I know that this is not the place to consult on programming C. But I
am so enthusiastic in FreeBSD that I want to learn more on the
language C and someday coming to be a small part of which you already
are. It wanted that they recommended to me some webpage where to be
able to obtain information
I'm down in the bowels of chasing a weird bug that is being presented
by sendmail when doing TLS. For *some* clients it works, but for the
ones that fail, they fail hard.
There are various weird things in my analyses.
The proximate symptom is that the call to write() to put out the
ServerHello m
On Monday 02 May 2005 13:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >There is a "#ifdef SPARSE_MAPPING" at line 701,and again a "#ifdef
> >SPARSE_MAPPING" at line 713.I just can't understand the second
> >one.Does it have any special mean ?
> >
> >thanks .
>
> It's just conditional compiling construct...howeve
Hello!
The mergemaster with this is test patch (attached)
can auto-update files that was not modified.
It do this by compairing each file with it's CVS
copy. If file was not modified, it can be rewritten.
This dramatically redices amount of files that require
admin's attention.
There is one maj
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:27:09PM +0400, Denis Peplin wrote:
>
> The mergemaster with this is test patch (attached)
> can auto-update files that was not modified.
>
> It do this by compairing each file with it's CVS
> copy. If file was not modified, it can be rewritten.
>
> This dramatically re
John Hay wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:27:09PM +0400, Denis Peplin wrote:
>>There is one major problem here:
>>This can be done in single-user mode only if your
>>have local CVS repository, because if local CVS is
>>not exist, anoncvs is used.
>>
>>Possible solutions:
>
>
> What about mer
Hi,
Pablo Mora wrote:
I know that this is not the place to consult on programming C. But I
am so enthusiastic in FreeBSD that I want to learn more on the
language C and someday coming to be a small part of which you already
To get this a bit in line with FreeBSD:
FreeBSD comes with the GNU compile
> On Mon, 2 May 2005, c0ldbyte wrote:
>
> >> I have a "HDD Post Write Buffer" in the BIOS according to the MB manual
> >> although the disks aren't connected to the MB controllers they are on RAID
> >> 5 set off a PCI-X card. Will give it a go tomorrow ( drag the monitor
> >> back to the rack ).
thanks for all your responses.I know that it is just conditional
compiling construct,but I just can't understand the nested *test* of
SPARSE_MAPPING( the 2nd "#ifdef ..." is nested in the 1st one).
Thanks .I think I get it now.
On Monday 02 May 2005 13:35, gerarra at tin.it wrote:
>> >There is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Denis Peplin wrote:
Hello!
The mergemaster with this is test patch (attached)
can auto-update files that was not modified.
It do this by compairing each file with it's CVS
copy. If file was not modified, it can be rewritten.
This dra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Pablo Mora wrote:
I know that this is not the place to consult on programming C. But I
am so enthusiastic in FreeBSD that I want to learn more on the
language C and someday coming to be a small part of which you already
are. It wan
So sounds like this does need a bit of looking at. The key thing is
both reboot and halt always leave the machine FS in a good state
where as shutdown -p doesnt so is there something that -p skips?
Or is it simply the fact that it powers down?
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Danny Bra
On Mon, 2 May 2005, 13:20+0300, Imri Zvik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was playing around with ipfw, and when I tried something like:
>
> /sbin/ipfw disable firewall
>
> /sbin/ipfw flush && sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets=600
>
>
>
> /sbin/ipfw enable firewall
>
>
>
> The machine paniced:
Mine doesn't:
On Tue, 3 May 2005, 17:49+0300, Imri Zvik wrote:
> I forgot to mention I was using ipfw1.
>
> When I upgraded to ipfw2 it didn't happen again.
[...]
> Mine doesn't:
>
> shy# uname -a
> FreeBSD shy.macomnet.ru 4.11-STABLE FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #0: Thu Apr 21
> 05:48:09 MSD 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello freebsd-hackers
I have a question related to the simple code below:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
struct addrinfo hints, *la, *localaddr;
char buf[31];
int gaierr=0;
Hi,
> On Tue, 3 May 2005 18:39:10 +0300
> Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
fenix>//get local address - local address is 192.168.0.250
fenix>if ((gaierr = getaddrinfo(argv[1], argv[2], &hints, &localaddr))
!= 0)
fenix>errx(1, "%s port %s: %s", argv[1], argv[2],
John Hay wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:27:09PM +0400, Denis Peplin wrote:
The mergemaster with this is test patch (attached)
can auto-update files that was not modified.
It do this by compairing each file with it's CVS
copy. If file was not modified, it can be rewritten.
This dramatically redic
c0ldbyte wrote:
IMHO this isnt something that should be included with mergemaster due
to the following things. 1). It should upgrade a file if the files cvs
id doesnt match and provide you with a merge option, which it allready
does both of those as it is now. 2). Only upgrading files that havent
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:39:23PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> So sounds like this does need a bit of looking at. The key thing is
> both reboot and halt always leave the machine FS in a good state
> where as shutdown -p doesnt so is there something that -p skips?
> Or is it simply the fact tha
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:15:51AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> c0ldbyte wrote:
[...]
> >But with all due respect, This just seems like another case of a
> >"Bike Shed" incident.
> not at all.
> I've wanted this for a long time..
> files that I have not touched are at default state and I wnat th
Hello.
I was surfing the dragonflybsd wiki site the other day and found out
that they are doing a "base-cleanup". That is they are compiling the
tools that come with the base system with WARNS?=6 ...
Humm... This is something that I could do.. Minor cleanup (since I'm no
C expert or a OS develope
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:38:37PM +, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I was surfing the dragonflybsd wiki site the other day and found out
> that they are doing a "base-cleanup". That is they are compiling the
> tools that come with the base system with WARNS?=6 ...
>
> Humm... This
Thanks by responding me. I will revise each direction that have given
me and truly I thank it a lot.
--
Concepción, Chile.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any m
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 04:39 pm, John Giacomoni wrote:
can someone give me an example of a situation where one needs to use
memory barriers to ensure "correctness" when doing writes as above?
One basic example:
struct foo *p = malloc(sizeof(struct foo)); // Step 1
p->bar = 0; // Step 2
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Juergen Unger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:15:51AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
: > c0ldbyte wrote:
: [...]
: > >But with all due respect, This just seems like another case of a
: > >"Bike Shed" incident.
: > not at all.
: > I
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: it. This can be nontrivial. Also, Dragonfly doesn't have to worry
: about any other architectures than i386, so it's possible that they
: haven't "really" fixed many of these warnings (i.e. they might still
:
26 matches
Mail list logo
