Florent Thoumie wrote:
> I'm currently working on OpenBGPd port update and I'm facing a
> little problem that is actually quite painful to deal with.
>
> I need some macros from OpenBSD sys/queue.h which aren't present
> in FreeBSD. I can replace #include with #include
>
Le Mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 01:14 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas a écrit :
> On 2005-07-12 17:59, Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm currently working on OpenBGPd port update and I'm facing a little
> > problem that is actually quite painful to deal with.
> >
> > I need some macros from
On 2005-07-12 17:59, Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently working on OpenBGPd port update and I'm facing a little
> problem that is actually quite painful to deal with.
>
> I need some macros from OpenBSD sys/queue.h which aren't present in
> FreeBSD. I can replace #include w
Le Mardi 12 Juillet 2005 19:39, Florent Thoumie a écrit :
> Le Mardi 12 juillet 2005 à 12:55 -0400, Kris Kennaway a écrit :
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Olivier Certner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There is a bug with portupgrade when it is used to upgrade already
> > > compile
Thanks to all that helped !!
--
//| //||
// | // ||
-//--//--|| ARIO LOBO
// //||
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mariolobo.70d.com
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
Yep, that'll do it. Just choose two time servers that you would never need
to use in real life. From google, you should be able to find a list of
nearby public time servers.
-john
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Mario Lobo wrote:
> That sounds close to what I need !!
>
> > > 1) rl0 ---> router
That sounds close to what I need !!
> > 1) rl0 ---> router --> antenna --> ISPx -->
> > internet
So would it be something like:
route add -host ${ip.of.public.host} netmask 255.255.255.255 gateway
${ip.of.rl0}
is that correct?
In this case that host will be "sacrifice
Hi all,
i know that we add already discuss about this problem, but is there any
solution for this problem ?
---
What's section on nagios website
"FreeBSD and threads. On FreeBSD there's a native user-level
implementation of threads called 'pthread' and there's also an optional
ports collection '
Le Mardi 12 juillet 2005 à 12:55 -0400, Kris Kennaway a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Olivier Certner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a bug with portupgrade when it is used to upgrade already
> > compiled
> > and installed ports for which some dependencies have been
Gayn Winters disse:
> Gmirror (geom) will do it in anticipation of the second disk. In fact,
> it is the recommended way to bootstrap a software mirror. Just do the
> first couple steps of:
> http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/24/freebsd-howto-gmirror-system/
>
> Alternatively, do the first few
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Olivier Certner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a bug with portupgrade when it is used to upgrade already
> compiled
> and installed ports for which some dependencies have been deleted in the
> package database. This causes a crash in the function
I'm currently working on OpenBGPd port update and I'm facing a
little problem that is actually quite painful to deal with.
I need some macros from OpenBSD sys/queue.h which aren't present
in FreeBSD. I can replace #include with #include
"queue.h" and copy t
Lately "Mario Lobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The problem lies with the fact that, there is a router between my rl0 and the
> internet.
>
> 1) rl0 ---> router --> antenna --> ISPx --> internet
>
> So the fact that i can ping the hop next to rl0 doesn´t mean the link is
Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道：
On 7/12/05, Jone Jas wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I googled and found this method but I just
> did not have a try.
> As for the code-hacking method I mentioned, anyone with any idea
> is appreciated!
See ufs_quota.c, especially chkdqchg(). It is passed a str
Mario,
I think the only way to do what you want is to find two hosts on the
internet that don't conflict with what you do on a day to day basis. Then
add custom routes for those two specific hosts, and with those routes, you
force traffic through each NIC.
A perfect example of two public servers
Yeah Stefan. They do take the default route. That is what I am already doing.
I even wrote a little prog using a variation of ping to do just that.
The problem lies with the fact that, there is a router between my rl0 and the
internet.
1) rl0 ---> router --> antenna --> ISP
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:38:16AM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> First, thanks to all for the suggestions.
>
> Now, using the same scenario,
>
> > > 1) rl0 (real.ip.no.1) ---> ISP x
> > >
> > > 2) rl1 (real.ip.no.2) ---> ISP y
>
> Suppose 1) is down and I´m using 2). If I "ping www.google.com",
> i
On 7/12/05, Jone Jas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I googled and found this method but I just
> did not have a try.
> As for the code-hacking method I mentioned, anyone with any idea
> is appreciated!
See ufs_quota.c, especially chkdqchg(). It is passed a struct
ucred
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 10:50, Jone Jas wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>As far as I know, there is no limit of the disk space that a jail
> can use. As for the Linux VServer(similar to jail), its dlimit does
> such thing for the "security context". I read the dlimit code and
> find that it achieves that
add a static route
ping the other side of the directly connect interface
..etc..
fr
On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:26 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
Forgive me if this is off-topic.
How could I force a packet to go out through an interface,
despite the default route?
Suppose I have two interfaces connected to
Hello Hackers ,
I am doing a project where i am supposed to backport some hyperthreading code
from FreeBSD 5.x to 4.1 . I found the scheduler code in version 5.x in the file
sched_4bsd.c / sched_ule.c ( for the ULE scheduler ) where as in FreeBSD
version 4.1 I was unable to find the scheduler
Thanks for your reply. I googled and found this method but I just
did not have a try.
As for the code-hacking method I mentioned, anyone with any idea
is appreciated!
Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道：
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 10:50, Jone Jas wrote:
> Hi hackers,
> As far as I know, there is no
Vasil Dimov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the RAID1
array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work
like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :)
Find some unused disk, p
First, thanks to all for the suggestions.
Now, using the same scenario,
> > 1) rl0 (real.ip.no.1) ---> ISP x
> >
> > 2) rl1 (real.ip.no.2) ---> ISP y
Suppose 1) is down and I´m using 2). If I "ping www.google.com",
it will go out through 2). What I really need to do is to issue
the same "ping ww
Hi hackers,
As far as I know, there is no limit of the disk space that a jail can use.
As for the Linux VServer(similar to jail), its dlimit does such thing for the
"security context". I read the dlimit code and find that it achieves that by
limiting the number of inodes and data blocks the
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:07:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> When I try to catch SIGTERM and generate a core file the call
> stack is corrupted on FreeBSD.
A process stack is not corrupted. Since a process was terminated
while it was is a signal handler, it is wrong to interpreter the
26 matches
Mail list logo
