var/crash. but nothing
appears in it after the kernel panic except the minfree file and
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:33, Ashwin Chandra wrote:
I am trying to get a vmcore to appear after a kernel panic. I have done
EVERYTHING in the developers handbook, including adding dumpdev in the
rc.conf and a savecore with flags -f. My savecore directory is /var/crash.
but nothing appears in it
Hi,
i am looking for how to accurately calculate the CPU utilization per
process.
i have looked through the top sources, and found out it's using the kvm
lib, which isn't suitable for my purpose.
is there a way to accurately calculate %CPU based on information from the
struct proc ? it does
Smith III, Edward Mr. CAA/ISC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the CDDL license compatible with the BSD and MIT licenses?
Listening to the legal department from Sun - yes.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
Jonathan Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the CDDL license compatible with the BSD and MIT licenses?
-ed
According to the OpenBSD-folks: NO
See yesterdays thread on openbsd-tech.
In contrary to the GPL, the CDDL allows you to combine code under
the BSD license and the CDDL without taking
Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-02-10 at 20:08:10 Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is there a chance to have star integrated into FreeBSD?
Tim Kientzle already produced a BSD-licensed version of tar, having
many features: http://people.freebsd.org/~kientzle/libarchive/
(He even
David Schultz wrote:
As the conclusion, which state are available?
Pre Post
--
BSD license CDDL
GPL license CDDL
MIT license CDDL
CDDL BSD license
CDDL GPL license
CDDL MIT license
The
Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Last night, I did convert star from a GPL tool into a CDDL
tool. This now makes star compliant with the BSD philosophy.
Is there a chance to have star integrated into FreeBSD?
As others have noted, CDDL != BSD licence and the base system
already
I actually changed dumpdir to /usr/crash since /var did not have enough
space to accomodate 512 MB. But /usr has 60gigs. When the kernel panics it
just crashes, I never get a message saying dumping Savecore upon
reboot says no dumps found. So i believe the problem is that the system is
In the last episode (Feb 12), Nimnod said:
i am looking for how to accurately calculate the CPU utilization per
process. i have looked through the top sources, and found out it's
using the kvm lib, which isn't suitable for my purpose.
Why not? You don't need to be setuid root to call kvm
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:16:51 -0600, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 12), Nimnod said:
i am looking for how to accurately calculate the CPU utilization per
process. i have looked through the top sources, and found out it's
using the kvm lib, which isn't suitable for
Ashwin Chandra said:
I actually changed dumpdir to /usr/crash since /var did not have enough
space to accomodate 512 MB. But /usr has 60gigs. When the kernel panics
it
just crashes, I never get a message saying dumping Savecore upon
You dump to a device, not a path. Because the kernel is
ryan,
i think i was a bit vague in my email. I am correctly usnig the swap device
and dump directory. Before the system reboots the core should be saved from
the swap device (before it mounts) and into the path that i specified.
dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b, our 2gb swap device and dumpdir=/usr/crash
So
Ashwin Chandra said:
ryan,
i think i was a bit vague in my email. I am correctly usnig the swap
device
and dump directory. Before the system reboots the core should be saved
from
the swap device (before it mounts) and into the path that i specified.
dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b, our 2gb swap device
The following small makefile doesn't behave as one would naively
expect:
MANLANG?=foo
all:
.for i in ${MANLANG}
.if empty(${i})
@echo foo ${i}
.endif
.endfor
ports-i386%make
foo foo
foo
I think this is because the .if evaluation is happening too early, and
it's not being done after the
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 06:32:01PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
The following small makefile doesn't behave as one would naively
expect:
MANLANG?=foo
all:
.for i in ${MANLANG}
.if empty(${i})
@echo foo ${i}
.endif
.endfor
ports-i386%make
foo foo
foo
I think this is
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:32:01 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The following small makefile doesn't behave as one would naively
expect:
This problem is known to me for pretty very long time when I reported to
Brandon D. Valentine for linux-flashplugins6 issue.. You will see in the
I saw on a few of the lists here how linux uses ptmalloc2 and it
outperforms bsd's malloc. I tried to do some research into it and
found PHK's pdf on it and it seems bsd's malloc was ment to be ok in
most every situation. Because of this it shines when primary storage is
seriously over
18 matches
Mail list logo
