mysql threads

2005-03-21 Thread iwan
Hi, I'm new in freebsd. I have a question about mysqld threads. I using freebsd 5.1-RELEASE, default installation. Then I installing mysql 4.xx.xx (i forgot). Not like httpd which automatic creating threads when more connection exist. Mysql in my box is not creating threads, it only exist with

Re: ntfsprogs under FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE not working?

2005-03-21 Thread Florent Thoumie
Le Vendredi 18 mars 2005 à 09:25 -0800, Murray Stokely a écrit : I'm having trouble using ntfsls from a recently built sysutils/ntfsprogs port. Is anyone successfully using this port? The package is only 230k when built without GNOME VFS support, but it just doesn't seem to work. I'd like

Re: passwd permissions

2005-03-21 Thread c0ldbyte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, H. S. wrote: Hey, I'm using FreeBSD on various servers for many time now, and there is something that always bothered me. It is related to /etc/passwd and /etc/pwd.db permissions. I have custom (0640) permissions on these files.

Re: passwd permissions

2005-03-21 Thread David Malone
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:33:25AM -0500, c0ldbyte wrote: About the easiest way to go about it would be to set the umask for passwd command well in operation. Unfortunately, I don't think this will work because pwd_mkdb explicitly sets the permissions on the files in question. David.

Re: ntfsprogs under FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE not working?

2005-03-21 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: Le Vendredi 18 mars 2005 à 09:25 -0800, Murray Stokely a écrit : I'm having trouble using ntfsls from a recently built sysutils/ntfsprogs port. Is anyone successfully using this port? The package is only 230k when built

Re: ntfsprogs under FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE not working?

2005-03-21 Thread Florent Thoumie
Le Lundi 21 mars 2005 à 13:58 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker a écrit : On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: Le Vendredi 18 mars 2005 à 09:25 -0800, Murray Stokely a écrit : I'm having trouble using ntfsls from a recently built sysutils/ntfsprogs port. Is anyone

Re: Causing a process switch to test a theory.

2005-03-21 Thread Matthew Hagerty
Zera William Holladay wrote: If you post the section(s) of code in question, then you'll probably elicit some responses. PIPE_BUF is a POSIX defined minimum, so you might grep for sections of code that contain fpathconf(*, _PC_PIPE_BUF) to determine if the programmers took this into

Re: Causing a process switch to test a theory.

2005-03-21 Thread Matthew Hagerty
Steve Watt wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Knowing if Apache could possibly write interleaved logs when writing to a pipe is critical to a program I'm developing which receives log entries from Apache via a pipe. That's another layer of indirection, though. If all

Re: Causing a process switch to test a theory.

2005-03-21 Thread Stephan Uphoff
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 09:16, Matthew Hagerty wrote: Zera William Holladay wrote: If you post the section(s) of code in question, then you'll probably elicit some responses. PIPE_BUF is a POSIX defined minimum, so you might grep for sections of code that contain fpathconf(*, _PC_PIPE_BUF) to

Re: mysql threads

2005-03-21 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 21), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm new in freebsd. I have a question about mysqld threads. I using freebsd 5.1-RELEASE, default installation. Then I installing mysql 4.xx.xx (i forgot). Not like httpd which automatic creating threads when more connection exist. Mysql in

Re: Causing a process switch to test a theory.

2005-03-21 Thread Steve Watt
On Mar 21, 10:05, Matthew Hagerty wrote: } Steve Watt wrote: } In [EMAIL PROTECTED], } [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } That's another layer of indirection, though. If all of the children } have separate pipes to the parent, and then the parent logs to your } program, all should be fine. } } That's

ng_tty problem

2005-03-21 Thread Jerry Toung
Hello List, I want to monitor traffic on serial port /dev/cuaa0. I am trying to build the following netgraph. socket --- tee node --- tty node I run ngctl manually with the error message below: + mkpeer . tee hook1 left + name .:hook1 mytee + mkpeer mytee: tty right hook ngctl : send msg:

USB 2.0 with bogus Data Rate

2005-03-21 Thread Carlos Silva aka|Danger_Man|
Hi hackers, I have a little problem with my external disk drive, my data transfer rate is 1.000MB/s. I have USB 2.0 so the rate is larger, right? Somebody has an idea how to enlarge the rate? Regards, Carlos osiris# dmesg | grep usb dmesg | grep da0 usb0: Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller

Re: USB 2.0 with bogus Data Rate

2005-03-21 Thread Julian Elischer
Carlos Silva aka|Danger_Man| wrote: Hi hackers, I have a little problem with my external disk drive, my data transfer rate is 1.000MB/s. I have USB 2.0 so the rate is larger, right? Somebody has an idea how to enlarge the rate? the data rate is bogus because it is printed by the scsi/cam code

Re: USB 2.0 with bogus Data Rate

2005-03-21 Thread Carlos Silva aka|Danger_Man|
Julian Elischer wrote: Carlos Silva aka|Danger_Man| wrote: Hi hackers, I have a little problem with my external disk drive, my data transfer rate is 1.000MB/s. I have USB 2.0 so the rate is larger, right? Somebody has an idea how to enlarge the rate? the data rate is bogus because it is printed

NIC detected, but won't DHCP or configure

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Robinson
Dear FreeBSD hackers, I posted the following question on freebsd-questions. Two kind souls kicked it around for a little and suggested that I pass it on to you. I have a laptop with a netowrk card that seems to be successfully detected under FreeBSD, Knoppix, and WinXP, but will only work

Re: NIC detected, but won't DHCP or configure

2005-03-21 Thread jason henson
Andrew Robinson wrote: Dear FreeBSD hackers, I posted the following question on freebsd-questions. Two kind souls kicked it around for a little and suggested that I pass it on to you. I have a laptop with a netowrk card that seems to be successfully detected under FreeBSD, Knoppix, and WinXP,

Re: NIC detected, but won't DHCP or configure

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Robinson
Hi Jason, thanks for the suggestion! I tried that and it didn't seem to change anything: the relevant output of pciconf -lv is still [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0:class=0x02 card=0x09001558 chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'RTL8169