Hi,
I am working on an OS derived for BSD 4.1 . I am trying to backport a
thread-safe version of popen() from BSD 4.10 .
My plan is to create a file in libc_r/uhtread as uthread_popen.c which
will contain the thread safe version of the code .
The problem I am facing while building the
I pulled all my hair and lost my sanity.
I searched mailing lists ang google, found a lot of people with my
same problem but never a definitive solution.
Problem is when trying to build on fbsd no matter which program out of
CVS (ie: not a release) which uses GNU autotools.
After patching
In the last episode (Jul 05), Dipjyoti Saikia said:
I am working on an OS derived for BSD 4.1 . I am trying to backport
a thread-safe version of popen() from BSD 4.10 .
popen should be threadsafe as of rev 1.17 (2003-01-03) of
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/popen.c . It was merged into the 4.* branch
On 2005-07-05 16:14, Marco Molteni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pulled all my hair and lost my sanity. I searched mailing lists ang
google, found a lot of people with my same problem but never a
definitive solution.
Problem is when trying to build on fbsd no matter which program out of
CVS
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:14:45PM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
I pulled all my hair and lost my sanity.
I searched mailing lists ang google, found a lot of people with my
same problem but never a definitive solution.
Problem is when trying to build on fbsd no matter which program out of
CVS
Hi hackers,
I'm still working on integrating the ProPolice patch in FreeBSD CURRENT.
A small reminder :
The ProPolice patch prevents from stack-based buffer overflows
but setting a canary between character arrays and the return
address stored in the stack. In addition,
I am having problems linking in the Java JVM libraries (libjava.so,
libverify.so, libjvm.so) into my executable.
With these options added to my gcc command:
-L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386 -ljava -lverify
-L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/server -ljvm
It links ok, but when I try to run it
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 07:25, Tom Schutter wrote:
1) Why is the RPATH in the executable being ignored?
I think this is a feature, not a bug.. I forget the exact reason though - I am
pretty sure this has been discussed on the lists when ELF came in though.
2) When I add the -rpath, I get two
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 03:55:26PM -0600, Tom Schutter wrote:
I am having problems linking in the Java JVM libraries (libjava.so,
libverify.so, libjvm.so) into my executable.
With these options added to my gcc command:
-L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386 -ljava -lverify
9 matches
Mail list logo
