If that where the case it would have been it wouldn't have been
46Mb/s it would have been 543Mb/s, just tested it for you :P
Steve / K
- Original Message -
From: Willem Jan Withagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Hartland wrote:
I've just finished putting together a new server box spec:
Steven Hartland wrote:
If that where the case it would have been it wouldn't have been
46Mb/s it would have been 543Mb/s, just tested it for you :P
I've just finished putting together a new server box spec:
Dual AMD 244, 2GB ram, 5 * Seagate SATA 400GB on a
Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 array.
hello, hackers.
I use following line to recive message from message queue:
int ret;
ret = msgrcv(msgid, msg, sizeof(msg), 0, IPC_NOWAIT) if (ret == -1) {
if (errno == EAGAIN){
// no message in queue
}
else{
// here is an error occur
}
}
but it sounds not works as
Steven Hartland wrote:
If that where the case it would have been it wouldn't have been
46Mb/s it would have been 543Mb/s, just tested it for you :P
The RR1280 cards are really just software RAID cards. All of the parity
calculations are done by the CPU. I couldn't find much evidence that
the
Original Message -
From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Hartland wrote:
If that where the case it would have been it wouldn't have been
46Mb/s it would have been 543Mb/s, just tested it for you :P
The RR1280 cards are really just software RAID cards. All of the parity
Steven Hartland wrote:
Original Message - From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Hartland wrote:
If that where the case it would have been it wouldn't have been
46Mb/s it would have been 543Mb/s, just tested it for you :P
The RR1280 cards are really just software RAID cards. All of
- Original Message -
From: willem jan withagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If that where the case it would have been it wouldn't have been
46Mb/s it would have been 543Mb/s, just tested it for you :P
I've just finished putting together a new server box spec:
Dual AMD 244, 2GB ram, 5 * Seagate SATA
- Original Message -
From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the documentation this is not the case and the XOR
calcs are done in hardware on the onboard HPT 601.
Maybe I'm confused and we are talking about different cards.
Quite possibly all other highpoint cards that Im aware of
In the last episode (May 07), ChenMing said:
I use following line to recive message from message queue:
int ret;
ret = msgrcv(msgid, msg, sizeof(msg), 0, IPC_NOWAIT) if (ret == -1) {
if (errno == EAGAIN){
// no message in queue
}
else{
// here is an error
Steven Hartland wrote:
Still I would argue that if you do not use a write size larger than
what you have as real memory, that buffering in real memory is going
to play a role
I think you miss read all the details here Willem.
Sorry about that, if that is the case.
Original values:
Write:
- Original Message -
From: Willem Jan Withagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is well phrased English for what I was trying to say. I'm glad to see
that it worked for you. And I'm certainly impressed by the numbers...
This is on a 4 disk RAID5 with one hot spare???
Unfortunately not, we needed
Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the documentation this is not the case and the XOR
calcs are done in hardware on the onboard HPT 601.
Maybe I'm confused and we are talking about different cards.
Quite possibly all other
At Sun, 08 May 2005 08:35:38 -0600,
Scott Long wrote:
According to the documentation this is not the case and the XOR
calcs are done in hardware on the onboard HPT 601.
Maybe I'm confused and we are talking about different cards.
RocketRAID 1820 is a plain SATA card with software RAID.
1820A
13 matches
Mail list logo
