Re: Atheros, hardware access layer, collisions

On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:03:49PM -0500, Sam Pierson wrote: I think there is still collision detection happening on the hardware level. I think I have to disable the retransmission of frames which are lost due to collisions. Here's my reasoning: In the lab, two hosts are sending packets

Re: Ancient FreeBSD releases online

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: ftp://phk.freebsd.dk ./386BSD/cd1.iso Can you upload MD5 checksums too? -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To

Re: /etc/opiekeys permissions?

On Thu, 2005-Jul-14 14:14:42 +0400, Eygene A. Ryabinkin wrote: Playing with OPIE I've noticed that the /etc/opiekeys have mode 644. ... But now it seems to be vulnurable again. Are there any programs that are run in non-root mode and they do want to use OPIE? If there is no such programs, why

Re: /etc/opiekeys permissions?

Since an OPIE password can only be used once, any program that uses OPIE needs to be able to read and write /etc/opiekeys. There is no valid reason for a program to just want to read the file. Good point. I've missed it. Thanks. So, the arguments for permissions 0600 instead of 0644 are

Re: help w/panic under heavy load - 5.4

On 2005-07-20 11:41, Edwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to understand the particulars about this - I get the null pointer part, but as to ip_fragment - it's fragmenting mbufs to handle ip packets during switching? and its failing trying to copy data past the end of the chain?

Re: Atheros, hardware access layer, collisions

On 7/21/05, David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:03:49PM -0500, Sam Pierson wrote: I think there is still collision detection happening on the hardware level. I think I have to disable the retransmission of frames which are lost due to collisions. Here's my

IPv4 Link Local support in FreeBSD

Hi All, Does FreeBSD support IPv4 Link Local addresses as per RFC 3927 ? -Arul Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ___

Re: help w/panic under heavy load - 5.4

On 2005-07-21 14:57, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2005-07-20 11:41, Edwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to understand the particulars about this - I get the null pointer part, but as to ip_fragment - it's fragmenting mbufs to handle ip packets during switching? and

Re: Atheros, hardware access layer, collisions

I've got two computers synchronized to send one packet each to this machine sitting between them. This machine responds with a packet to each that it receives (on the application level, not in the control frame space), so if there is a collision, I don't want the middle machine to respond

Re: Atheros, hardware access layer, collisions

OK - you can probably achieve that by setting the retry limit to be 1, setting CWmin to be very small. I was looking for this in the ah.h and the ah_desc.h files. Are they someplace else, or maybe this is a system call? I can't find anything about the retry limit (-- CWmin = retry?) Thanks,

sendmail and clamav milter setting

Hi I have a clamd server(antivirus server), opening TCP connection instead of the unix domain socket. Next, I have another separate sendmail server. Now I want to do virus scanning. So, should the clamav-milter daemon be on the sendmail server or the antivirus server? I have this configuration

Re: sendmail and clamav milter setting

In the last episode (Jul 21), Patrick Dung said: I have a clamd server(antivirus server), opening TCP connection instead of the unix domain socket. Next, I have another separate sendmail server. Now I want to do virus scanning. So, should the clamav-milter daemon be on the sendmail server

RE: sendmail and clamav milter setting

On Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:19 PM, Patrick Dung unleashed the infinite monkeys and produced: So, should the clamav-milter daemon be on the sendmail server or the antivirus server? You may get more relevant information on the clamav list, or even comp.mail.sendmail (since the question isn't

Re: Atheros, hardware access layer, collisions

I was looking for this in the ah.h and the ah_desc.h files. Are they someplace else, or maybe this is a system call? I can't find anything about the retry limit (-- CWmin = retry?) Thanks, CWmin is a setting that controls the random delay before packets are transmitted. Search for tqi_cwmin

Re: per file lock list

:Hi, : :We have a question: how to get all POSIX locks for a given file? :.. : :As far as I know, existing API does not allow to retrieve all file :locks. Therefore, we need to use kernel internal structures to get all :... :So the question: is there an elegant way to get the lock list for a given

Re: Atheros, hardware access layer, collisions

David Malone wrote: I was looking for this in the ah.h and the ah_desc.h files. Are they someplace else, or maybe this is a system call? I can't find anything about the retry limit (-- CWmin = retry?) Thanks, CWmin is a setting that controls the random delay before packets are transmitted.