Forgive me if this is off-topic.
How could I force a packet to go out through an interface,
despite the default route?
Suppose I have two interfaces connected to the internet:
1) rl0 (real.ip.no.1) ---> ISP x
2) rl1 (real.ip.no.2) ---> ISP y
ISP y is just a backup link. ISP x is the working li
> Suppose 1) is down. I switch to 2). But I have to keep testing 1)
> to see when it comes back up. How could I force a packet (ping maybe?)
> to www.whatever.com through 1), despite the default route being 2) ?
>
> I am aready binding the ping packet to the IP I want but that´s not enough.
>
>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 04:53:25PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> Forgive me if this is off-topic.
> How could I force a packet to go out through an interface,
> despite the default route?
You have a couple of options.
Look at CARP in 5.4, that might do what you want best.
man 4 carp
Also google fo
Hi,
I've to start working on a new server right now that should use ataraid
for RAID mirroring but the customer shipped a box with only one disk and
the second one won't arrive soon for many reasons.
I know ataraid can't build a RAID mirror without two disks and I've
already checked both atacon
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 11:38, Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote:
> But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the RAID1
> array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work
> like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :)
I haven't been able to do this :
On 7/11/05, Giovanni P. Tirloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the RAID1
> array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work
> like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :)
What is the advantage of buildi
Aaron Glenn disse:
> On 7/11/05, Giovanni P. Tirloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the
>> RAID1
>> array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work
>> like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :)
>
>
> Hello Maslan,
>
> > hi guys
> > what about cross-compiling freebsd-5.4 from a different BSD as openbsd
> > or even linux.
> > how can i accomplish this ???
>
> AFAIK, only NetBSD allows to do this with their source. I've never
> heard of such a thing with FreeBSD sources.
>
> Regards,
> --
>
On 7/11/05, Giovanni P. Tirloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be able to work on this server right now and add the second disk when
> it arrives without reinstalling everything.
Mirroring via software (gmirror) is not an option?
aaron.glenn
___
free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the RAID1
> array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work
> like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :)
>
Find some unused disk, plug it into t
Hi All
When I try to catch SIGTERM and generate a core file the call stack is
corrupted on FreeBSD.
Yes I know that I do not have to catch the signal, a core is generated by
default. But the reason is that I need to do more at SIGTERM.
Example 1
In gdb backtrace, why is monitorSignalHandl
11 matches
Mail list logo
